19/07/2016 Victoria Derbyshire

This morning, an exclusive report on the Isle of Wight Five.

A group of men convicted of smuggling ?53 million

But could new evidence suggest they're innocent?

This chart would have been really important to the jury in reaching a

conviction because what it purports to show is the fishing vessel coming

across the track of the container vessel as it moved up the English

Channel, and that, the police insisted, showed that it was

possible for drugs to have been transferred from the container

vessel onto the fishing vessel. We'll bring you that full report

in the next few minutes. Plus, an exclusive interview

with a 45-year-old father of two from Yorkshire who's banned

from having sex unless he gives This has been devastating for people

around me. The first thing that happened was my children won't speak

to me now. They've deleted me from Facebook, they don't live in the UK.

John O'Neill has had a sexual risk order imposed on him.

He tells us he's not a dangerous man.

We'll bring you that first and in-depth interview just

And state-sponsored doping on an unprecedented scale.

The Moscow laboratory operated for the protection of doped Russian

athletes within a state directed system.

The International Olympic Committee is meeting today to decide

whether the entire Russian team should be banned from

We'll talk to athletes who say they absolutely should be banned.

Throughout the programme we'll bring you the latest breaking news

and developing stories and, as always, really keen to hear

from you on all the stories we're talking about.

Do get in touch in the usual ways -

If you text, you will be charged at the standard network rate.

MPs have overwhelmingly approved the renewal of the Trident

in favour - due in no small part to the fact that more

than half of Labour MPs voted for the deterrent, and

From Westminster, our political correspondent Tom Bateman

A vote on the future of Britain's nuclear fleet.

The result was never really in question.

A decisive win for the government, backing a new generation of nuclear

People put politics aside and marched to the lobbies in

Defence is the first job of government.

But the vote exposed deep divisions within the Labour Party.

140 of its MPs voted with the government.

Their leader Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong campaigner for

nuclear disarmament, opposed the motion.

The plan to replace this ageing nuclear

fleet was also opposed by the

Scottish National Party, who say its continuing stationing

on the River Clyde could speed moves towards

MPs have been filing out of here after a decisive vote

What it has also done is expose the deep divisions currently

That is convenient for a brand-new Prime Minister trying to

demonstrate unity in her party after the turmoil

The Prime Minister will hold her first cabinet meeting this morning.

Last night's Commons win is likely to give her a boost, but many

Our political guru Norman Smith is in Westminster.

Another illustration of the deep divisions within Labour. How

damaging is this one? Extraordinary because in normal times you would

think if you are a labour leader and more than half of your MPs vote

against you, this morning you will be scrabbling around picking up the

pieces, calling emergency meetings, getting on the blower to Rebels,

desperately trying to shore up your position. That is not what is

happening. Anything, Mr Corbyn's team seem pretty relaxed. You

scratch your head and think, why is this? The answer is that they take

the view that Mr Corbyn's opposition to nuclear weapons is actually

hugely popular amongst many ordinary Labour Party members. They say

that's why you got his huge mandate in the first place to become Labour

leader but they also calculate that in the looming contest to choose a

new Labour leader, not only does it differentiate himself from his

potential challengers, Owen Smith and Angela Eagle, who backed

Trident, but more than that it plays to his narrative as being the dye

who is going to stand up to the old fusty establishment Parliamentary

party, the true radical, the grassroots favourite. In other

words, the vote last night, although it was a huge setback, you would

think, on the face of it, actually Mr Corbyn's people think it will

play extraordinarily well for him in the forthcoming leadership contest.

Thank you, Norman, for the moment. Now over to the BBC

Newsroom for a summary Thank you and good morning.

A hand-painted flag of so-called Islamic State has been found at the

home of the 17-year-old Afghan refugee who attacked several people

with an axe and a knife on a train in Germany. The teenager was shot

dead by police in the attack near the southern city of word spoke. Two

those injured are in a critical condition. The teenager who claimed

asylum after travelling to Germany as an unaccompanied Minor had been

living with a foster family. The Russian Olympic committee has

issued a statement in the last hour saying it stands against doping -

and the fate of honest athletes shouldn't depend

on unproven accusations. It comes as the International

Olympic Committee prepares to decide whether or not to ban all Russian

athletes from the Games in Rio. Russia is accused of operating

a state-sponsored doping programme for four years across the "vast

majority" of summer The country's track-and-field

team is already banned It's been a raucous start

to the Republican convention that will confirm Donald Trump

as the party's There were rowdy scenes when a group

of delegates were refused permission to register their

opposition to Mr Trump. Later a series of his supporters,

including former Mayor of New York Rudy Guiliani,

made speeches on the theme of the convention,

Make America Safe Again. Mr Trump introduced a speech

by his wife, Melania. If you want someone to fight for you

and your country, I can assure you, he's at the guy. He will never ever

give up and, most importantly, he will never ever let you down.

A legal charity says there's evidence of a miscarriage of justice

in the drug-smuggling convictions of a group of fishermen

In an exclusive report, our programme investigates

who were sentenced to up to 24 years in jail for a plot involving nearly

We've found changed stories and damaged evidence.

A man who has to give police 24 hours' notice before having sex

with a woman for the first time has told this programme

45-year-old John O'Neill has been placed on a sexual risk order

after being found not guilty of rape.

But North Yorkshire Police applied for the order after the court

was told he had a fascination with rape fantasies and was

You can hear that exclusive interview with us later in the show.

Los Angeles police are investigating after a Playboy model publicly

shared a photograph of another woman naked in a gym changing room.

Captioned "if I can't unsee this then you can't either", Dani Mathers

posted the image beside one of herself covering her

She later apologised, saying she thought the Snapchat post

It's illegal in California to share a person's naked image

She's also come in for a major social media backlash.

Later in the programme we'll bring you that exclusive interview

with a man who has been ordered to give police 24 hour

notice before any sexual activity with a new partner.

He says that includes even kissing. That is just after 9:30am.

We will start with an update on the vacant England manager post it up in

the last few minutes, the BBC can confirm that the Hull manager Steve

Bruce had an interview for the position with the FA panel

yesterday. Sunderland manager Sam Allardyce also held talks last week.

More on that throughout the day as we get it.

Chris Froome can enjoy today's rest day at the Tour de France,

with his lead of nearly two minutes still intact.

Peter Sagan won yesterday's stage in the Swiss capital Berne,

but two-time winner Froome crossed the line in 13th to maintain his

There are now four days of racing before the final stage

Froome is the race favourite, but isn't taking

Other teams have said they're going to attack next week in the Alps, at

this week in the Alps, sorry. And I expect they will do. So to say that

the two's won, and I don't have any rivals, that's rubbish.

James Anderson, Ben Stokes and Adil Rashid have all been added

to the England squad for the second test against Pakistan,

Anderson missed the opening test defeat at Lord's

because he was injured, but is expected to return at Old Trafford -

The Lancashire bowler's recall comes after he was knocked off the top

of the test bowling rankings by Yasir Shah - what a game

he had in the first match, taking ten wickets.

Fresh from his Wimbledon heroics just nine days ago,

Andy Murray has decided not to defend his Rogers Cup title

Murray has not played since beating Milos Raonic to clinch the title

for the second time, and watched as Great Britain

won their Davis Cup tie against Serbia in

Murray will train in Majorca before defending his Olympic

Now, despite failing to make a single appearance at Euro 2016,

Northern Ireland striker Will Grigg has earned his place among the best

He's even received as many votes as France midfielder

Not taking anything away from his footballing ability but it may have

had more to do with a song sung by fans throughout the tournament.

The Will Grigg's On Fire song was sung by all fans,

Will Greg Others on fire. Sonny your defence is terrified Sonny will

Greg's on fire. No thank you. I've heard enough of

it. It was one of the most

audacious drugs smuggling ?53 million worth of cocaine

was dropped off the side of a giant container ship

in the English Channel and apparently picked up on a stormy

night by a group of fishermen They were convicted and given stiff

sentences, up to 24 years Now a new legal charity that

specialises in miscarriage of justice cases thinks it's

uncovered new evidence that proves the men could not have

committed the crime. Our reporter Jim Reed has been

following their story. Now here's the shipping forecast

issued by the Met Office at 0015 today, Saturday, the 29th of May. 24

years in prison? What? ! What do we do now? The area forecasts for the

next 24 hours... Humber, Thames, Dover... 24 years as a lifetime. How

do you expect Jamie's children to get their head around a centre

fightback? The sentence their father was given was longer than the lives

that they'd lived. A group of fishermen from the Isle of Wight,

all now serving long sentences for one of the largest, most audacious

drug plots in British history. The case against them, a quarter of a

tonne of cocaine was hit in an acute container ship once way to Holland.

The drugs were dumped in the English Channel for the men to pick up in

their fishing boats in the middle of the night. They sailed back to these

cliffs and tied the sacks to a boy to collect later or for someone else

to pick up. Hello. Hello, darling. You all right? Yes, good, good,

good, we're OK. The men involved have left behind wives and

girlfriends, sons and daughters. Speak to you in a bit. Love you.

Hello. Jonathan, convicted of organising the plot, is serving 24

years in a high security prison. They literally came to the door in

the morning, asked me and the children to stay here said, "We need

to speak to your husband," took him into the front room and asked a

range of questions and they said we needed my husband to answer

questions in connection with a serious crime. "Yeah, OK, whatever,

this is mad. Are we awake? " When you found out what he was being

accused of an charged with, what was your reaction? Oh, it's ridiculous.

What? ! It's just a stupid mistake and he'll be home, which they told

Flynn. "Don't cry, be brave, that will be home tonight". They even

told John went he emptied his pockets to keep ?40 in its pocket so

he could get home that might. But he didn't come home? Didn't come home,

hasn't been home since January 2011. The facts of this case are murky to

say the least. Stories have changed, evidence has been damaged. The five

men have always said they were innocent. That new defence team is

now planning a fresh appeal. We've spent six months looking in detail

at the evidence, obtaining exclusive footage, never shown in public

before. A Bank Holiday weekend six years

ago, in mid-afternoon a fishing boat, the Galwad, left on what the

crew claim was a routine trip. When he went out on the 29th, it was

rough weather. Jamie always fished mid-channel. A lot of the smaller in

shore boats couldn't get out that deep so obviously it was a good area

because it wasn't over fished. Nikki Green is the sister of Jamie Green.

45 years old with three children and no serious criminal record, he was

the man in charge, the skipper of the boat. Why would he go out in

conditions like that? Jamie, the weather was forecast to blow until

about midnight, midnight 1am in the morning and then it would have

dropped off. That time would have been his travelling time to where he

would work. So the fact that it was particularly bad weather at that

point wouldn't have bothered him too much because he would have been out

on-the-spot when the weather improved and been able to get

straight to work. So it wasn't unusual then for him to go out in

those conditions? No. No. No. Not at all. That night, a major drug search

was taking place in the channel. The full details of Operation Disorient

have never been made public, but it involves surveillance planes, a

patrol ship and police look-outs along the coast. Intelligence came

in that cocaine was being smuggled on huge container ships from South

America. It appears this vessel, was one of a number being watched that

night. At some point, both cargo ship and fishing boats came close

together. The Galwad continued, sailing past fresh water bay. The

next day, a member of the public spotted 11 water proof sacks tangled

around a buoy in the same bay. Each packed with a pure form of cocaine.

Today, the Galwad is rusting away in a boat yard in Cowes, the police

said the drugs were picked up by this fishing boat and dropped off in

the bay to be collected later. What we're looking for on board today is

just anything that might have been missed when the police searched the

vessel... For years the lawyer Emily Bolton had been living in the US

working with inmates on Death Row. I'm looking at documents and I'm

taking photographs of what remains of the electrical equipment on

board. Now she set up the first charity of its kind in Britain

specialising in miscarriage of justice investigations. I think the

police really thought the drugs were down that hole there. What is what?

That's the tank. If you would like to peer over the edge, you will see

that that is full of water. It is used to keep lobsters alive before

they make their way to your plate of the Fire Brigade came into Yarmouth

Harbour and stuck pumps down there and someone was brave enough to

climb down the ladder and start looking for signs of drugs being

stored down there and they found absolutely nothing. Presumably if

the drugs were stored in watertight bags, which in this case they were,

it is not surprising they found no trace of the actual cocaine itself?

You say that the drugs were packed in watertight bags. Actually they

weren't because several of the bags when they opened them, they then

ripped open the plastic containers and got into the cocaine, the

cocaine was damp. You could expect on any vessel that this had carried

the bags some leakage, some weak cocaine soup and that's why they

went over the boat with a fine tooth comb, in this case an itemiser, a

device that detects traces of drugs. It is not that they were just

looking for a big pile of cocaine, they were looking for a trace and so

they used the itemiser to see if they could find that cocaine soup

and they didn't find any. At the time the Galwad was in the channel a

series of calls were made to the satellite phone on the boat. The

prosecution said these were evidence that someone on shore was

co-ordinating the drugs drop. The defence said the timing was a

coincidence and someone was checking on the health of one of the

fishermen, a migrant from Eastern Europe. 38-year-old Daniel Payne was

one of the men on board the fishing boat that night. Is serving 18 years

in Surrey. It is not in his nature to do that sort of thing. He has no

need to do that sort of thing. He was happy with his partner. He was

happy doing his fishing. He had a job. In the building industry and so

on. And when that sort of tailed off a bit, he went on odd jobs with the

skipper of the boat and that's what it was. It was just a one off

fishing trip. Just to get some money. And when you think the last

time his position coming back through there would have been that

night, I guess? Yeah. The last time he came in, yeah. Daniel's family

say he was visited by officers from the Serious Organised Crime Agency,

and offered a deal to stay out of prison. Two officers came into the

remand prison where he was and basically offered him immunity if he

implicated the skipper of the boat in this case if you like. Of course,

Daniel couldn't do that because there was nothing to implicate him

with. He couldn't take up the offer. No, he couldn't take up the offer

because there was nothing to give. Emily Bolton meanwhile has been

trying to unpick the case against the men. At her charity's office in

London, she has new evidence which, she says, is their best hope of

getting an appeal. Well, this chart would have been really important to

the jury in reaching a conviction because what it purports to show

here is the fishing vessel coming across the track of the container

vessel as it moved up the English Channel and that, the police

insisted, showed that it was possible for drugs to have been

transferred from the container vessel on to the fishing vessel.

The case against the fishing boat was based in large part on this

navigational data. The container ship, was travelling from Brazil to

the Netherlands and she arrived in the English Channel, the fishing

boat was just setting off from its home Port of Yarmouth. It made its

way around the Needles heading south. We've plotted the exact

course of both ships using navigational data from their on

board computers. By midnight, the fishing boat was in deep water in

the middle of the channel. At the same time, the container ship, was

moving at 19 knots towards the European mainland. Then the key

moment in the prosecution's case, the container ships moves east and

the Galwad across her wake. They took photographs of the...

Emily has commissioned an expert review. She says it shows the

prosecution got it wrong, leaving out key plot points and using

damaged data. The prosecution just drew a line between two points and

asserted that's where the container ship was, what we've got now is the

GPS digital data from the fishing vessel and the underlying digital

data for the container ship and we've had an expert look at those

and draw a far more precise map of what actually happened that night.

If true, it would mean the paths of the boats were never closer than 100

meters from each other. The container ship was actually heading

further south than was presented to the jury at trial. That blows the

prosecution case right out of the water. 100 meters isn't that far.

Would it not have been possible for the drugs to be thrown off the side

and then float towards, float 100 meters towards the fishing boat?

That's the question we had and we took that question to Plymouth

Marine Lab and they worked out any objects jet zaned into the sea. As

for the cargo boat, it sailed on to the Netherlands, a few days later,

it did dock in the UK and was searched. No trace of drugs was

found as no one on the Orian was ever arrested. The fishing boat

meanwhile took 18 hours to sail back to the Isle of Wight, it was never

stopped or boarded. It scired around the south of the island fishing near

fresh water bay. The area along the coast where it came back into would

have been off his normal route. Not unusual. As I understand it, I think

they decided to do some mackerel fishing on the way in. By the time

the Galwad returned to its home port, it was being watched. This

surveillance footage shows it sailing into the harbour and this,

taken by officers on the ground, shows the men coming ashore. The

skipper, Jamie Green drives off in the white van. The men went their

separate ways, but returned to Yarmouth that evening. It was at

this point, three were arrested, all for conspiracy to import cocaine. I

was working in the restaurant here where we are now. Somebody told me

there was a kerfuffle on the quay involving Jamie and then somebody

came in and told me that he been arrested and taken to the mainland

later that evening. What was your reaction? A mistake. You know, the

police would realise they made a mistake and everything would be OK.

The next morning a member of the public spotted 11 sports bags

tangled round a buoy in fresh water bay. He called the police. This is

number two. Written on the bottom on the bag is Montana Wind. Each sack

was packed with high purity cocaine. It is here we get to a key piece of

evidence against the five men. Crucial to the convictions. It is

the only piece of direct evidence against the men, but the problem

with it is it keeps changing. As the fishing boat, the Galwad, was

sailing back along the bay, two Hampshire Police officers were

stationed on the cliffs keeping look-out as part of Operation

Disorient. In the original police log, they recorded someone through

six or seven items over board at intervals from the boat. The

fishermen say they may have chucked away bags full of old bait around

this time. The next day after the drugs were found, those look-outs

changed the official log as they are allowed to do. In the new version,

there were ten to 12 items, the size of a hold-all tied together in a

leub followed by a red floating buoy. But isn't it the case that if

you're witnessing something like this, people might not get the

details right every single time? Well, these are officers who are

trained goat the details right every single time and we are not talking

about small details, we are talking about big changes, about the

descriptions of what they saw and also where they saw it from. If you

look at the surveillance footage, the aerial surveillance where they

had a plane up here looking down on the drugs, the first thing you will

see is there a long, windy, white rope floating on the surface of the

sea here and the sea is a dark grey colour and that rope really stands

out. If these two Hampshire officers were up here on the cliff looking

out, the first thing they would have described was the rope and they

don't mention it. So what possible reason, if any, could the look-outs

have to change what they saw? The new defence team can only speculate.

One claim, the men were in custody at that point and more time was

needed to question them. They needed something to hold them while they

continued their investigation because up until that point they

found no evidence. They continued to find no evidence and that left them

in a pickle, but I think that the reason they embellished that

evidence was to extend the custody time limits and continue their

investigation. The two police look-outs later gave different

details of what happened that day. But both were adamant they had seen

ten to 12 sax thrown off the fishing boat along with a buoy. They said

after they called in the first log entry they had seen extra bags

thrown off the boat so the second version was the full picture. The

independent Police Watchdog looked into the case and though it found

inconsistencies in their evidence, there was not enough to show they

fabricated the account. Hampshire Police say they have no on going

complaints related to this investigation. At trial, the five

men were convicted by majority verdict and sentenced to a total of

104 years in prison. The Serious Organised Crime Agency said the

operation had stopped a huge amount of cocaine from reaching the streets

of the UK. For some people, are just going to think it is too much of a

coinsquence that this fishing boat was in the wrong place at the wrong

time, twice over. Your question assumes two things, one of which is

there were drugs on the Orian, that's never been proven. It appears

to us that Operation Disorient really needed to get a result and

they started focussing on the fishing boat and from then on

interpreted all the evidence that came before them as pointing to

guilt. And meanwhile they ignored or didn't even seek other evidence that

points in the opposite direction. The new evidence shown in the film

has been passed to the Criminal Cases Review Commission who will now

decide if the five men can launch a fresh appeal. The National Crime

Agency says it can not comment while that investigation is ongoing.

And if you want to share that film you can find it on our programme

After 10.30am, we'll speak to the daughter of one

of the men convicted in that drug smuggling plot.

Still to come... This man has to give police 24 hours' notice before

having sex with a new partner because he is subject to a sexual

risk order. We'll bring you an exclusive interview with John

O'Neill in the next few minutes. And should this woman have

co-presented Channel 4 News during coverage of the niece Laurie attack?

-- the niece Laurie attack. Son columnist Kelvin MacKenzie says she

shouldn't have. Here is Annita McVeigh in the BBC

newsroom with a summary of today's news.

MPs voted overwhelmingly overnight to approve a renewal of the nuclear

weapons system. More than half of Labour MPs voted for the deterrent

and against their leader, Jeremy Corbyn.

A hand-painted flag of the terror group so-called

at the home of a 17-year-old Afghan refugee who attacked several

people with an axe and a knife on a train in Germany.

The teenager was shot dead by police during the attack near the southern

Two of those injured are in a critical condition.

The teenager, who had claimed asylum after travelling to Germany

as an unaccompanied minor, had been living with a foster family.

Theresa May is holding her first cabinet meeting as Prime Minister

this morning. The members of her new team began arriving at ten Downing

St about half an hour ago. Misses me is expected to set out her

priorities, including leaving the EU, during the meeting, head of

visits to Germany and France later in the week. -- Mrs May.

It's been a raucous start to the Republican convention that

will confirm Donald Trump as the party's

There were rowdy scenes when a group of delegates were refused permission

to register their opposition to Mr Trump.

Later Mr Trump introduced his wife, Melania, and through the night

a series of his supporters, including former Mayor

of New York Rudy Guiliani, who made tub-thumping speeches

The Russian Olympic committee has declared this morning that

it stands against doping - but that the fate of honest

athletes shouldn't depend on unproven accusations.

It comes as the International Olympic Committee prepares to decide

whether or not to ban all Russian athletes from the Games in Rio.

Russia is accused of operating a state-sponsored doping programme

for four years across the "vast majority" of summer

The country's track-and-field team is already banned

Los Angeles police are investigating after a Playboy model publicly

shared a photograph of another woman naked in a gym changing room.

Captioned "if I can't unsee this then you can't either", Dani Mathers

posted the image beside one of herself covering her

She later apologised, saying she thought the Snapchat post

It's illegal in California to share a person's naked image

She's also come in for a major social media backlash.

That's a summary of the latest BBC News - more at ten.

Jessica has the sport headlines now.

The BBC's had it confirmed in the last half an hour that Hull

boss Steve Bruce had an interview for the vacant England

Sunderland boss Sam Allardyce also held talks last week.

Peter Sadam won yesterday's Tour de France stage in the Swiss capital,

but Chris Froome crossed the line in 13th to minting his grip on the

yellow jersey. He has a lead of nearly two minutes.

James Anderson, Ben Stokes and Adil Rashid have all been added

to the England squad for the second test against Pakistan,

Anderson missed the opening test defeat at Lord's

because he was injured, but is expected to return at Old Trafford -

Andy Murray has decided not to defend his Rogers Cup title

The world number two has not played since beating Milos Raonic

for the second time, and watched as Great Britain

won their Davis Cup tie against Serbia in

Murray will train in Majorca before defending his Olympic

More sport at ten o'clock. Thank you very much. Norman is in

Downing Street, where Theresa May is holding her first Cabinet meeting of

senior government ministers. They have all be on their best

behaviour this morning. They all arrived well ahead of 9:30am, they

all trooped in, didn't really say anything. Even Boris Johnson didn't

pose too much on the doorstep, so they all piled on and I guess they

now have to scramble to see where they are around that big table,

because that will tell them what the pecking order is, where they are in

the new May government, how close they are to Mrs Mayall whether

they've been booted down to the end of the table. As for business, we

are told Mrs May wants to say to her ministers, we can't allow this

government to be totally defined by the issue of Brexit. She wants

social justice, she says, to be a part of the government agenda.

Remember when she was on the steps of Downing Street after becoming

Prime Minister, she talked a lot about how it was going to be a

government for working people, not the privileged few, so that will be

her message this morning. But there's no getting away from it,

Brexit is the big deal. I don't know if you can cast your eyes down

towards the end of Downing Street. There is a big building, which is

number nine Downing St. That is going to be the new Brexit

department, so that is where David Davis, the new Brexit minister is

going to be based and that's where civil servants are going to be and

that's where all the hard graft is going to have to be done about

getting us out of the EU. There had been a view that he would be bobbed

off to the old department for energy and climate change down the road

along Whitehall. The fact that he's in Downing Street suggests to me

that Brexit is absolutely going to be at the heart of this government

but is it also an indication that Mrs May wants to keep tabs on what

is going on, so the David Davis is within easy hailing distance? One

other thing to support that theory, she's appointed one of her key

allies, Alan Duncan, a experienced Conservative MP, as Boris Johnson's

number two in the Foreign Office, basically as the minister for Boris,

to keep an eye on him, to make sure he behaves. So you get the sense

that Mrs May is just trying to make sure she's got an absolute grip on

everything and in particular on Brexit. And I wonder, Norman, how

seriously you think Theresa May as Prime Minister is going to take the

input of the Cabinet. Tony Blair became famous for his discussions

with his closest aides on the sofa, David Cameron had his trusted former

school pals and Notting Hill colleagues, didn't he? I think it is

going to be read different because as we know, she's pretty much

disbanded the old Cameroon Notting Hill set. They've been cast to the

winds. Oliver Letwin, one of those key figures, today announced he

wouldn't be standing at the next election. You think they've gone

back to their cafes and Notting Hill and think it is game over because

Theresa May seems to be planning a very different style of government.

In terms of listening and involving other departments, I suspect the

concern of other departments might be not so much whether she is in

listening mode but that she might be fingers in Piedt mode because she's

one of those politicians who likes to get involved in the nitty-gritty,

to have a complete grasp of what's going on, so I suspect there may be

some nervousness that Mrs May as Prime Minister might be quite

interventionist in what other departments are doing and, above

all, what is going on in those Brexit departments. Thank you very

much, Norman. This morning, an exclusive interview

with a man who has to give police 24 hours' notice before

having sex with a woman 45-year-old John O'Neill has been

placed on a sexual risk order after being found

not guilty of rape. After being cleared,

the judge took the unusual step of describing him

as "a very dangerous individual". During his trial a fascination

with sado-masochism was raised, It prompted North Yorkshire Police

to apply for the order, which means he has to tell police the name,

address and date of birth of any woman he wants to have any form

of sexual activity with - including kissing -

24 hours in advance. Mr O'Neill, an IT consultant,

describes it as a "living hell". He's due back in court next month

to learn if the restriction on his sex life will be dropped

or made into a full order He's been speaking exclusively

to us this morning. First of all, thank you very much

for talking to us. We really appreciate your time. Why have you

had this sexual risk order served upon you? This is the mystery that

me and my lawyers have been trying to figure out. We were amazed that

the police maybe application after a unanimous acquittal of the only

crime I've ever been accused of. We think it is sour grapes. They lost

in court. They didn't just lose, they were humiliated in court for

having utterly failed to do any detective work. But it must have

been explained to you when it was served upon you why. What did they

tell you? The reasons are... To get an SRO, you need an act of a sexual

nature which necessitates the risk order. The act on which they rely

are scratching and biting during sex. Consensual sex? Yes. If that

necessitates a sexual risk order, they're going to have to be writing

an awful lot of sexual risk orders. I would suspect the majority of the

population is going to be subject to a sexual risk order. The real reason

is, they lost the trial and they're misusing this new set of laws to

effectively put me on a retrial for rape after an acquittal, because it

is the same evidence, it is the same witnesses, it is just a retrial in

miniature. Have you had sex with anyone since this order was imposed

upon you? No. If you break the order, breach the order, by having

sex with someone without telling the police first, what could happen to

you? If I breach any part of the order, not just the 24 hour notice

part, I will potentially go to prison for five years and,

regardless of what the breaches, I am actually accused of a breach, but

regardless of what the breach is, I become a convicted sex offender,

even if the breach wasn't a sexual act. So, for instance, the breach

I'm accused of is refusing to hand over my PIN number to my iPhone.

That act will get me five years in jail and makes me a convicted sex

offender. It's obscene, it's ridiculous. First of all, SROs can't

have obligations. By prohibitive orders. I've been obliged unlawfully

by this order to provide information to the police. I sought legal advice

with my lawyers, who checked with other lawyers, we made absolutely

sure this wouldn't be a breach and after I got back advice, I'm

accused. I was thrown in jail, charged and on the 19th of August, I

will have a trial and if I lose, for that act, I become a convicted sex

offender. It is utterly ridiculous. If you were to disclose to the

police that you were going to have sex with someone 24 hours later,

what information would you have to give them? I have to give name,

address and date of birth. Of? Of any woman that I intend to have any

sexual contact with. It is broader than just having sex. What does it

include? It's ridiculous. Sexual conversation would be included.

Kissing is included. It is so sweeping, it's ridiculous. It is so

badly worded. I could breach this order by accident. How? If I have a

sexual conversation, the police could come along and say, "Right,

that's sexual contact". And with the PIN number, me and my lawyers had

100% consensus that this wasn't a breach. I was arrested anyway. You

can get arrested by accident with these orders. Except part of the

restrictions are on mobile phone use and internet use. And that's the

most damaging part of this. You have reported the 24 hour at sex

noticed... That headline grabbing part I understand that is what the

bill want to read about but that's not the most damaging part from my

point of view. The most damaging part is the making available on

request clause any communications device that I use. Effectively that

means, if I don't own the device and carry it with me 24 hours a day, I

can't use it. You can see how you would breach the order by not giving

the police your mobile phone PIN number because they need to be able

to access it. At SROs are only supposed to be prohibitive, they are

not allowed to require me to do anything. But if there are

conditions attached, you know what the conditions are and it's up to

you whether to breach them not. That's one of the conditions, mobile

phone restrictions. They didn't actually say that at the time of the

breach, the wedding was changed thereafter. At the time of the

alleged breach, it didn't say I had to provide that. It does now but as

I say, it is an obligation, which is unlawful. You are not supposed to be

able to do this with an SRO. If you were to provide the police with a

woman's name, address and date of birth, what would they do with that

information? In theory, there is a disclosure document and what they do

is, they will go around and say," this person is subject to something

called a sexual risk order, he is considered to be potentially

dangerous," and then they ask that want to sign a form and leave and

that's it. So can you imagine the horror of that? You've just met

someone and you are at the point where you are deciding whether to

date and then that happens. Convicted criminals don't get these

types of orders. It's obscene. The reason that the police may tell

a potential partner of yours that you are dangerous because the judge

at the end of your second trial when you were acquitted said although

this has has been acquitted, it is my judgment that he is a very

dangerous man? Two things, we don't know what he was referring to. It

was clear during the trial that he, like a lot of people, just didn't

understand S and M at all. Tell us about the nature of the

conversations you had with medical professionals, conversations which

emerged during your trial? Yeah, I told one of my GPs about a partner

that I had and she completely misunderstood. The medical

professional? Yes. In what way? She didn't contextualise any of the acts

as S and M or in anyway consensual and she missed out large portions of

what I'd said. So you had talked about consensual sexual activity and

talked about safe words? I made that crystal clear. Had you also talked

about rape fantasies? Yeah, exactly and I said this was role-play rape.

She just wrote down rape. She didn't say anything about role-play and

initially didn't say anything about safe words. Just explain to our

audience what safe words are about? If you don't know what a safe word

is, OK, if you're engaging in some kind of S and M activity you use a

safe word which is a neutral word to indicate that you want your partner

to stop. So green for instance would be a common safe word. And that

means stop because obviously if you are enacting a role-play rape, no

doesn't mean no. Stop doesn't mean stop. So you need this neutral word

or sometimes it is a snap fingers for instance if you're gagged or

hooded or something. So safe word isn't always a word. So those

conversations emerged during your trial and you believe that may have

led the judge in part to describe you as a dangerous man despite the

acquittal? I can only assume that. We don't know because the judge was

not specific at all about what he meant. We don't know what the judge

meant, but we do know because of the original trial that nobody that read

those medical notes thought it was S and M, not one person read that

document and thought there was anything consensual because there

was not a single shred of context in that document. It simply said,

"Rape." Are you a dangerous man? No. In no respect, no. I have been

accused of precisely one crime in my entire 45 years and I was

unanimously acquitted. Last Thursday, your identity was

revealed. What impact has that had upon you? Well, this has been

devastating for people around me. The first thing that happened was

my... My children won't speak to me now. They've deleted me from

Facebook. One of my friends has been threatened with being fired just

because she knows me. We've had journalists offering money to female

friends to say that I've done something to them and the worse the

claim they make, the more money they're offered. It's, on a personal

level, it is devastating, absolutely devastating. Have you tried to get

in touch with your children? I spoke to their mother and we think the

best thing to do is just let the shock die down for a while. Why do

you think they have deleted you on Facebook? How horrific must this be?

Seeing your father and his sexual orientations

spread across the internet, awful. Awful. You mentioned the further

hearing in August which will decide whether the sexual risk order will

be dropped or extended for a period of time. How do you try and get one

of these orders overturned? Well, the interim orders are very, very

easy to get. So the standard evidence... The standard order that

you're on? The standard of evidence is very low, you have a chat with a

magistrate and if there is any scary comments at all, they issue the

order. But you are supposed to have the full hearing within a few weeks

thereafter, that has not happened in my case. It will happen in August.

It will happen in August. How do you get that order removed? Effectively,

we are going to have the rape trial in miniature again. In a

Magistrates' Court again? In a Magistrates' Court, it is the same

witnesses, it is a repeat of the rape trial. So how will you try and

get it overturned? We're in a position now there is no presumed

innocence, I have to prove my innocence. It is that ridiculous.

After I have already been acquitted, I still effectively stand accused of

exactly the same thing, but in a Magistrates' Court which does not

afford you the same opportunity for a defence. It was half day. If that.

Whereas trial took five days to unpick. It is a very complicated

case. So what could you do, promise to be sell bait for the rest of your

life? Well, that presumes some kind of guilt. Why should I make that

promise, that presumes some manner of gill. The only time you have a

presumption of innocence if there is a jury. The system does not presume

innocence, the system presumes guilt. The system, the courts, they

all presume guilt, but the new laws are effectively allowing the lower

courts and the maj straights court to try very serious crimes by

pretending that it is not a retrial. These laws are dangerous, extremely

dangerous and they allow the police to ignore a verdict. Thank you very

much for talking to us. Thank you. Thank you for your time. You're

welcome. We will talk to an ex-lawyer and

Police and Crime Commissioner for Northumbria about sexual risk

orders. Grace says even if he can't tell people his fannies, women

interacting should be made aware. He will suffer more if he ends up in

prison because he loses control. This tweet, "If you are innocent

then a sexual risk order is an affront to civil liberties." Jeremy

says, "I'm gobsmacked by this 24-hour sex notice case. It is craze

crisis." Leo says SRO s are just one of the laws our so-called safe pair

of hands Prime Minister, oh bonkers, sexual risk orders are one of the

bonkers law our Prime Minister has brought in as the Home Secretary."

Ann says, "This sounds like the police state. Britain." A couple

more as well. Ian, "I could understand the restrictions if he

was a convicted sex offender, but he was found not guilty. It doesn't

make sense." Ann says, "If he was that dangerous, why wasn't he locked

up? The order doesn't seem to make sense." We will discuss that more in

the next hour of the programme. The International Olympic

Committee is meeting today to decide whether the entire

Russian team should be banned from the upcoming

Olympic Games next month. We'll talk to athletes who say

they should be banned Let's get the latest weather

update with Stav Danaos. Are we officially in a heatwave? The

official definition of a heatwave is four or five consecutive days of

heat and consecutive hot nights. No reprice from the heat which prompts

authorities to issue the heat warning. So we have got a brief

heatwave at the moment and today we are seeing the peak of the heat as

things will be cooling down afterwards. Lots of gorgeous Weather

Watcher pictures coming in of that beautiful blue sky. The reason for

it, the heat, source has been across Spain and France and this area of

high pressure has been pumping it northwards across the UK and it is

today like I mentioned we will see a pack of this short-lived heatwave.

Temperatures maybe the mid- maybe higher, 35 Celsius across parts of

the Midlands. So a very hot afternoon in store, seeing

temperatures around the mid-20 Celsius across the South East.

Through the afternoon, the high 20s, the low 30s, widely, we could see

34, 35 Celsius between London and in towards the Perthshire area. Maybe

30 Celsius across Scottish Borders and in the south. Hot and sunny for

Northern Ireland and the heat pumping north in towards Northern

Scotland. We could see 20 Celsius for Lerwick. A hot and sunny

afternoon and humid too. But that means one thing as we head on in

towards this evening and overnight, an area of low pressure means we

will see thunderstorms developing. Northern and West Wales and Northern

Ireland and severe ones, north-west England in towards Scotland by the

end of the night. Large hail. Temperatures will be very hot and

sticky. A very uncomfortable night to come. Wednesday, a thundery start

to the day across Northern Ireland and parts of north-west Wales,

north-west eng gln and Southern Scotland, severe thunderstorms

possible, frequent lightening, torrential rain. Then we see another

cluster of thunderstorms develop. Elsewhere, there will be sunshine

around. A cooler fresher feel to Scotland and Northern Ireland. Still

warm for England and Wales, but the heatwave, the second day of the

heatwave continues in towards East Anglia and the South East of

England. By Thursday though, the hot air would have been pushed off into

the near Continent and we start to see the Atlantic air pushing in.

Temperatures returning to near normal I should say for the time of

year. Temperatures in the north and the west the high teens Celsius and

the low 20 Celsius across the south and the east and with it will come a

few showers, but some sunshine. After this brief, very hot snap, it

looks like temperatures returning to near normal by the end of the week.

Good morning. It is Tuesday. It is just before 10am. This morning, an

exclusive report on the Isle of Wight five. A group of fishermen

convicted of smuggling ?53 million worth of cocaine. But could new

evidence suggest they're innocent? Well, this chart would have been

really report to the jury in reaching a conviction. What it

purports to show is the fishing vessel coming across the track of

the container vessel as it moved up the English Channel and that the

police insisted showed that it was possible for drugs to have been

transferred from the container vessel on to the fishing vessel.

We will talk to the daughter of one of the men convicted and to the

lawyer you saw there representing them. Plus, in the last hour, we

brought you an exclusive interview with a 45-year-old father of two

from Yorkshire who is banned from having sex unless he gives the

police 24 hours notice. Are you a dangerous man? No. In no respect,

no. I have been accused of precisely one crime in my entire 45 years and

I was unanimously acquitted. Before 11am, we will find out more about

the sexual risk orders. So many of you getting in touch about the

interview. This comment on whatsapp, "Bravo for the interview with John

O'Neill. Hopefully this goes some way to repairing his life and

reputation. Sad to see an innocent man treated worse than a criminal."

Good morning. Welcome to the programme. It is time for the news

and here with a summary is Anita. Good morning. MPs have voted to

approve the renewal of the Trident nuclear weapon system. There was a

majority of 355 in favour after more than half of Labour voters voted for

the deterrent and against their leader Jeremy Corbyn. During the

debate one Labour MP called his stance jewel Nile. A hand painted

flag of Islamic State has been found at the home of a 17-year-old Afghan

refugee who attacked several people with an axe and a knife on a train

in Germany. The teengeary was shot dead by police during the attack.

Two of those injured are in a critical condition. The teenager who

had claimed asylum after travelling to Germany had been living with a

foster family. IS is claiming it was behind the attack.

Theresa May is holding her first Cabinet meeting as Prime Minister.

Mrs May is expected to set out her priorities including leaving the EU

during the meeting ahead of visits it Germany and France later in the

week. It has been a raucous start to the

Republican Convention that will confirm Donald Trump as the party's

presidential candidate. There were rowdy scenes when a group of

delegates were refused permission to register their opposition to Mr

Trumpment later, he inte viewed his wife and through the night a series

of his supporters including former Mayor of New York, made speeches on

safety and security. It's time to make

America safe again. What happened to "There's no

black America, there's no white America,

there is just America"? A legal charity says there's

evidence of a miscarriage of justice in the drug-smuggling convictions

of a group of fishermen In an exclusive report,

this programme investigates who were sentenced to up to 24 years

in jail for a plot involving nearly We've found changed stories

and damaged evidence. A man who has to give police 24

hours' notice before having sex with a woman for the first time

has told this programme 45-year-old John O'Neill has been

placed on a sexual risk order after being found

not guilty of rape. But North Yorkshire Police applied

for the order after the court was told he had a fascination

with rape fantasies and was "a very He's given this programme

an exclusive interview. I have to give name, address and

date of birth. Of? Of any woman that I intend to have any sexual contact

with, it's broader than just having sex. What does it include? It's

ridiculous. Sexual conversation would be included. Kissing is

included. It's so sweeping, it's ridiculous. It's so badly worded, I

could breach this order by accident. Los Angeles police are investigating

after a Playboy model publicly shared a photograph of another woman

naked in a gym changing room. Captioned "if I can't unsee this

then you can't either", Dani Mathers posted the image beside one

of herself covering her She later apologised,

saying she thought the Snapchat post It's illegal in California to share

a person's naked image She's also come in for a major

social media backlash. That's a summary of the latest BBC

News - more at 10.30. Do get in touch with us

throughout the morning - If you text, you will be charged

at the standard network rate. The BBC's had it confirmed

in the last hour that Hull boss Steve Bruce had an interview

for the vacant England Sunderland boss Sam Allardyce also

held talks last week. More on that throughout

the day as we get it. Chris Froome can enjoy today's rest

day at the Tour de France, with his lead of nearly two

minutes still intact. Peter Sagan won yesterday's stage

in the Swiss capital Berne, but two-time winner Froome crossed

the line in 13th to maintain his There are now four days of racing

before the final stage Froome is the race favourite,

but isn't taking Other teams have said

they're going to attack next week in the Alps,

this week in the Alps, sorry. So to say that the Tour's won,

and I don't have any James Anderson, Ben Stokes

and Adil Rashid have all been added to the England squad for the second

test against Pakistan, Anderson missed the opening

test defeat at Lord's because he was injured, but is

expected to return at Old Trafford - The Lancashire bowler's recall comes

after he was knocked off the top of the test bowling rankings

by Yasir Shah - what a game he had in the first match,

taking ten wickets. Fresh from his Wimbledon

heroics just nine days ago, Andy Murray has decided not

to defend his Rogers Cup title Murray has not played since beating

Milos Raonic to clinch the title for the second time,

and watched as Great Britain won their Davis Cup tie

against Serbia in Murray will train in Majorca before

defending his Olympic What about Northern Ireland

striker Will Grigg? He's earned his place among

the best players in Europe. And did it without making a single

appearance at Euro 2016! In a vote by journalists,

he received as many votes as France's famed

midfielder Paul Pogba. Not taking anything away

from Grigg's ability, but maybe it had more to do

with a song that was sung in his honour by fans

throughout the tournament. It's called Will Grigg's On Fire,

and even his team mates had a go. # Will Grigg's on fire

# Your defences terrified # Will Grigg's on fire

# Your defence is terrified # Will Grigg's on fire

# Your defence is terrified #. No, thank you. I've heard enough of

it. You can see why they are professional footballers and not

professional singers! Welcome to the programme. So many of

you are getting in touch about the man who has had a sexual risk order

imposed on him after he was acquitted of rape. He described the

devastating impact this has had on his life, including the fact that

his two children now don't speak to him. They live abroad and have

deleted from Facebook. This tweet from Mark, "I am trying to work out

how such a court order is even police double". A very good

question, which we will ask a Police and Crime Commissioner. This tweet

from Mary, "Regardless of what this man may do in the future, if he was

found not guilty, why put in place this order? Also his identity should

be protected". Janet says, "I cannot believe what is happening to this

man". Steve says, "This is a joke. A bloke into S has to tell the

police when he is going to have sex? It's like a police state". Amy says,

"I agree with the order that been imposed. The end of his trial said

he was dangerous". And this tweet, "The fact that this man is having to

defend himself on national TV is amazing". More on that later. We'll

talk to a Police and Crime Commissioner for Northumbria. , also

a former lawyer. Next on the programme, state-sponsored doping on

an unprecedented scale. -- scale. The IOC is meeting today to discuss

whether the entire Russian team should be banned from the games next

month. It is after Russia was found to have planned doping across 30

sports from late 2011, including the build-up to London 2012 and white

through the Saatchi 2014 winter games. Here's how they did it.

It was a huge and audacious programme of deception, involving

everyone from Russia's sports ministry to the FSB security

service, formerly known as the KGB. The goal was to make you samples

that tested positive for drugs disappear. From late 2011 to 2015.

It was in order to improve Russia's sporting performance to drop the man

involved in Wada's investigation called this the disappearing

positive methodology but when that wasn't enough to hide doping, such

as at the Olympics in Sochi, a more elaborate plan was carried out.

Before competing at the games, athletes would give clean you're in

samples, when performance enhancing drugs were not a system. These

samples would be stored in the freezer by Russian authorities,

allowing athletes to resume doping in the run-up to the games. While at

the games, the Russian competitors would give you running samples in

the usual way, watched by an independent doping control officer.

Those samples were then smuggled out of the laboratory at night through

mouse holes between rooms, literally a hollow. They were taken away by

agents working for the FSB who were disguised as sewer engineers. The

samples were removed in a manner which didn't break the seal,

allowing the contaminated sample of you're in to be replaced with the

previously frozen clean sample which, in one final piece of

espionage was passed back to the lab to be tested. The report found 580

positive tests were covered up across 30 different sports, but that

it is probable Professor McLaren had only skimmed the surface of doping

cases. The Russian ministry of sport directed, controlled and oversaw the

manipulation of athletes' results, through sample swapping and the act

of participation and assistance of the FSB, CSP and both Moscow and

Sochi laboratories. I think that athletes going to the Olympics and

number of sports, they need to know they are competing on a level

playing field so if they were competing against somebody in a

Russian Olympic best, there was always going to be that shadow of a

doubt, whether they are competing cleanly. So I think the IOC does

need to stand very firm on this. There are few nations to have won

more medals than Russia. The IOC's decision later today will determine

whether it can add to the tally in Rio. So should all Russian athletes

automatically be banned from Rio? Regardless of whether they were

known to dive bomber? Yesterday we had some of Britain's's greatest

Olympic and Paralympic athletes on the programme. This is what they

told... It is a huge decision. I don't envy the man that has to make

that final call but there has to be a line drawn at some stage. Should

the clean ones be banned? Yeah, ban them. They're tainted by the state

programme, so it's almost like you have to get rid of everybody because

you don't know who is not cheating so everyone is guilty by

association. You've got to draw the line somewhere and I think because

the Russians have proved what they are doing now, they that Chile

proved that the laboratories and things like that, and it's like a

drug feed. I think if you are going to just tap in and say, you are

going to be banned but not you, I think it is there now. The evidence

is there and I just think there should be a total ban in the sense

of everybody and set that example, set that standard, because you've

got to do that because how else are you going to try? It's so many

different sports. We have a couple of boxes who also failed. The bad

thing for these athletes, what they don't realise, is that these drugs

are really bad for you long-term. They're really destroying their

bodies, taking it, to get this unfair advantage. I don't understand

the logic at all. Let's speak to John Brewer, a professor of sports

science at Saint Mary's University and also a board member of UK

Anti-Doping. He is talking to us today in a personal capacity. Good

morning to you. Your reaction to the Canadian lawyer report yesterday? I

think it is a very sad day for sport and it shows that there are real

issues within Russia that need to be addressed and there are some very

tough and difficult decisions that the authorities will need to take

with regard to Russia's observation in the other big games. Before we

talk about that immense decision that they have to take, what struck

you most about the scale and depth of the cheating going on in Russia?

It is shock as much as anything. For some time we've had an indication

that there was fairly systemic doping going on within Russia that

clearly has caused major issues and we've been addressing the issues

with regard to the athletes. I think what it also shows is that

regardless of the outcome of this decision, there is a real need now

to work with the Russians on the Russian authorities to rehabilitate

them and to install a system within Russia that is one that all of us

involved in sport throughout the world want to see because if we just

ostracise them and kick them into touch altogether, things will only

get worse, so there is now a really big job of work to do, which is to

work with the Russians, with the athletes, the coaches and the

authorities to make sure going forward we have a system that is

clean within Russia and the rest of the world. Is there any

responsibility on Wada, the world anti-doping agency, on whose watch

this was going on? In some ways very some encouragement that this has

been exposed so I think there will be some retrospective looking at

decisions that were taken. I was the governing body of British skiing and

snowboarding during the Sochi Olympics, where a lot of the

evidence is suggesting that there were adverse practices going on. We

had athletes who were deprived of medals or deprived of medal winning

opportunities because retrospectively we see that they may

well have been Russians involved and ( as is. So I think the most

important thing is that we have to protect the right for athletes to

compete clean. At our university we have around 12 athletes associated

with the University who will be competing at the Rio Olympics and

they want to know that when they line up on the start line or the

swimming pool that they are competing against others who are

clean. And people watching around the world want to know that. What

about clean Russian athletes? Should they be allowed to compete or at

least to be able to show to the IOC, here are all my you're in samples,

there is no issue here. There is evidence to suggest they are clean

but we have seen a precedent where we've seen relay teams where there

has been four athletes competing in the relay, one athlete has tested

positive and unfortunately for the other three they've been stripped of

their medals and it may well be that there is a tough price to pay for

those within the Russian system, athletes who we know our band, who

are unable to compete in the London external of wrongdoing of others. If

the IOC do come to that decision and may not be today, it may be after

they've allowed any potentially clean athletes to put evidence

forward, would that be the right decision, if they ban all Russian

athletes from competing at Rio? I would emphasise again that I is

speaking personally. My view is that the evidence suggests that because I

know as a scientist you've taken drugs, you still have a long-term

benefit from those drugs, so even if you've stopped now and you go out

and compete in a few weeks, I would not be surprised if the whole of the

Russian squad were banned and I suspect that for the long-term

integrity of sport, that may well be the correct decision to take. You

will note that President Putin and the Kremlin are saying that this is

about politics, this is political interference, and they've issued a

statement this morning, "We stand against doping".

It is easy to say the words, the evidence maybe something different

and I will come back to the point I made earlier, we have to protect the

right of our athletes to compete in a clean environment and I have seen

the dedication and hard work that so many of our athletes across a range

of sports put into compete at the highest level for their country at

an Olympic Games. And they have to have the assurance that they are in

an environment that is as clean as possible. I think it would be naive

to say that it will be totally clean, but when we see evidence that

would suggest they are in an environment where athletes they are

up against may have previously doped and reaped the benefits of that or

perhaps have been doping up until recently then I think we have to

take tough and indeed difficult decisions. This tweet, "Russian

doping is a disgrace and zero tolerance should be the attitude."

Davis says, "Continued contempt from the Russians, not just in sport, but

in its general attitude towards rules. We need it make an example of

them." Bruce says, "Russia should be permanently removed from the IOC, if

Russian athletes aren't good enough, they should be under a different

flag." Another one from Sandra, "We love bashing the Russians, it is not

as if we don't have drug cheats in our own back yard." We need to make

sure that we work with them to put the right practises and the right

regime in place. Do you think if it was a life ban, that would be the

ultimate deterrent? I think you are talking about a life ban for

individual athletes of the tweet there was suggesting that the

Russians should be banned for a long period of time. I think we have

moved a long way to the extension of the ban for an athlete who tests

positive to make it four years and lifetime for a second offence,

that's a positive step. Most importantly, as a sports scientist,

I am encouraged about the advances in science that enable us to test

samples, eight, tense years afterwards. It is amazing, but even

with the advances in science, the cheats are always a step ahead?

That's why we need too to keep investing in the science. If we

throw our hands up and say we will never win, things are only going to

get worse. It is important we fund the anti doping agencies and fund

the scientific research. Despite their failures? Or the fact that we

are picking up cheats I would suggest is in a sense a positive

news and we are, I think, in a situation now where anybody who win

as medal, who has in the past cheated and taken a banned substance

cannot sleep lightly and can always look over their shoulder and suspect

they might get a test that strips that medal from them five or ten

years down the line. I am encouraged about the world we are moving into.

Thank you. This 45-year-old father of two is

banned from having sex unless he gives the police 24 hours notice.

Those are the terms of a sexual risk order imposed on him.

MPs have voted by a margin of four to one to renew the Trident

60% of Labour MPs voted in favour of Trident

We'll look at what this means for Labour in just a moment,

Trident is the name of the UK's nuclear weapons system. The system

is made up of four sur Marines, 58 Trident nuclear missiles and a

stockpile of over 200 nuclear warheads. Trident miss iletion

carried on the submarines are 18 times more powerful than the bomb

than drop on Hiroshima. The submarines were built between 1986

and 1999. They are old and need replacing. Doing that will cost ?31

billion over 35 years. That's about 0.2% of total Government spending.

Protesters argue keeping nuclear weapons costs too much money.

Keeping nuclear warheads could lead to accidents and they say it makes

the UK more unsafe. Those in favour of Trident think it

makes us safer because it is a deterrent.

Nine countries have nuclear weapons including Russia, Pakistan, and

North Korea. We can talk now to Ryan Ramsey

a former Submarine Commander in the Navy's attack fleet

who trained others to captain the Trident submarines

and Rear Admiral John Gower, a former assistant chief of defence

staff for nuclear deployment. Welcome both of you. Ryan Ramsay,

you completed underwater training missions on Trident submarines.

Describe for our audience the submarine? It is a huge vessel. It

is impressive technology wise. And it is impressive piece of equipment

that's taken out to sea providing the deterrents that the UK needs.

More importantly as the crews that operate it, so keeping that going

24/7, 365 requires highly skilled operators, people who can make

decisions and people who can lead and people who can follow and they

do that effectively. Tell us about the responsibility you feel on

taking a nuclear powered submarine to sea? It is a huge responsibility

of taking any warship or submarine to sea. It is about achieving

political effect. It is about achieving strategic effect, but

importantly, it is about bringing your crews home safely as well. So

taking your crews off in the nobbling that you might go to war --

knowledge that you might go to war is a huge responsibility, but it is

a prif leubleg and one I enjoyed. Much of the time though, life must

ablittle mundane on a submarine? I describe it as 60% of boredom,

mundane, day-to-day stuff and then 40% of adrenalin rush and actually

managing it your team to be able to do that on a ballistic missile

submarine for up to 90 to 100 days is a huge challenge and for some of

the attack submarines that go on deployments of 300 days that's a

huge challenge for the leadership team. I think you spent nearly a yor

at one stage under the ocean. How do you deal with that? Days roll into

days, but the tasking that attack submarines have varies a lot so

there is always a new challenge. By focussing on the near term with a

longer term focus on making sure you bring the submarine back after 386

days away that keeps you focussed. We think nine countries have nuclear

weapons. As a deterrent, does Trident work? Yes, I mean the

deterrent worked fielded by ourselves, France and United States,

we haven't had a nuclear weapon used in anger since 9th August 1945. And

so to say that the deterrent doesn't work isn't correct, it works every

day. Sorry, yes? I have messages from viewers saying what use is

Trident when we have lorries being used as weapons these days? Well,

Trident has never and is never meant to deter terrorism or other threats

that are not nuclear. Trident is there to assure and guarantee the

security of the United Kingdom and her allies through the Nato alliance

against the most extreme of threats. Either direct attack with nuclear

weapons or the use of nuclear weapons to coerce and certainly the

behaviour of Russia over Ukraine and her blatant nuclear saibor rattling

over the last two years has shown that this threat is not some relic

of a bygone era. This is here today, but there is no case made for

Trident to prevent against terrorism and therefore, to say it doesn't

prevent against terrorism to get rid of it is fa she shoulds. Trident did

not stop Russia going into Ukraine? No, but that was not a nuclear

threat. It is not panacea against all things, but it is a panacea

against Russia using nuclear weapons. Ryan Ramsay you were

captain of a number of attacked submarines. What is the difference

between those and the Trident programme? I was the captain of one

nuclear attack sub marred rern. The difference is the size. The

ballistic missile submarine is five times larger than the attack

submarine. The tasking is different as well. So the attack submarine is

about intelligence gathering, almost a first line of defence for the

United Kingdom and using tomorrow owe hawk missiles when required.

Adding to the first line by deterrence itself. Ryan Ramsay and

you heard from Rather Admiral John Gower.

A hand-painted flag of so-called Islamic State has been found

in the room of a teenage Afghan asylum seeker who attacked

passengers on a train in Germany with an axe.

Our correspondent Damien McGuinness is in Berlin.

Tell us more about what happened last night. Well, it was quite a

horrific attack for those on the train Victoria. Apparently what

happened is the young man was-weeks-olding an axe and a knife

-- wielding an axe and a knife and started attacking passengers

viciously particularly a Chinese family who were travelling on the

train. He attacked people in the stomach and on the head with the axe

and then one of the passengers pull the emergency chord, the train

ground to a halt and the attacker fled the scene as it happens, there

was a special Commando armed unit of German police nearby. They chased

after the perpetrator. They tracked him down. In the conflict that

ensued the attacker tried to attack the police officers who then shot

him dead. So the situation right now is that five people in total were

injured. Four of them seriously and two of them are still in a critical

condition. So it is a very serious attack, indeed, but the real

question is what's the motivation behind the attack because this young

man was a 17-year-old Afghan who had come here as an asylum seeker two

years ago to Germany, what his motivation was is going to have a

big impact as to what that means for wider society as a whole here in

Germany. Now that the flag has been found, what are people saying about

that? Well, of course, now police are investigating whether this is in

fact an Islamist extremist attack and so-called Islamic State has

claimed responsibility for the attack. They say that this young man

was in fact one of their followers. Police are treating all of this with

some caution including claims by one eyewitness that the man shouted out,

"Allah is great." In Arabic as he carried out the attack. Police can't

confirm that's true, but they are treating it now as a potential

Islamist extremist attack and the reason why problematic, it will

increase fears about potential lone wolf attacks and particularly in

neighbouring France we have had a couple of extreme terror attacks

over the past year. Germany is already nervous that something

similar could happen. It is problem attic because of the migrant crisis.

In 2015 Germany took in more than one million migrants and refugees

that was very controversial. Many people here supported Angela

Merkel's stance on refugees, but many people objected to it. It

really divided the country. Since the beginning of the year, numbers

have gone down. So that has meant that actually that debate seems to

have calmed somewhat, but the attack last night has really sparked off

that debate and shown that the division in society over Angela

Merkel's stance on refugees is still very much there.

Thank you very much, Damien McGuinness in Berlin.

A group of fishermen and colleagues

convicted of smuggling ?53 million worth of cocaine.

Could new evidence suggest they're innocent?

We'll talk to the daughter of one of the men convicted

This father of two is banned from having sex unless he gives the

police 24 hours notice because of a sexual risk order that has been

imposed upon him. We'll talk about the orders in much more detail and

whether they have a role to play in protecting people. This e-mail from

Michael, "What has become of our justice system when a guy acquitted

of rape is open to further punishment for a crime at the didn't

commit and is now on TV having his entire personal private sexual life

opened up. The rule is ridiculous. The man is innocent. He should be

able to live his life freely without this attention." This tweet, "This

is fascinating. I had no idea things like this could happen in this

country." Susan said, "I disagreed with this order at first, but he

openly admits rape fantasies so prevention is sensible." Jan says,

"Just because he is into S and M, it doesn't make him a rapist. He is

guilty of enjoying sexual pleasure like 99% of all human beings."

Graham says, "The judge surely wouldn't describe him as a dangerous

man if it were not a fair assessment of his character based on the

evidence put before the court." This text says, "I'm disgusted by the way

this man has been treated. We truly are living in a police state. Have

the police got nothing better to do ie catching criminals?"

Here's Annita in the BBC Newsroom with a summary of today's news.

A hand-painted flag of the terror group so-called

at the home of a 17-year-old Afghan refugee who attacked several

people with an axe and a knife on a train in Germany.

The teenager was shot dead by police during the attack near the southern

Two of those injured are in a critical condition.

The teenager, who had claimed asylum after travelling to Germany

as an unaccompanied minor, had been living with a foster family.

IS is now claiming it was behind the attack.

MPs have voted overwhelmingly to approve a renewal of the Trident

There was a majority of 355 in favour, after more

than half of Labour MPs voted for the deterrent and against their

During the debate, one Labour MP called his stance "juvenile

Theresa May is holding her first cabinet meeting

Mrs May is expected to set out her priorities,

including leaving the EU, during the meeting, ahead

of visits to Germany and France later in the week.

It's been a raucous start to the Republican convention that

will confirm Donald Trump as the party's

There were claims that part of a keynote speech by Donald Trump's

wife Melania was strikingly similar to Michelle Obama was both speech

eight years ago. Mrs Trump, who was born in Slovenia, said she has as

little help as possible to write the speech, which stressed family

values. A legal charity says there's

evidence of a miscarriage of justice in the drug-smuggling convictions

of a group of fishermen In an exclusive report our programme

investigates the case of the men, who were sentenced to up to 24 years

in jail for a plot involving nearly We've found changed stories -

and damaged evidence. The Russian Olympic committee has

declared this morning that it stands against doping -

but that the fate of honest athletes shouldn't depend

on unproven accusations. It comes as the International

Olympic Committee prepares to decide whether or not to ban ALL Russian

athletes from the games in Rio. Russia is accused of operating

a state-sponsored doping programme for four years across the "vast

majority" of summer The country's track-and-field

team is already banned Join me for BBC Newsroom

Live at 11 o'clock. Jessica has the morning's

sport headlines now. The BBC's had it confirmed

this morning that Hull boss Steve Bruce had an interview

for the vacant England Sunderland boss Sam Allardyce also

held talks last week. More on that as we have a. Hi have

it. Peter Sagan won yesterday's

Tour de France stage But two-time winner Chris Froome

crossed the line in 13th to maintain his grip on the leader's

yellow jersey, and has a lead James Anderson, Ben Stokes

and Adil Rashid have all been added to the England squad for the second

test against Pakistan, Anderson missed the opening

test defeat at Lord's because he was injured, but is

expected to return at Old Trafford - Andy Murray has decided not

to defend his Rogers Cup title The world number two hasn't played

since beating Milos Raonic to win the Wimbledon title

for the second time. Murray will train in Majorca before

defending his Olympic Updates on all those stories

throughout the morning on the BBC News Channel.

Five years ago, a group of family men from the Isle of Wight

were given a combined prison sentence of 104 years

for masterminding a ?53 million cocaine smuggling operation.

But this programme has obtained new evidence which suggests

Our reporter Jim Reed has spent six months following the story.

We bought you his full report an hour ago - here's

A bad recovered and brought the police station. It was one of the

largest drug plots of the decade. In 2010, a quarter of a tonne of

cocaine was found in the sea off the Isle of white. The police said it

had been left there, wrapped around a boy, by a fishing boat which had

picked it up from a container ship in the English Channel. The only

thing of interest we could see were a couple of canisters floating in

the water. At the bags were spotted by a member of the public and these

five men were arrested and convicted. Hello, darling. Most were

local fishermen with families and most serious criminal records. Sue's

husband Jonathan was said to be the organiser of the plot. He is now

serving 24 years in a high security prison in the Midlands. When you

find out what he was being accused of and charged with, what was your

reaction? It was ridiculous. What? It's just a stupid mistake and he'll

be home. But he never came home? Hasn't been home since the 18th of

January 2011. A hi-tech search of the men's boat after they were

arrested could find no trace of the cocaine. All five still maintain

they are innocent, five years after their trial. I wanted to tell you

where I've got to... They are now being represented by the first

charity of its kind in Britain, specialising in miscarriage of

Justice investigations. This chart would have been really important to

the jury in reaching a conviction because what liberal ports to show

is the kissing vessel -- fishing vessel coming across the track. The

police insisted that showed it was possible for drugs to have been

transferred from the container vessel onto the fishing vessel. At

the charity has now commissioned expert review of this data. Emily

Bolton claims it shows the prosecution got it wrong, leaving

out key plot points and using faulty information. If true, it would mean

the pass of the boats were never closer than 100 metres from each

other. A container ship was actually heading further south. The fishing

vessel never intercepted with the trap of the container ship and there

for good not have collected the drugs from the sea in the way that

the police insisted they must've done. The charity claims its work

also proves the drugs could not have been dropped off by the fishing boat

in the bay, as the water there is too shallow and the tide would have

taken the drugs in the opposite direction. That new evidence has

formed part of a submission to the criminal cases review commission,

which must now decide if the men will get a new appeal. The National

Crime Agency, which led the drugs operation in the channel, said it

can't comment while less investigation is ongoing.

Let's speak now to Maisy Green, whose father Jamie Green

was convicted of conspiracy to import cocaine and sentenced

And also to Emily Bolton, who you saw in the film and who has taken

on the case and runs the Centre for Criminal Appeals.

Good morning, both of you. Thank you for coming on the programme. Emily

Bolton, why are you convinced that the prosecution got the plot points

of both the fishing boat and the container ship ran? They got the

plot points of the container ship wrong by misinterpreting a piece of

data and by missing out... It's join the dots exercise. So really simple?

Very basic. They got that wrong and they didn't disclose the information

that would have enabled the defence at trial to work out that it was

wrong. And the GPS data that you have, that you say shows the correct

route of the fishing boat in particular, why is that 100%

accurate? The reason that's accurate is that it's a very sophisticated

device used for fishermen to be able to do their work, go about their

business in the sea, know where they are and come back to their pots and

retrieve them, so it's a very accurately circuit,

state-of-the-art, and exactly what's needed for lobster fishing, which is

how Jamie Green has made living. The two capture police officers that saw

someone on a boat throwing stuff off, maybe six or seven items, we

now know there were 11 bags of cocaine at that freshwater Bay area,

does that really matter whether they saw six or seven or whether it was

12? I think more what matters there is the detail that they missed.

They're not describing the drugs as they were found and they changed

their descriptions to make them match what was actually found. But

it doesn't mean, does it, that the five men could have been the ones

throwing stuff off the side of the boat which could have been cocaine?

It does because if you combine that evidence with the evidence from the

mid-channel, we now know that the two boats didn't intersect and they

basically could not have picked up the bags at the time the police

theorised they were dropped and this is not evidence the jury were able

to hear at trial and it's not evidence that has been heard by the

Court of Appeal and we want to chance to get this evidence in front

of a court as a matter of urgency. Are there any other possible

explanations how, if the boats didn't cross paths, that cocaine

could have ended up on the five men's fishing boat? We checked the

issue of drift and in Jim's PCC bit of information about that. We check

whether the banks could have drifted. We have modelling software

that enables you to look into these things and that also doesn't work.

The bags would have drifted away from the boat, not towards it. There

is no way that your GPS digital tracking could have missed about

going towards the bags of cocaine to pick them up? The GPS digital track

and we have a sour boat, it shows where our boat was and it was not in

the place where it would need to be. Where is this case up to in terms of

you wanting a Court of Appeal hearing? This case is an emergency.

These five men have been imprisoned since 2010 and it is in front of the

Kiro cases review commission, the body set up to investigate suspected

miscarriages of justice. -- criminal cases review commission. But that

body is so underfunded that the cases been an icky of 18 months. We

see our charity as being the ambulance, we go out and pick up the

casualties of justice and we watch them to hospital but when they get

to the Court of Appeal, or the commission can actually do something

about their condition, they are told to wait in a queue. It is like these

cases, these casualties of justice, are bleeding out on a stretcher in a

queue waiting for the urgent treatment they need and that can't

persist and if Theresa May is serious about investigating issues

with police accountability and with our criminal justice system, we need

to see more funding for the institutions that run our appeals

process, the commission and the Court of Appeal. Sydney on Facebook,

and this is representative of a number of comments, says, the

evidence seems... It's just such a coincidence, you know? How are you

so clear that these men are innocent? Once you look at the

evidence in detail, and the fresh evidence that no court has looked at