19/01/2017 Victoria Derbyshire

This morning Theresa May will tell business and political leaders

at the World Economic Forum meeting in the Swiss resort of Davos

It's the Prime Minister's first Brexit speech since she said

on Tuesday that Britain could not possibly stay in the single

Also, are the British press biased against Muslims?

Last month nine articles about Muslims in UK news

outlets were corrected after they were proven to be wrong,

We've been speaking exclusively to the activist waging a war

on the false reporting which he says breeds division across the country.

The Sunday Times article stated in its headline enclaves of Islam and

the UK is 75% Muslim, and it is about to report on integration

across the country. But what the report actually said was one school

had students who thought that the majority of the country were Asian.

Asian rather than Muslim? This year's secondary school league

tables are out shortly, and for the first time,

a new measure is being Attainment 8 assesses each

student's achievement across eight GCSE subjects,

while Progress 8 measures how they progress

through secondary school. The Government's aim is to focus

on pupils' development rather than just exam results,

but will it be any better? Welcome to the programme,

we're live until 11 this morning. Also, has clean eating

become a dirty word? Tonight a BBC programme calls

into question the advice of healthy eating gurus who have been telling

us to eat clean - eating food in its most natural state

and avoiding anything processed. We will be speaking to the Cambridge

scientist taking on the gurus Have you tried clean

eating - are you a fan? Do get in touch on that

and all the stories we're talking about this morning -

use the hashtag #Victorialive and If you text,

you will be charged at the standard Several people have been

killed after a hotel Up to 30 guests and staff

were in the Rigo-piano Hotel on San Grasso mountain

in the central Abruzzo region. The avalanche was triggered

by a series of powerful earthquakes Rescuers are having to ski

to the hotel as roads Let's speak to Andrea

Vogt, a freelance Andrea, what are you hearing about

this? There is a very complex rescue operation under way. As you

mentioned, the first rescuers arrived on skis, and all of the

emergency vehicles have not been able to get through to the site.

There are believed to be up to 30 people, seven staff, and the rest

were guest at the hotel when the earthquake and then the avalanche

hit, so right now several people have been airlifted out with

hypothermia. There were below freezing temperatures during the

night, and the hotel was covered with snow and debris, part of it did

collapse, so very difficult conditions to survive in, and there

are fears that many may have perished after this earthquake

triggered an avalanche. It has just been hammered. Tell us more about

the area. Is it a popular area, a busy area with skiers? No, it is

quite isolated, it is a long the Gran Sasso mountain. Some of these

people may be the people who were displaced by the original

earthquake. One of the first things the rescuers will try to do is to

get to the guest list, but it is a very remote area, mountainous and

remote and difficult to get in. You may be familiar with Amatrice where

the earthquakes hit last August, that church tower collapsed

yesterday, so what we are seeing is many of these buildings that were

made on stable by the first earthquakes are now collapsing

further, so lots of things, many hamlets have not been reached, but

rescuers are focused right now on this hotel that was completely

covered with debris and snow, about four metres of snow on site. Andrea,

thank you very much indeed far dating us. We will keep you updated

with the latest on that. But now let's catch up with the latest news

with Annita in the newsroom. Thank you very much.

Theresa May will tell world leaders in Davos this morning that the UK

It's her first visit to the World Economic Forum as Prime Minister.

Many in the audience will be hostile to her plan to take Britain out

Let's speak to Tanya Beckett in Davos.

Good morning. We heard Theresa May's Brexit speech on Tuesday. Will her

message be slightly different today for this audience? Yes, so she is

talking to a group of people who live and breathe capitalism and

trade, so she has to really set her store as being one which is open for

business. Yes, Britain might be leaving the European Union, however,

it is very much interested in doing deals elsewhere, and in order for

this to work well, for Brexit to work well, that needs to be very

much part of the deal, so she is going to be wanting to talk to banks

who have already said that if Britain is coming out of the single

market, they need to set up subsidiaries, and people have been

long thinking this is the case, with what remains of the EU. She is also

going to want to trade ministers from other countries -- talk to

trade ministers from other countries to do business as soon as they can,

and businesses will welcome what she had to say because it offers them

some degree of certainty, and they like that. Any other snippets that

she could offer in terms of what sort of deal she might do with the

EU would also be welcome. They have to make some practical decisions.

Then she will have to face representatives from other EU

countries, and that might be more tricky. Tanya Beckett in Davos,

thank you for that. We'll bring you that speech live

to you in the next few minutes. This is the scene, the podium where

she will make that speech, and we are expecting that to happen just a

few minutes after half past nine. We will bring that to you live.

There are reports of troops from Senegal entering

Gambia, as the political crisis there escalates.

The defeated President Yayha Jammeh has ignored a midnight deadline

to give way to the winner of last month's election, Adama Barrow.

West African military forces have been preparing to move in to enforce

1,000 British holiday-makers have returned home from Gambia

with the Foreign Office advising against all but essential

Scientists are working to deal with three diseases

they fear could become global health emergencies.

A group of charities and governments is spending more

than 370 million pounds to tackle Middle East Respiratory Syndrome,

A girl who was kidnapped as a baby 18 years ago

has defended the woman who took her from

Lexis Manigo was abducted by Gloria Williams, a woman

Miss Manigo has praised her upbringing by the woman

I understand what she did was wrong, but just look at my life itself, you

know? I understand that one mistake, but it wasn't all bad. Everything

that came out of it was not bad. It would be wrong if I would say, no, I

don't want to get to know them, you know, curiosity, I will get to know

them, of course. . A British man who travelled

to America from the UK to have sex with boys has been sentenced to 13

years in a US prison. 70-year-old Paul Charles Wilkins,

from Cambridgeshire flew to California in January 2016

and was caught in an Bomb disposal teams were called at

almost 600 schools after warnings of a potentially hazardous material

used in chemistry lessons. The army carried out hundreds of controlled

explosions between October and December last year.

Today is Barack Obama's final day in office as Donald Trump

prepares to be sworn in as the 45th US president.

Yesterday, the first lady Michelle Obama,

was captured doing a final lap of the White House, as pictures

In his last press conference as head of state, Mr Obama said he looked

forward to spending more time with his wife and his

Man, my daughters are something. And they just surprise and enchant

and... Impress me more and more every single day as they grow up.

President Obama. That's a summary of the latest BBC

News - more at 9.30. Thank you very much, Annita. Later

in the programme, we will be talking to the finish winner of the X Factor

who has signed a deal with Sony. Lots to come between now and 11,

including a discussion on clean eating. What do you think about

that? Has it changed the way you eat? Do you feel like you should eat

more clean as a result of all the bloggers out there talking about

that? Do get in touch with us

throughout the morning - use the hashtag Victoria live

and If you text, you will be charged Now let's get the sport with Hugh. A

shock at the Australian open? Good morning, Joanna.

A huge shock at the Australian Open in the last hour - defending

He was beaten in five sets by the wild card

and world number 117, Denis Istomin from Uzbekistan.

Istomin took the first set, but Djokovic won the next two.

But he never really looked comfortable.

Istomin then took the fourth in a tiebreak to level

the match, going on to win the deciding set 6-4.

It took 4 hours and 48 minutes, but Istomin

And surely the biggest winner here is Andy Murray,

who's looking to win his first title in Melbourne.

His biggest challenger already out in the second round.

A word on the Brits - Johanna Konta says she's looking

forward to staying in Melbourne for 'as long as possible' -

The British Number One eased to victory over Naomi Osaka

of Japan in straight sets - to reach the third round,

where she'll face former World Number 1 Caroline Wozniaki.

There was bad news though for Heather Watson, defeated

by American qualifier Jennifer Brady.

Kyle Edmund had high hopes, too, but went out in straight sets

No big shocks in last month was Mike FA Cup?

-- last night's FA Cup? No, Jurgen Klopp was mad Liverpool made it

through, but a tinge of regret for Plymouth. Jake Jervis hit the post

of Liverpool in the second half of the replay, however Jurgen Klopp's

men move onto phase Wolverhampton Wanderers at Anfield on the fourth

round. Newcastle and Southampton also went through after their wings

last night. And Manchester United top of one

leak this morning? Yes, better news off the field than

on it, they have become the richest club in football once again for the

first time in 11 years. They go ahead of the European champions rail

-- Real Madrid, third richest is Barcelona. Eight Premier League

clubs make the top 20 of the football money list, including

Leicester City for the first time. And England's cricketers hoping to

level their one-day series with India, they won the toss and have

chosen to bowl, and India are 74-3 after 17 of their 50 overs. Thank

you very much, Hugh. Theresa May is about to

speak to world leaders at the World Economic Forum in Davos

to reassure them that Britain is open for business post

Brexit, let's listen in. Theresa May is preparing for her

speech to world leaders in Davos. He said, you cannot have all the

advantages of being a member of the club if you are outside the club.

Theresa May said earlier in the week that no deal is better than a bad

deal, and the UK will not be a member of the single market going

forward. But she wants the message today to be an outward pitch to the

business leaders who will be there, the trade leaders, that Britain is

open for business, and wants new trade deals

as she looks ahead to global Britain, as she put it in her speech

on Brexit. We are expecting her to start to speak shortly on the

question of trade deals. For trade negotiations cannot begin until...

That is a picture of her earlier in the week with that catchline Global

Britain, but in terms of negotiating trade deals, formal negotiations

cannot begin until the UK is actually out of the European Union.

We are going to be speaking on the programme are little later to the

man widely tipped to be the next US ambassador to the EU, and he has

been speaking about the potential for a UK/ US trade deal which Donald

Trump himself raise just a few days ago, saying the formal negotiations

can't begin, but there is no reason why talks can't start, and he talks

potentially of a time frame of around 90 days to come up with some

sort of a deal, so it will be interesting to talk to him a little

bit later on the programme about that. We are still waiting for

Theresa May, so we will just move on, but we will go back as soon as

she starts to speak. President-elect Donald Trump takes

the oath of office tomorrow and it's thought about 900,000 people

are expected to gather in Washington But his supporters are

already on their way There will be a wreath laying

at Arlington National Cemetery with both Donald Trump and his

Vice President Mike Pence attending. So let's find out a bit more

about what's on the agenda The only thing we have to fear is

fear itself. Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you

can do for your country. The inauguration is being boycotted

by some politicians, and in terms of the numbers going to the

inauguration, around 800,000 to 900,000 are expected to go, but that

compares with double the number actually when Barack Obama was

inaugurated. There has also been a lot made of the fact that various

performers were wanted for events who would not do it and we will be

speaking more about what is planned and what is anticipated on the eve

of Donald Trump's turning from ordinary citizen to the president.

We will be talking to the man who is widely tipped to be the United

States new ambassador to the EU. Theresa May has just arrived on

stage at Davos and so we will listen to her speech.

Thank you for the introduction and thank you for inviting me to speak

here at the World Economic Forum this morning. This is an

organisation that is, as it says in the very first line of your mission

statement, committed to improving the state of the world. Those of us

who meet here are all by instinct and outlook optimists who believe in

the power of public and private cooperation to make the world of

tomorrow better than the world of today. And we are all united in our

belief that that world will be built on the foundations of free trade,

partnership and globalisation. Yet beyond the confines of this hall,

those forces for good that we so often take for granted are being

called into question. The forces of liberalism, free trade and

globalisation that have had and continue to have such an

overwhelmingly positive impact on our world, that have harnessed

unprecedented levels of wealth and opportunity, that have lifted

millions out of poverty around the world, that have brought nations

closer together, broken down barriers and improved standards of

living and consumer choice, forces that underpins the rules -based

international system that is key to global prosperity and security, are

somehow at risk of being undermined. And as we meet here, this morning,

across Europe, parties of the far left and the far right are seeking

to exploit this opportunity. During support by feeding off an underlying

and keenly felt sense among some people, often those on modest to low

incomes, living in relatively rich countries around the West, that

these forces are not working for them. And those parties who embrace

the politics of division and despair, who offer easy answers, who

claim to understand people's problems and always know what and

who to blame, feed of something else as well. The sense among the public

that mainstream political and business leaders have failed to

comprehend there are legitimate concerns for too long. This morning,

I want to set out a manifesto for change, that responds to these

concerns, and shows that the politics of the mainstream can

deliver the change people need. I want to show how, by taking a new

approach, that harnesses the good of what works and what changes -- and

changes what does not we can maintain and can build support for

the rules -based international system. And I want to explain how,

as we do so, the United Kingdom, a country that has so often been at

the forefront of economic and social change, will step up to a new

leadership role as the strongest and most forceful advocate for business,

free markets and free trade anywhere in the world. For that is the unique

opportunity that Britain now has. I speak to you this morning as the

Prime Minister of a country that faces the future with confidence.

For a little over six months ago, millions of my fellow citizens upset

the odds by voting with determination and quiet resolve to

leave the European Union, and embrace the world. Let us not

underestimate the magnitude of that decision, it means Britain must face

up to a period of momentous change. We must go through a tough

negotiation and forge a new Rol for ourselves in the world full of it

means accepting that the road ahead will be uncertain at times, but

believing that it leads towards a brighter future for our country's

children and grandchildren, too. So while it would have been easy for

the British people to shy away from taking such a path, they fixed their

eyes on that brighter future, and chose a bold, ambitious course,

instead, they chose to build a truly global Britain. I know that this and

the other reasons Britain took such a decision is not always well

understood internationally, particularly among our friends and

allies in Europe. Some of our European partners feel that we have

turned our back on them, and I know many fear what our decision means

for the future of the US itself. But as I said in my speech earlier this

week, arid decision to leave the European Union was no rejection of

our friends in Europe with whom we share common interests and values

and so much else. -- our decision. It was no attempt to become more

distant from them, or to seize the corporation that has helped to keep

our continent secure and strong. Nor was it an attempt to undermine the

European Union itself. It remains overwhelmingly and compellingly in

Britain's national interest that the EU as an organisation should

succeed. It would simply restore as we see it Parliamentary democracy

and national self-determination. A vote to take control and make

decisions for ourselves. And crucially, to become even more

global and internationalist in action and in spirit as well.

Because that is who we are, as a nation. Britain's history and

culture is profoundly internationalist. We are a European

country, and proud of our shared European heritage. But we are also a

country that has always looked beyond Europe, into the wider world.

That is why we are among the most racially diverse countries in

Europe, one of the most multicultural members of the

European Union. And why, whether we are talking about India, Pakistan,

Bangladesh, America, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, countries in

Africa, Asia, or those closer to home in Europe, so many of us have

close friends and relatives from across the world. And it is why we

are by instinct a greater global trading nation that seeks to trade

with countries not just in Europe but beyond Europe as well. So at the

heart of the plan, I set out earlier this week, is a determination to

pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement between the UK and

the European Union. But more than that, we seek the freedom to strike

new trade deals with old friends and new allies, right around the world

as well. I am pleased we have already started discussions on

future trade ties with countries like Australia, New Zealand and

India. Countries including China, Brazil and the Gulf states have

already expressed their interest in striking trade deals with us. It is

about embracing genuine free trade, because that is the basis of our

prosperity. But also, the best way to cement the multilateral

partnerships and cooperation that helped to build a better world. For

the challenges we face, like terrorism, climate change and modern

slavery, don't stop at national borders. Nor do they stop at the

borders of continents. The challenges and opportunities before

us require us to look outwards in a spirit of cooperation and

partnership. That is why, as I said in my speech on Tuesday, I want the

UK to emerge from this period of change as a truly global Britain.

The best friend and neighbour to our European partners, but a country

that reaches beyond the borders of Europe, too, a country that gets out

into the world, to build relationships with old friends and

new allies alike. And that is exactly what we are going to do. We

are going to be a confident country, that is in control of its own

destiny once again. It is because of that that we will be in a position

to act in this global role. Because a country in control of its own

destiny is more, not less able, to play a full role in underpinning and

strengthening the multilateral rules -based system. A global Britain is

no less British because we are a hub for foreign investment, indeed, our

biggest manufacturer, Tata, is Indian, and you still cannot get

more British than a Jaguar, or a Land Rover. Britain is no less

British because it is home to people from around the world, in fact, we

derive so much of our strength from our diversity, we are a multiracial,

multiethnic, multi-faith democracy. We are proud of it. Britain is no

less British because we have led the way in multilateral organisations

like the UN, Nato, IMF and the World Bank over many years. Membership of

these bodies over the years magnifies all their members ability

to advance the common goods of peace, prosperity and security. I

believe strongly in a rules -based global order. The establishment of

the institutions that gave effect to it in the mid-20th century was a

crucial foundation for much of the growing peace and prosperity the

world has enjoyed. And the tragic history of the first

half of the last century reminds us of the cost of those institutions'

absence. The litany of follies of that time, the mistakes that we

should never forget and never repeat. So we must uphold the

institutions that enable the nations of the world to work together, and

we must continue to promote international corporation wherever

we can. One example of that is modern slavery. A scourge of our

world, which we can only defeat if we work together. Changing

attitudes, rooting out such abhorrent practices and prosecuting

the perpetrators. That is why at Davos this year I have convened a

high-level panel discussion to continue our co-ordinated effort to

save those many lives which are tragically being stolen.

International cooperation is vital, but we must never forget that our

first responsibility as governments is to serve the people, and it is my

firm belief that we as governments, international institutions, as Mrs

and individuals, need to do more to respond to the concerns of those who

feel that the modern world has left them behind. So in Britain, we have

embarked on an ambitious programme of economic and social reform that

aims to ensure that as we build this global Britain, we are able to take

people with us. A programme that aims to show how a strong Britain

abroad can be a better Britain at home. Because talk of greater

globalisation can make people fearful. For many, it means their

jobs being outsourced and wages undercut. It means having to sit

back as they watch their communities change around them, and in their

minds, it means watching as those who prosper seem to play by a

different set of rules while for many life remains a struggle as they

get by, but don't necessarily get on. And these tensions and

differences are increasingly exposed and exploited through the expansion

of new technologies and the growth of social media. But if we are to

make the case for free markets, free trade and globalisation, as we must,

those of us who believe in them must face up to and respond to the

concerns people have. And we must work together to shape new policies

and approaches that demonstrate their capacity to deliver for all of

the people in our respective countries. I believe this challenge

demands a new approach from government, and it requires a new

approach from business, too. The government, it means not just

stepping back and as the prevailing orthodoxy in many countries has

argued for so many years, not just getting out of the way, not just

leaving businesses to get on with the job and assuming the problems

will just fix themselves. It means stepping up to a new active role

that backs businesses and ensures more people in all corners of the

country share in the benefits of its success. And from business, it means

doing even more to spread those benefits to more people. It means

playing by the same rules as everyone else when it comes to tax

and behaviour. Because in the UK, trust in business runs at just 35%

among those in the lowest income brackets. And it means putting aside

short-term considerations and investing in people and communities

for the long-term. These are all things that I know the vast majority

of businesses do already, not just creating jobs, supporting smaller

businesses, training and developing people, but also by working to give

something back to communities, and supporting the next generation.

Businesses large and small are the back bone of our economies, and

enterprise is the engine of our prosperity. That is why Britain is

and will always be open for business, open to investment in our

companies, infrastructure, universities and entrepreneurs. Open

to those who wants to buy art goods and services, and open to talent and

opportunities from the arts to technology, finance to

manufacturing. But at the same time as promoting this openness, we must

heed the underlying feeling that there are some companies,

particularly those with a global reach, who are playing by a

different set of rules to ordinary working people. So it is essential

for business to demonstrate leadership, to show that in this

globalised world, everyone is playing by the same rules, and that

the benefits of economic success are there for all our citizens. This

work is absolutely crucial if we are to maintain public consent for a

globalised economy and the businesses that operate within it.

That is why I have talked a great deal about our country delivering

yet higher standards of corporate governance to help make the UK the

best place to invest of any major economy. That means several things.

It means businesses paying their fair share of tax, recognising their

obligations and duties to their employees and supply chains, and

trading in the right way. Companies genuinely investing in and becoming

part of the communities and nations in which they operate, and abiding

by the responsibilities that implies. And all of us taking steps

towards addressing executive pay and accountability to shareholders. And

that is why I welcome the World Economic Forum's compact for

responsive and responsible leadership that business leaders are

being asked to sign up to at this conference. It is this change,

setting clear rules for businesses to operate by while embracing the

liberalism and free trade that enable them to thrive, which will

allow us to conserve the ultimate good that is a globalised economy. I

have no doubt at all about the vital role business plays, not just in the

economic life of a nation, but in society, too. But to respond to that

sense of anxiety people feel, I believe we, business and government

working together, need to do even more to make the case. That is why

in Britain we are developing a new, modern, industrial strategy. The

term industrial strategy has fallen into something approaching disrepute

in recent years, but I believe such a strategy that addresses the

long-standing and structural weaknesses in our economy is

essential if we are to promote the benefits of free markets and free

trade as we wish. Our strategy is not about propping up failing

industries or picking winners, but creating the conditions where

winners can emerge and grow. It is about backing those winners all the

waiting courage than to invest in the long-term future of Britain, and

about delivering jobs and economic growth to every community and corner

of the country. We can't leave all of this to international market

forces alone, or just rely on an increase in overall prosperity.

Instead, we have to be practical and proactive. In other words, we have

to step up and take control to ensure that free trade and

globalisation work for everyone. At the same time, we have embarked on

an ambitious agenda of social reform that embraces the same principles.

Active, engaged government that steps up and works for everyone.

Because if you are someone who is just managing, just getting by, you

don't need a government that will get out of the way. You need an

active government that will step up and champion the things that matter

to you. Governments traditionally have been good at identifying, if

not always addressing, the problems and challenges faced by the least

advantage in our societies. However, the mission I have laid out for the

government I lead to make Britain a country that works for everyone goes

further. It is to build something that I have called the shared

society. One that doesn't just value our individual rights, but focuses

rather more on the responsibilities we have to one another. That

respects the bonds that people share, the bonds of family,

community, citizenship and strong institutions. And that recognises

the obligations we have as citizens, obligations that make our society

work. It is these bonds and obligations that make our society

strong and answer our basic human need for definition and identity.

And I am absolutely clear that it is the job of government to encourage

and nurture the Relay ships, networks and institutions that

provide that definition and to correct the injustice and unfairness

that divides us wherever it is found. Too often today, the

responsibilities we have to one another have been forgotten as the

cult of individualism has taken hold. And globalisation and the

democratisation of communications has encouraged people to look beyond

their own communities and immediate networks in the name of joining a

broader global community. To say this is not to argue against

globalisation, nor the benefits it rings. From modern travel and modern

media to new product in our shops and new opportunities for British

companies to export their goods to millions of customers all around the

world. But, just as we need to act to address the deeply felt sense of

economic inequality that has emerged in recent years, so we also need to

recognise the way in which more global and individualistic world can

sometimes loosen the ties that bind our society together, leaving some

people feeling locked out and left behind. I am determined to make sure

that centre ground mainstream politics correspondent to the

concerns people have today. I am determined to stand up for free

markets, free trade and globalisation, but also to show how

these forces can work for everyone. And to do so, I turn to the words of

the 18th-century force of Edmund Burke, who said: A state without the

means of some change is without the means of its own conservation. That

great Conservative principle, change in order to conserve, is more

important than ever in today's Plex geopolitical environment. And I feel

it is of huge relevance to those of us here in Davos this week. And it

is the principle that guides me as I leave Britain through this period of

change. As we build a new, bold, confident, global Britain and shape

a new era of globalisation that genuinely works for all. As we

harness the forces of globalisation, so that the system works for

everyone, and so maintain public support for that system for

generations to come. I want that to be the legacy of our time. To use

this moment to provide responsive, responsible leadership that will

bring the benefits of free trade to every corner of the world, that will

lift millions more out of poverty and towards prosperity, and that

will deliver security, prosperity and belonging for all of our people.

Thank you. APPLAUSE

Theresa May addressing the audience in Davos. Business leaders and trade

leaders among them, and the message that there has been a manifesto for

change, that she wants to put forward the politics of the

mainstream, she says can deliver the change people need. She says that

the UK will be stepping up to a new leadership role as the advocate for

free trade and global markets because the UK now has a unique

position, but she said it is in Britain's national interest that the

EU should succeed. Let's get some reaction to that speech.

We can go live to Norman Smith in Westminster now.

That combination of championing the UK's interests while trying not to

alienate partners in Europe? I thought it interesting, because we

knew that Theresa May was going to stress how Brexit would lead to a

more global, outward looking, confident Britain. What I didn't

expect was so much emphasis on the downside of globalisation and, if

you like, implicit criticism of many of those in her audience who are, if

you like, the international elite, saying in effect that too many

bosses of big companies with global reach were not playing by the rules,

were not paying their fair taxes, were not taking on board their

social responsibility, and were not spreading the benefits of growth and

wealth, and that is quite a tough message when you are talking about

people sitting there in front of you. And it matters, because she

needs those people to be on board for Brexit, bluntly because they

have in their hands thousands and thousands of jobs here in Britain,

they bring in billions of pounds of investment. These people matter, and

Theresa May needs them to be confident about Brexit. And she had

a fairly blunt message for them, which is you guys need to shake up

the way you operate. You can't carry on as before. Because this is what

she called cult of the individual and globalisation, people frankly

feel left behind it, it is weakening the bonds of communities. So it was

a fairly direct message to the international elite in front of her,

that they have got to change their ways. Thank you, Norman.

Almost one in 10 secondary schools are under-performing,

that's according to Government figures out in the last few minutes.

Statistics show that nearly 300 secondaries in England are falling

below a new Government target that measures pupils' progress

and achievement over eight GCSE subjects.

For the first time this year, schools have not been judged

on the proportion of pupils scoring at least five C grades at GCSE.

Instead, there is a new headline measure called "progress 8."

What exactly has changed? For many years, schools were judged on how

may people got five GCSEs, including Maths and English, at Grade A* to C.

Now, in England, there are two new measures: Progress eight and

Attainment eight. So what does this mean? Progress eight is how far a

child has progressed from the end of primary school to their GCSEs. It

shows whether a student has performed to expectation. And

Attainment eight is the results from a pupil's best eight GCSEs including

Maths and English So why is this happening now? It's argued that five

GCSEs was too narrow a measure to judge how well schools were doing.

So it's thought to be fairer to see a pupil's best achievement across a

broader spectrum of subjects. But not everybody is happy. Critics have

argued that the new system is too complicated for parents and children

to understand. Let's talk now to our education correspondent Gillian

Hargreaves. Before we talk more about the results just out, first of

all, is there much controversy over this system? Schools and head

teachers have long argued that a raw score of how well your pupils have

done in their GCSEs was not sophisticated enough, there is a

school and -- School in Stoke-on-Trent that was told that it

required improvement, it is not at the standard that the government

says it should be. This morning, on its website, it shows

that it's Progress eight score is+0.25 and that will show parents

that it is above average and the progress made from the age of 11 to

16 is above average, doing very well. That is the sort of example I

think of what we are now going to see, a more sophisticated tool. The

union state this is great but they say it should not be the only tool

with which parents judge a school, they need to look in the round at

the curriculum, whether it is the right place for their child. Might

be too soon for there to have been a wider evaluation for the new figures

to indicate whether there are many more schools like this, which have

shifted their place on the tables? 282 schools have not

met the minimum level. That is a lower number than last year, it

would be comparing apples and pears. Schools are getting better, but it

is a bit early yet to see which ones may have done well in the past and

are now plummeting. If you start with pupils who are getting good

attainment and then they get it, where does that get you? Schools, if

they have always had high colour calibre pupils in the past, what

they have not been doing is comparing themselves to other

schools with very able pupils. -- high calibre pupils. What progress

children make is being measured here, comparing children of similar

abilities across England. So, yes, if a school in the past has always

had very able pupils, it cannot rest on its laurels, because it will be

exposed by the new measure. Now we can speak with a month of four,

these kids will be affected by the new measures. -- mum of four. And

Alison Critchley, Chief Executive of RSA Academies which has seven

schools in the West Midland, who also has three daughters at

secondary school. You have the raft of schools and the authority, do you

know how Have any schools in your area

shifted position? Yes, as Gillian has described, addicted elite

schools that have served communities with people red children who have

come in struggling, the progress that the children make in those

schools is really recognised by this new measure, because it judges

progress made rather than purely results they get at the end. And

also, where schools are stretching the more able, that performance is

rewarded. It has definitely made a difference to where schools are

appearing on and acknowledging... Can you give us some specific

examples, has there been a dramatic shift? Yes, so, with one of our

schools, always around the average in terms of the proportion of

children getting five GCSEs at ATC grade, I have not checked on the

finalised version but it is now something like +0.4. Just above

average? -- A-C grade. If you were at +0.5 then it would mean that you

are getting one great above what you expect in four of your GCSEs, it is

about a grade in half of the GCSEs higher, it is a difficult message to

understand, that is the difficulty in explaining what zero point for

actually means. You have four children, do you understand it? I

have been given the low down by my eldest daughter, doing their GCSEs

this year, she will be in the first batch to do a harder exam, I kind of

understand where this is coming from and I understand the league table

ranking a little bit better than most parents. Yes, I think in a way

it is great, it allows better students to perform and show off

their academic capabilities. You have four... So you will be looking

at a new school for your child who is in year six, will this change the

way that you pick a school? To be honest, no, I look at the whole

thing, not just results, but the environment, the teachers, does it

look happy and school, and the curriculum itself. -- does the

school look happy. You think it is a good new system. Any potential

snags? Certainly an improvement on the five A-C measure because it

reflects progress, if you are trying to reduce everything a school does

down to one number, and rank them from top to bottom, there is no

measure that would show that. Making a decision about a school, you need

to visit. The other risk and potential downside about it is how

schools respond to the measure, awful lot of pressure on schools, on

heads, on governors, to get the best they can, and part of it is about

the GCSEs that children take. As well as having to do English and

maths, the children how to do three more subjects from the back

subjects, and so schools are being encouraged to put children in for

geography and sciences and modern foreign languages. -- eBacc. That

would suit lots of children, but for others, more vocational offers,

perhaps a better option, so look at the curriculum, so that you can get

them test Progress eight score. -- so you can get the best Progress

eight score. There is obviously a natural level of ability, how much

can that be affected, depending upon which school pupil goes to? It can

make a significant difference, the other risk of the measure, a lot of

schools are between +0.5 and -0.5 and there is a risk of over

interpreting what that might mean, it might be a set of subjects that

children have put in for, rather than the quality of the teaching.

You have a 14-year-old son at school doing GCSEs next year, have you had

a chance to check out where the school is now on the latest league

tables with this new criteria? Yes, I have, he's not taking the next

year, he has another few years before taking them, and so we have

at the talks, and we know exactly what is going on. How is the school

doing, has it changed its position on the league table? Not that I am

aware of, no. What you think about it, do you think it is a better

system? It is difficult to say. Less able, will not be able to take the

different levels because we have foundation levels, higher levels,

but soon, that is going to be taken away and all children will be doing

the same ability and the same tests. It is going to be harder for the

children that are struggling. What you think about that, will it make a

difference? Is potentially good, if schools respond by narrowing the

curriculum that they offer, I think the combination of the new measure

with the budget pressures that many schools are facing means they have

to look carefully at the range of options that they offer for 15 and

16-year-olds, if they only have a small group doing art, drama, a

vocational option, they may decide they are unable to offer that and

then children are pushed into a different set of options, which may

be less good for their ability. Less suitable. Thank you all very much.

If you want to check out how your school is doing, you can go on the

BBC news website and put in your postcode and the list of schools in

your area will come up. Let us know your thoughts.

Donald Trump is preparing to be sworn in as the 45th US president.

He has said he expects record crowds at his inauguration.

We will be hearing from a key member of his transition team,

the man tipped to be the new US ambassador to the EU,

Chilly start of the day across southern areas but not everywhere,

in Farnborough and Hampshire, -- in Hampshire, -6, now it is -3, in

Reading, -3 as well, and that is where we have some clear skies. Not

all of us have clear skies, this is quite a murky scene taken earlier in

Derbyshire, we have a weather front dangled across parts of the UK,

fairly weak but what it has been producing is a fair bit of cloud and

a little bit of drizzle and patchy rain. Looking to the north, clear

skies, -3, some sunshine. And also some sunshine across southern areas

and again, cold feel, but beautiful here, Fife. Through the morning,

hanging onto the sunshine, still cold at the moment, still some

little pockets of mist, particularly around Bristol, could be slow in

clearing, most of the mist and fog we have had has lifted, cloud

further north, into the afternoon, you can see in the south-west,

hanging onto the sunshine, we could import more cloud from the North Sea

through the afternoon, it will still be a beautiful day but a cold one,

six is the maximum in London. Moving north, damp note, fizzling through

the day, pushing further north, a lot of clout, in the north-east,

hanging onto the sunshine, a few showers at times. Cloudy start,

remaining cloudy, we could see some breaks in the hills, south Wales at

the moment, some sunshine, we should see some across West Wales,

generally, for Wales, cloudy picture. Through the evening and

overnight, it is going to be cold, some frost, some patchy mist and

fog, and the cloud breaking further north. Still broken across the

north-east, so it will be cold. For the rest of the UK, not anticipating

any problems with frost at all. Tomorrow, losing mist and fog,

sunshine across southern areas, extending into Wales. Still have a

weak front, still producing the odd spot of drizzle, or light rain, but

you can see how the cloud has eroded through the day. -- you can see how

the cloud has eroded. Tomorrow, a bit more of it across the northern

and western parts, and Northern Ireland, better chance tomorrow of

seeing more in the way of breaks. Temperature wise, coming down in the

north comic used to double figures, the king at eights and nines,

generally where we should be at this stage in January. -- coming down in

the North, used to double figures, looking at eights

Today's top story - many people are missing

after an avalanche buried a hotel used by skiers in central Italy.

There are believed to be up to 30 people, seven staff, and the rest

were guests on this hotel when the earthquake and then the avalanche

hit. We will bring you the latest from there in just a moment. Also,

Donald Trump comes President of the United States tomorrow. We speak to

the man tipped to be his ambassador to the EU about the challenges

ahead. And is there a dirty truth behind clean eating? Ahead of

tonight's BBC programme that questions the advice of healthy

eating gurus you tell us to eat clean and avoid processed food. We

meet the Cambridge scientist taking on the food fad advocates.

Let's catch up with all the news with Annita in the newsroom.

A series of powerful earthquakes hit and Treacher yesterday. The latest

we are seeing is from the head of Italy's civil protection department

praising the rescuers who he says struggled through the snow to reach

the hotel. Saying it was a very complicated operation reached by

courageous men who faced unbearable conditions.

Let's speak to Jiovanni Grezzi from the Agence

He's in the Amatrice region, about 50 kilometers from where

What is the latest you have on the fate of the people in the hotel? The

latest news we have other moment is that there should be a at least 20

dead, because people inside were trapped under the avalanche from

last night, and they have spent all night under snow, so everyone's via

is that there are at least 20 dead people. But somewhere I hearing have

been rescued from the hotel. There were two people who had gone outside

to their cars, so they were not stuck under the rubble from the

hotel, so one person, his family, children are trapped inside under

the avalanche. The situation is very difficult, we have one dead body,

but we fear the worst. Do people think that the earthquakes in the

region yesterday caused this avalanche? Of course, the reports

are that the earthquake, the earth moving, caused the avalanche,

because they were very strong here. It is not very far from the

epicentre of the earthquake, just out side Amatrice. Thank you very

much. Theresa May has told the World

Economic Forum that the UK will be open for business from Brexiteer

ready to embrace the world. It's her first visit

to Davos as Prime Minister. The Prime Minister also called

for businesses to do more to help those who feel "locked out and left

behind". It means Britain must go through a

tough negotiation and forge a new role for ourselves in the world. It

means accepting that the road ahead will be uncertain at times, but

believing that it leads towards a brighter future for our country's

children and grandchildren, too. Reports from Iran say a number of

firefighters have been killed after a fire caused a high building in the

capital Tehran to collapse. People are reported to be trapped under the

debris of the building which host a shopping centre. State TV showed the

moment when the building came down. There are reports of troops

from Senegal entering Gambia, as the political

crisis there escalates. The defeated President Yayha Jammeh

has ignored a midnight deadline to give way to the winner of last

month's election, Adama Barrow. West African military forces have

been preparing to move in to enforce 1,000 British holiday-makers have

returned home from Gambia with the Foreign Office advising

against all but essential And that's a summary of the news.

Thank you very much, Annita. Is the British press biased against

Muslims? One man believes that's the impression it gives, and has made it

his job to put it right. We have a special report on that. Now let's

catch up on the sport with you. A huge shock at the

Australian open this morning, defending champion

He was beaten in five sets by the wild card

and world number 117, Denis Istomin from Uzbekistan.

Istomin took the first set, but Djokovic won the next two.

It looked like it would have been a victory for him.

Istomin then took the fourth in a tiebreak to level

the match, going on to win the deciding set 6-4.

It took 4 hours and 48 minutes, but Istomin

And surely the biggest winner here is Andy Murray,

who's looking to win his first title in Melbourne.

His biggest challenger already out in the second round.

Joanna Konta eased to victory over naming Asarco, but bad news for

Heather Watson and Kyle Edmund, who went out. I looked to impose myself

on the match early, and I knew that if I was going to give her any

breathing room or any opportunity that she was just going to become

more and more dangerous, so I did try my best not to let that happen,

and after getting that break in the first set, I felt I did a good job

and also running with the momentum of it, and that also helped.

Liverpool, Southampton and Newcastle all through to the fourth round of

the FA Cup. Lucas Leiva scored the only goal the Liverpool, his first

for the club in seven years. They beat Plymouth Albion and will face

Wolves at Anfield in the next round. Two, three, four to zero would have

been OK. We just wanted to get the next round, no penalty shoot,

leaving Plymouth, as nice as it is here, as early as possible, because

the next game is waiting. All good. Manchester United have become the

richest club in football once again for the first time in 11 years. They

go ahead of European champions Real Madrid and the third richest club

Barcelona after record revenues of ?515 million last season. Eight

Premier League clubs are in the top 20 of the football money list,

including Premier League champions Leicester City for the first time.

England's Chris Woakes is taking three wickets as they made a great

start to the second one-day international against India. He took

the early wickets of Raul, Virat Kohli and da one. India were 25-3,

but Yuvraj Singh has helped steady things and is currently an 81, with

India 156-3 after 29 of their 50 overs as England try to level the

series. More sport later in the hour, Joanna. Thank you.

President-elect Donald Trump takes the oath of office tomorrow and it's

thought about 900,000 people are expected to gather in Washington

But his supporters are already on their way

as events kick off today - there will be a wreath laying

at Arlington National Cemetery to honour military veterans.

And also a concert later tonight - with both Donald Trump and his

Inauguration day tomorrow is full of tradition and ceremony

Let's talk now to Professor Ted Malloch -

a key adviser to Donald Trump during his election

and the man tipped to be his ambassador to the EU.

You have been talking to government advisers here at Downing Street.

Have you told them to read Donald Trump's book if you want under Stan

the Man? You must have had somebody in the room if you heard that! I

think it is the best way to understand Donald Trump, because he

is a transactional figure who really thinks in those terms. So explain a

bit more about what it is that they need to understand when they are

dealing with him? He views the world is a set of deals, as transactions,

and he positions himself. He is really a fantastic negotiator, so if

you are going to be across the table from him, or trying to bargain with

him, it is very helpful to know his mind on how he approaches a subject.

One of the lines of advice in the book is, the worst thing you could

possibly do in a deal is seen desperate to make it. That makes the

other guy smell blood and then you are dead. Was Theresa May's line

when she said about the EU/ UK deal, no deal is better than a bad one, is

that straight out of Donald Trump's playbook? Maybe she's reading it

already in preparation for the summit! I thought her speech was

brilliant, her finest hour, and it seems like she is saying the same

thing at Davos. How do you think she's playing her hand? I think she

is playing it very strong, and this kind of clean Brexit that is harder

than some people expected is very forceful. The possibility for

Britain to be a global Britain, which was suggested in her speech, I

think it is a brilliant strategy. It is the best card that Britain has to

play, and it's best partner will be the United States. So tell us more

about that, because the UK is not allowed to formally begin trade

negotiations until it has actually left the EU, which would be two

years after Article 50 is triggered, but you think there is a way around

that, and that potentially, you said a deal could be struck in 90 days

through informal discussions? I think that is possible. We're

talking about informal discussions, something that is off the record,

that is private, and the preparatory work is done, so to then have a

formal statement when the time allows it, this is the way diplomacy

works. Lawyers don't run the world. 90 days, some people are saying it

can take up to ten years for trade deals. How could you be so sure 90

days would do it? It has been suggested by some people close to

both sides that if it was really desired, and you put the right

people together, and you use some existing frameworks, you could have

a minimalist agreement within 90 days and build on it from there. The

largest mergers and acquisitions in the world take less than 90 days.

You have described Arnold Trump in the context of the negotiations

between the US and the UK on a deal is being a white knight coming to

help a damsel in distress. It is sounded like the United States is

looking very benignly on the UK right now. Why would that be? It

would be because the US/ UK special relationship is a part of our

history as it is a part of your history. I can tell you first hand

Winston Churchill would be going back into the Oval Office in the

form of his bust, and that solid relationship is important to the

global economy, it is important to the transatlantic alliance, and it

is also the case that Donald Trump has origins in the United Kingdom.

He is very well disposed towards a relationship with the

English-speaking people. We are talking about a man who is coming

into office vowing to make America great again, who as we said in his

book on business, he makes very clear that it is all about the art

of the deal. What is in it for America? It is sounding like it is

all about what is in Britain's best interests right now. What is the

wider context? Is there something to be said for if there are strong

messages going out to the UK that actually looking to other countries

for good trade deals out of the EU, that sends strong signals to other

countries in the EU right now. It does, and it is a message in the

sense that it speaks volumes to other countries, but I think it is

also the case in any negotiation, trade negotiation, there is a kind

of reciprocal agreement, so it is not like the US is going to offer

Britain a free deal. There will be a exchange. The US having access to

the British economy is significant, the passing of financial services

between the two markets is significant. The relationship on

defence issues has always been important, on intelligence. So I

think these things will be beefed up in this new era of the special

relationship. In the context of you being the frontrunner to be the new

EU Ambassador, that message coming from the United States shake things

up a bit, doesn't it? Imported European countries, the key members

of the European Union, going to elections, the message that they may

be better off outside the constraints of EU trade. These other

things that European countries themselves to decide. The United

States certainly did not pressure, quite the opposite, the British

people to vote for Brexit, if I recall President Obama was wrought

over to tell them to get an order in four remain. So the US under Donald

Trump will be a very different order, and in his interview with

Michael Gove in Bild magazine that was released suggested this in stark

terms. I keep saying you are the frontrunner to be the US ambassador

to the EU, I think all the existing ambassadors are out of post on

Friday. Would you expect to be told then, before, whether you are in or

out? These are political appointments,

and I think that, certainly in the coming weeks, all those

announcements will be made. And indeed, all the cabinet, as of this

morning, is in place. Donald Trump announces agriculture Secretary this

morning, and so now we will get onto the next of appointment. Let's talk

now to Benjamin Marchi and Tim Young - two Republican voters who are

heading to the inauguration celebrations later today.

On the eve of this inauguration, we are looking now to a president about

him a lot is known, about whom it is thought that things are known, and

much is feared, how do you see him? I don't think he's that feared, you

know, it is interesting because a lot of the media has spun it that he

is more feared... It is the coasts where the media is, media from Los

Angeles and New York are a little more worried about what is going to

do than people in the flyover states. Although they are not the

popular vote, they represent a majority of the country. How do you

feel about America's place in the world? I am ecstatic about our place

in the world right now, right now, for a change, I think Donald Trump

is going to give us a posture wholly different from the last eight years,

one which will be more respected and appreciated throughout the world. We

will not be drawing unintentional red lines. More divisive? It will

not be that divisive, there will be naysayers out there. There will be

naysayers who nit-pick and pull apart things that he says, art at

the end of the day, we are excited about him truly making America great

again and the team news putting together continues to give people

that I talk to on irregularly 's is a lot of confidence in his ability

to lead the free world. What do you think will happen, will he hit the

ground running? That is what I have been told from insiders as well,

complete 180, it is interesting, the symbolism, the term of the unknown

soldier is where the wreath will be laid, there is always a changing of

the guard, this is a significant changing of the guard, all the

policies, almost unanimously, all of his policies, Barack Obama's

policies, will be flipped with the new changing of the guard under

Donald Trump. You are both heading off to the celebrations today, ahead

of the inauguration tomorrow. the Finnish pop star Saara Aalto

who came second in The X Factor has already signed a record

deal with Sony. We will speak to Saara

in her first interview of 2017. We've forgiven the avocado

for its high fat content and deemed We're swapping full fat

lattes for sugar-free, and using gadgets to swirl

courgettes into a gluten-free But can the food we eat

really "clean" our bodies Cambridge University scientist

Dr Giles Yo In a moment, we'll talk to Dr Yo,

and also to the founder of a healthy food festival and a woman who says

she was so obsessed by clean eating But first, let's watch part

of Dr Yo's programme, where he goes on a journey

to America and sees the extreme side of the lifestyle

at a Californian ranch, where cancer patients are being

treated with alkaline food. VOICEOVER: Up ahead, the pH miracle

branch. -- ranch. A millionaire 's paradise, funded by alkaline eating.

He has a moat, he has a moat here. I don't see any alligators coming to

eat me, Robert?

Hello, yes. Hello, I'm Giles.

Dr Giles! Very pleased to meet you.

Is this where miracles happen, this is your miracle ranch?

I want to know how Robert thinks we can use food to stay well.

Are you familiar with the fishbowl metaphor?

OK, the fishbowl metaphor begs a question, and the question is,

if the fish is sick, what would you do?

Treat the fish or change the water? I'd change the water, right?

he means eat alkaline food to stop ourselves becoming acidic.

The human body, in its perfect state of health,

Robert invites me to share in his daily alkaline routine.

My brain needs to prepare... I'll join you.

Tastes like green tea. It tastes like cold green tea.

STUDIO: Social media has seen the clean eating

But it's not all good news, nutritionists have reported the rise

of a psychological condition known as orthorexia,

Dr Yeo cooks with one of Instagram's biggest health bloggers,

Deliciously Ella, who promotes a plant-based diet.

She's one of the most popular brands associated

and he examines how far her plant-based cooking

She tells him the idea of "clean" has lost its way.

The gurus of clean are doing nothing wrong in helping people eat more

healthily but with their growing influence comes a

responsibility to ground their promises improved. Now, one of the

most influential figures on the movement says it has lost its way.

My problem with the word clean is that it has become too complicated,

loaded, now bit implies dirty, that is negative, we should not have

that. I think it is sad to me that clean has been taken so far out of

how it was originally meant to be used by people, as far as I

understood it, it meant natural, unprocessed, now it doesn't mean

that, it means diet, it means fad. Let's talk more about it. Dr Giles

Yeo from the University of Cambridge went on this journey to investigate

clean eating. Rose Lloyd Owen runs a healthy eating food and yoga

festival featuring Deliciously Ella and many of the top clean-eating

bloggers. And also joining us, Kerry Armstrong, who says she was so

obsessed by clean eating that became dangerously ill and believed certain

food was 'unclean. Until I became physically unwell, I have never

thought anything about type, if you look at a search engine, how do you

get better, I began researching it, and I thought I had been poisoning

myself, I took it to Olympic standards, I went from eating any to

within 18 months weighing six stone, and only eating watermelon. I took

it as extreme as you can get it, my teeth were crumbling, hair falling

out, never left the house, completely fixated with the idea of

cleaning myself to get well again. This is a concept that you have

looked at for your programme... That is an extreme example, but having

looked closely at it, what is your assessment on whether food can make

you ill, can make you well? It depends, as with everything, it's

depends, for example, if we start with what I agree with, in terms of

when I look at the food, undoubtedly, we have a broken food

environment we need to fix, a lot of the diseases we have are not diet

related, we have got to fix obesity, we have got to fix the food

environment we are in, that is why I went on the journey. The problem is,

if you take what I think without control verse is a healthy diet, eat

more eat less meat, but then wrap it around pseudoscience to say that it

can suddenly cure you, it can cure you of cancer, any number of other

ailments, then I have a problem. The phrase that is being used now is

orthorexia, the of session with clean eating, how money people are

susceptible to it becoming a disorder? It is almost like a

variant of anorexia, orthorexia, where you have a controlled

psychosis in order to keep control of your life. -- control psychosis.

It is tied up in social media, the clean phenomenon, a lot of the food

gurus that are out there reach millions of followers, what happens

is, while the vast majority of those millions of followers will treat it

as it is, that looks like a pretty plate of food, I'm going to have

that, but you will have a percentage of human beings... Completely

randomly, what I did was I joined Instagram, for the show, I did this

and that, and I posted a picture of my breakfast, a sausage and egg and

muffin, and a cup of tea. I lost 10% of my followers in 24 hours, because

of the people who were following me. Couldn't bear to look at a sausage.

I was funny, I documented it, but imagine you are susceptible, imagine

that this is my life, I have worked hard for this plate of food but for

some reason, a percentage of people don't want it, and they are banned

in you, that is where the problem begins, those people feel bad. Rose,

you have said that you are a founder of a healthy eating festival, can

you believe that people cannot bear to look at a picture of a sausage?

That is a little crazy, we have a festival in a couple of weeks, and

the ethos we have there is to bring in all sorts of different eating,

all sorts of different ways of eating, and celebrate everybody,

everybody... Does it celebrate eating a sausage, eating a packet of

biscuits, if you feel like it, it is not something you should do all the

time, but... Absolutely... This is about extremes. Nobody is saying it

should be extreme, nobody is saying it should be all or nothing, but

this is where the problem is, none of these guys are saying, you must

do this, you should do this 100% of the time, very much advocate a

70/30, spaghetti is not going to kill you but how about making it out

of celeriac, courgette, because essentially, you are getting more

vegetables into your diet, and that is better for you. There will be

people who interpret that as, therefore, there is this lovely

healthy option which looks beautiful in Instagram, eating the pasta is

bad. And like anything, with anything, that becomes big, there

will be people who take it too literally and take the wrong message

and I think no one is giving that message out, simply trying to find

more interesting and delicious ways of cooking vegetables. You have

talked about how you initially started wanting to make yourself

feel better, and it went down a very extreme path, when you were... Tell

us about the images you were seeing... The messages that you were

taking on board from the environment around you. To be honest, pet, we

could go on all day about why it is social and media's full, or my

friend, what I am not taking responsibility, I forgot, plain and

simple, it is not what goes into my mouth that makes me worthwhile as a

person, it is what comes out of it. I elevated food to a place it does

not belong, it is not my salvation. I was spiritually bankrupt, I was

looking for mindfulness within my plate, you do not get spiritual

well-being from what you eat, it is how you live and contribute, and I

had walked that, taken that out of perspective. -- warped that. To make

myself well, I had to leave food alone, have it be in experience,

because foods does not love you back but people can. That is how I got

well. It has nothing to do with healthy eating. Food elevated to a

place it does not belong... It is a good phrase, how much you think that

is happening? Food keeps us alive, it ought to be elevated to... We put

it in us, it makes us who we are. I definitely agree that we should

respect the food that we eat but respecting the food that we eat, or

pasting something on there that does not actually do... That is where I

think issues begin to happen. One thing of what you said:

Saying that I can't blame other be bought for it, but the problem is

you are still living within a particular environment that foisted

that upon you. But that isn't me taking responsibility. I don't have

to react to that, and to keep myself safe from something like that, when

you know who you are, social media cannot do hate you, and you will not

get sick like this. I agree, I think eating disorders have existed for a

long time. And they are thinking disorders first and foremost. Yes,

unfortunately it is in your mind, what you are seeing may influence

your mind, but the problem is within you wait before you go on social

media. Can I just interrupted. When you say it is all in the mind, you

paste eating disorders into some form of weird mental condition. I

didn't mean that. But we are still trying to understand it, there is a

susceptibility, a genetic susceptibility. But that makes me

feel hopeless, but I am not, I am strong, I have done it. I have

studied obesity, and I know that there are people who are susceptible

to obesity, and equally there will be people who are susceptible to

accepting there is a biological, genetic input in part. I'm not

saying I'm giving up, but why am I well now, then? I'm sorry, let me

come in. It is a longer discussion. Your programme is on tonight, BBC

Two, 9pm. Thank you very much to all of you. Keep letting us know your

thoughts on that one. Still to come: Is the British press

out to get Muslims? - one man believes that's

the impression it gives - and has made it his job

to put it right. The Finnish pop star Saara Aalto

who came second in The X Factor has already signed a record

deal with Sony. We will speak to Saara

in her first interview of 2017 With the news here's Annita

in the BBC Newsroom. At least 20 people have reportedly

been killed after a hotel was hit by an avalanche in central

Italy. Up to 30 guests and staff

were in the Rigopiano Hotel on San Grasso mountain

in the Abruzzo region. The avalanche was triggered

by a series of powerful earthquakes Giovanni Groetzki from the news

agency is in the region about 50 kilometres from where the avalanche

struck. The latest news we have at the moment is that there should be

at least 20 dead, because people inside were trapped under the

avalanche from last night, they spent all night under snow, so we

fear, everyone's fear is that there are at least 20 dead people.

Theresa May has told the World Economic Forum that the UK

will be open for business after Brexit, and ready to 'embrace

the world.' It's her first visit to Davos as Prime Minister -

she also called for businesses to do more to help those who feel "locked

Reports from Iran say a number of firefighters have been killed,

after a fire caused a high-storey building in the capital

Dozens more people are reported to be trapped under the debris

of the 17-storey Plasco building, which hosts a shopping centre.

State TV showed the moment when the building came down.

The leading contender to be the new US ambassador to the EU says that

Donald Trump 's presidency will spark a new era of US UK relations.

He said a trader could be negotiated in as little as 90 days and said

Donald Trump looked favourably on the UK. I think the US/ UK special

relationship is a part of our history as it is a part of your

history. I can tell you first hand Winston Churchill will be going back

into the Oval Office in the form of his bust, and that solid

relationship is important to the global economy, it is important to

the transatlantic alliance, and it is also the case that Donald Trump

has origins in the United Kingdom. He is very well disposed towards a

relationship of the English-speaking people. That is a summary of the

latest news. Do join me for BBC newsroom live at 11 o'clock.

I have to just read quick to have seen. Gabriella Simmon-Bird just

heard that Sarr alto will be an the show, and I got so excited, I

started clapping. Let's get some support with you. No round of

applause from the! Novak Djokovic has gone out of the Australian open.

The defending champion beaten in five sets by the wild card world

number 117 Denis Istomin in a match that lasted nearly five hours. The

British number one Johanna Konta is the third round, beating Naomi

Asarco, and she faces Caroline Wozniacki next, Heather Watson and

Kyle Edmund are both out. Liverpool beat Plymouth Argyle, Lucas Leiva

with their only goal of the game. Southampton and Newcastle also went

through. Manchester United have returned to the top of football's

money list for the first time since 2004, overtaking Real Madrid who

have held the top spot for the last 11 years. And Yuvraj Singh has made

a century of India to frustrate England's bowlers. They are 208-3,

England hoping to level the series. We will be back more after 11

o'clock. Are large sections of the British

press biased against Muslims? Last month there were nine

corrections to articles concerning Muslims in the British

media - this month The activist behind most of these

complaints and corrections says inaccurate media reporting

about Muslims has led But critics argue there

is an attempt to prevent The most high-profile apology last

month was given to a Muslim family falsely accused of being extremists

by columnist Katie Hopkins Zahid Mahmood last month received

very public apology. Daily Mail columnist

Katie Hopkins had suggested that he and his brother

were extremists with links to Al-Qaeda, after US authorities

refused to let them and their family On December 19th, the paper

and Hopkins were forced to apologise and pay ?150,000 in damages

to the family. Type my name, teach my kids,

look, you will never see me on any of this,

it wouldn't come up. How did it then feel to have that

article written about you? It's cutting wounds and putting

salt on it, you know? We haven't overcome the emotional

trauma that we went through, with the kids, in front

of their eyes, and then two days later being accused

on the national media - it was worldwide media, not just

in the UK, it was worldwide. The apology to Zahid and his family

came alongside eight other corrections to articles

concerning Muslims last month. This is far higher than previous

months, and is partly down Miqdaad Versi is an activist

and also Assistant Secretary General He has taken it upon himself

to start systematically monitoring stories concerning Muslims,

and has so far put in more than 50 complaints to newspapers

and to Ipso, the press regulator. Not all succeed, but he was behind

eight corrections last month. How much of a problem

are these inaccuracies? Nowadays, things just spread

virally on social media, and that's what the problem really

is, that these individual stories get traction,

and far right websites, extremist websites, take it up,

and that's the problem. Then when there is a correction,

that doesn't go as far, it doesn't go to those far right

websites, so the individuals who saw it in the first place have this view

that this is reality. Five of the corrections

in December related to The Sunday Times article

stated in its headline, "Enclaves of Islam see UK as 75%

Muslim." And it's about a report

by Louise Casey on integration In reality, what the report actually

said was one school had students who thought that the majority

of the country were Asian. And it was to do with one

school only, rather So this was entirely incorrect,

which the Sunday Times acknowledged, Also last month, the Daily Mail had

to correct an article The correction read,

"A headline on an earlier version of this article said that

Malia Bouattia claimed that young Muslims are travelling to join Isis

in Syria due to cuts to education. It also said that Miss Bouattia had

refused to condemn Isis. The correct position is that

Miss Bouattia claimed that young Muslims are travelling to join Isis

in Syria for reasons including Government cuts to education

and mass unemployment, and Miss Bouattia

has condemned Isis." This one is The Sun On Sunday mixing

up two black Muslims, one who is fighting against extremism

and one who's accused of extremism. And this one is by ITN News,

where they seem to misinterpret a poll, claiming that half of UK

Muslims would not report extremism, So previously we had individuals

taking on the press where they felt they had been misreported,

but now you are taking on any story that you think's inaccurate

about Muslims or Islam, That's right, so because nobody else

seems to be doing this, there've been so many articles

about Muslims overall that have been entirely inaccurate,

and they create this idea within many Muslim communities that

media's out to get them. And the reason that's the case

is that nobody's challenging these newspapers and saying,

"That's not true." The Muslim Council of Britain has

been unequivocal on this, it's raised this issue again

and again that inaccurate reporting leads to hostility against Muslims,

and that's a problem not just for Muslim communities

but for the wider society. The Independent Press

Standards Organisation, Ipso, confirmed that it is receiving

lots of complaints It also pointed out that the two

articles about which it's had the most complaints

since it was formed in 2014 I think I, like anyone else, want

a press that's going to be accurate, that's going to care about the facts

and verifying them, but I think this campaign

of complaints that we've seen, particularly over the last six

months, it looks like, I don't think that's really

what's driving it. I think what we're seeing

here is a quite concerted attempt to often ringfence Islam

from criticism and to try and chill discussion about a lot of issues,

and I think for me the standout case of this was a story that was run

by both The Sun and the Mail Online in May last year, a suspected honour

killing, so both papers ran with this, they referred to it

as an Islamic honour killing, And so a complaint was made

which stated that Islam doesn't condone honour killings,

that this is a cultural thing, not a religious thing,

and as a result of this, Ipso ruled and required

the newspapers to print, and this is almost a direct quote,

that the religion of Islam does not I thought that was just

absolutely staggering, because, as we all know,

a religion is just an assortment of ideas and principles,

these things are contested. What these papers were effectively

asked to do, and what they did, was to print one accepted

interpretation of religion, and to me this was just

like back-door blasphemy law. Do you worry about a chilling

effect, that your constant critique will make people scared

of covering these issues? Not really, because in reality

newspapers report on a range All I'm asking for is

responsible reporting. For Zahid, this is not just

about incorrect reporting, though. He feels the response to both

the original article by Katie Hopkins and her apology

was very reactionary. First, they were all against us,

when Katie Hopkins published the article, and then when she made

an apology a year later, then they all turned against her,

so there's no middle ground. The upsetting part is not the actual

element of Katie Hopkins, it's the mindset of people,

how they can very easily be led against somebody

or in favour of somebody. I feel proud to be living

in London as a Muslim. Where people from different

backgrounds, different countries, different tribes, different

languages, faith, beliefs, But there are elements

which are actually destroying these relationships and this unity

which we have within the community. How do you feel about

Katie Hopkins now? In fact, my wife and I would

formally like to invite her to our In fact, my wife and I would

formally like to invite her to our We have no grudge against her,

and we would like her to learn and know that we are as British

as she is. In fact, my wife's grandfather

and great-grandfather both fought They fought for the very

freedom of this country. Many people wouldn't

be so forgiving. This is what I've been brought up

with, this is the teaching of the Prophet Muhammad,

peace be upon him, that he has taught us

to remove evil with goodness. She made allegations,

we want to show her the goodness, and we want to invite her to our

house so she can first-hand meet us. STUDIO: Last month, the Daily Mail

and columnist Katie Hopkins apologised to Zahid Mahmood

after suggesting he and his who is behind these complaints

regarding inaccurate media And Tom Slater, who is

Deputy Editor of Spiked Online As you saw there in the film,

Zahid Mahmood who received an apology from Katie Hopkins

after she labelled him an extremist We got in touch with Katie

and put this offer to her what impact do you think this is

having? It is not just me saying this, this is academise from

Leicester University, Cambridge University, European Commission on

racism and intolerance, all are saying the same thing, reckless

reporting leads to hate crime, leads to hostility against Muslims. This

is not just me saying it, this is nationally, academics,

internationally, human rights activist, those who are looking at

this issue at the United Nations level, specifically talking about

how media has caused hostility against Muslims in the UK. Do you

think newspapers and journalists have to be more wary of what is

being said in that context, if there is a link between what is said in

the papers and what is happening in the community? First and foremost, I

am dubious of the link that is set between reporting and people's

reactions, that projects a quite low view of the public, that they can be

whipped into a frenzy by a you force headlines but we all want a press

that is going to be factual and care about accuracy but I do not believe

that is what is driving this, I think the mail online, the example

referred to in the film, perfect example, newspapers effectively

required to print what is according to him, the acceptable version of a

particular religion, that is like something out of the days of the

Star chamber, I cannot believe it so is going along with this, unless you

have a direct line, there is no requirement to print these things.

-- Ipso. Did you read the tips are ruling? It did not say that. It

didn't say that, -- did you read the Ipso ruling? That is what the ruling

was, the fact that the mail online chose to respond and they decided to

explain the reasoning, and apologise in the way they did, that is a

choice for the Mail Online, they did not ask them to make a theological

decision. That means ask you a question, when there are statements,

like the Sun saying, supermarket terror, gunmen... Here we go...

Gunmen screaming opens fire in Spanish supermarket while carrying

bag filled with petrol and gunpowder... Similar stories in the

Daily Mail and the express. The reality is, these are factually

incorrect, you can tell they are not factually correct because the sun

decided to make changes, changing the article entire it, it is of the

reality, it just wasn't true. -- changing the article entirely.

Stories across-the-board are found to be inaccurate, are you saying

that stories that relates to Islam needs to be monitored more

carefully? I'm not talking about favours, I'm talking about fairness.

We have a situation right now where people have a low view of the press,

I believe in journalism and the fact that we want to have a strong press

out there, we will seek a challenge authority, but when there is

inaccuracy is, that undermines really good reporting. Forge gnarly,

we have seen examples. You have said that it is OK for editors to keep

this... -- unfortunately, we have seen examples. These newspapers did

print corrections under their own polishing, but it is under pressure,

the sun and the mail Online printed the same sentence, that tells us

what is going on in this instance, we should all care about

corrections, some of the corrections we are talking about, these

newspapers repeated this misreading, this misrepresentation of a

particular statistic, but you'd suggest this is spreading hate, and

I disagree with that for two reasons: look at the Sunday Times

retraction, they made the point that this story was published before the

story came review came out, that is a product of churn-alism, which is a

big problem, and it encourages a climate which sees issues which

affect Muslims as something as touchy, and the reason that

something like the Casey Report exploded as it did, as most

egalitarian would have, there is a feeling that integration is not

going as well as we would like all stop we should be allowed to talk

about that. Looking closely at any story, and saying, where there are

factual inaccuracies, they need to be corrected. I think there is

definitely a moral obligation on newspapers to correct things but

what we're looking at here is something much broader, I see this

as a much broader context, not just about is fellow here, it is a

broader climate, this hyper session with Islamophobia, it is a chilling

discussion, what has been done quite successfully is to conflate

criticism of Islam, discussion of issues that affect the Muslim

community, with criticism of those as individuals, they have racialised

discussion and that is inimical to free speech. There has been 25

corrections in the last year, 13 in the last six weeks, every week there

has been two corrections on average on issues related to Muslims, let's

listen to the academics who say that this is a problem, who say this is

causing hate rhyme. Rather than listen to opinions by individuals,

listen to academics, facts, hopefully we can have a stronger

press, so we can have responsible reporting for all. Thank you both

very much. It was only last month that Finnish

pop star Saara Aalto came but the 29-year-old has already

signed a record deal with Sony. She entered the show after years