Episode 9 The Big Questions


Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS


Episode 9

Nicky Campbell presents topical debate from Lliswerry High School, Newport. Should Britain be proud of its arms trade? Plus is obesity a matter of personal responsibility?


Similar Content

Browse content similar to Episode 9. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

Today on The Big Questions...

0:00:010:00:04

The arms industry - a matter

of pride or a matter

0:00:040:00:06

of shame for Britain?

0:00:060:00:10

And obesity - whose fault

is it if you're too fat?

0:00:100:00:17

APPLAUSE

0:00:220:00:26

Good morning, I'm Nicky Campbell.

0:00:260:00:27

Welcome to The Big Questions.

0:00:270:00:29

Today we're live from

Lliswerry High School

0:00:290:00:31

in Newport, South Wales.

0:00:310:00:32

Welcome, everybody,

to The Big Questions.

0:00:320:00:35

APPLAUSE

0:00:350:00:41

Britain is very good

at making weapons, armoured

0:00:410:00:43

vehicles, fighter planes,

bombs and ammunition.

0:00:430:00:47

So good that we're the second

biggest arms dealer in the world,

0:00:470:00:50

outgunned only by the USA.

0:00:500:00:56

This week, there's been a very

important customer in town -

0:00:560:00:58

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman

of Saudi Arabia.

0:00:580:01:00

Lunch with the Queen,

dinner with the Prince

0:01:000:01:03

of Wales and Prince William,

and a meeting with the Prime

0:01:030:01:05

Minister at Chequers have all been

aimed at getting him to sign a deal

0:01:050:01:09

to buy 48 Typhoon jet fighters,

amongst other things.

0:01:090:01:15

The deal is good news for the 5,000

BAE Systems employees

0:01:150:01:17

in Lancashire that assemble them.

0:01:170:01:19

But protesters against

the Saudi Prince were more concerned

0:01:190:01:21

at the Saudi-led bombardment

and blockade of Yemen and its

0:01:210:01:23

ensuing humanitarian disaster.

0:01:230:01:25

Should Britain be proud

of its arms trade?

0:01:250:01:33

Brad, is the arms trade immoral?

I

think arms in themselves are immoral

0:01:350:01:40

and the question we talk about,

pride in what? One of the things the

0:01:400:01:46

arms trade will always do this if

you start to critique it, they will

0:01:460:01:51

immediately say you are bringing

into question the pride of the

0:01:510:01:53

worker, nobody I know who critiques

the arms trade wants to bring into

0:01:530:01:59

question the integrity of the

workers. They can only produce arms,

0:01:590:02:05

I do not think that. What we have to

bring into question is that arms and

0:02:050:02:10

the consequences. Whenever we think

about guns in America, start with

0:02:100:02:14

the shootings at schools, the same

with the arms trade. These weapons

0:02:140:02:18

are designed to kill.

We need an

army and the Army needs to be

0:02:180:02:22

killed.

Do we need an army? We start

this understanding of politics which

0:02:220:02:27

big guns -- which begins with the

fact that humans are naturally

0:02:270:02:35

violent, we know in the

20th-century, we know that... Can we

0:02:350:02:46

not think of a different type of

politics? I think human beings...

0:02:460:02:48

APPLAUSE

Philip Dunne, lots to get our teeth

0:02:480:02:54

into, let me ask you about Saudi

Arabia, why are we sucking up to a

0:02:540:02:58

regime which has caused thousands of

deaths in the Yemen, it flogs

0:02:580:03:06

atheist bloggers, stages public

beheadings, kills homosexuals,

0:03:060:03:09

spreads extremism across the

world...

I will answer that in the

0:03:090:03:16

second. I must pick up Brad's

comments...

Do the Saudi Arabia

0:03:160:03:24

point first.

Should we haven't

military? -- should we have a

0:03:240:03:30

military?

Saudi Arabia first.

2007,

the crown princes at it, to

0:03:300:03:37

encourage him in the work he is

doing in modernising his nation, the

0:03:370:03:44

first leader of that most important

country in the Gulf, a key UK ally

0:03:440:03:47

in trying to get to grips with

decades of internal repression and

0:03:470:03:54

corruption and trying to introduce

moderate Islam, rather than the

0:03:540:03:57

extreme version they have been

having, trying to modernise the

0:03:570:04:01

economy, he has tried to do a lot of

good stuff very quickly. It is

0:04:010:04:07

absolutely right we should welcome

him to this country, to try to

0:04:070:04:12

encourage him in what he is doing,

and the package you referred to

0:04:120:04:15

about the defence potential, it was

a small element of a much bigger

0:04:150:04:21

programme of economic cooperation.

It is not a small element of the

0:04:210:04:25

people in Yemen suffering, being

killed by the Saudi bombing. It is

0:04:250:04:29

really about whitewashing the Saudi

war crimes and unfortunately that is

0:04:290:04:33

what we see in the UK's relationship

with Saudi Arabia, it is based

0:04:330:04:38

largely around the arms trade and we

know what the arms are being used

0:04:380:04:42

for, for war crimes, for attacks on

civilians, attacks on

0:04:420:04:48

infrastructure. As long as the UK is

selling weapons to Saudi Arabia, we

0:04:480:04:52

are complicit in the violence and we

have to put an end to it.

The Army

0:04:520:04:58

point. We need to have an army.

I do

not think that is the question at

0:04:580:05:05

hand, actually.

We have plenty of

time, I would like to address that,

0:05:050:05:10

Brad said we do not necessarily need

one.

In an ideal world, no one wants

0:05:100:05:14

to see a world with the conflict we

have right now and we should keep

0:05:140:05:18

our eye on that aim. In the

meantime, there are specific things

0:05:180:05:22

we can do to reduce and to stop some

of the worst humanitarian crises,

0:05:220:05:29

some of the worst crimes happening

in this world, and that arms trade

0:05:290:05:33

is fuelling war and conflict around

the world and the UK is playing a

0:05:330:05:37

central role in that so the first

thing we should be doing is ending

0:05:370:05:40

the arms trade to countries like

Saudi Arabia, many other countries,

0:05:400:05:45

committing war crimes, we know what

the arms are being used for, we

0:05:450:05:48

cannot let them go in that way.

I am

sure we will come onto this, but the

0:05:480:05:53

court threw out the allegation that

there was clear evidence of

0:05:530:05:57

humanitarian...

It is clear.

It was

thrown out by the court. The

0:05:570:06:05

question web Brad started us off,

why do we have an army? We have an

0:06:050:06:10

army to defend the country from

threat and the threats are multiple

0:06:100:06:16

and growing, staked on state

threats, we thought following the

0:06:160:06:18

cold war much of that was behind us,

it is evident we cannot, and we are

0:06:180:06:23

seeing now threats coming daily,

every minute, threats coming across

0:06:230:06:30

the internet affecting all of our

lives potentially, and much of those

0:06:300:06:34

threats are dealt with with military

capability.

Attacks on civilians in

0:06:340:06:38

Yemen and other places, for our

security, that is preposterous.

The

0:06:380:06:48

attack in Salisbury last weekend,

British military scientists who

0:06:480:06:52

developed the diagnostic tests which

helped stamp out the Ebola virus...

0:06:520:06:58

And also in the 50s, developed nerve

agents as well.

Getting back to the

0:06:580:07:03

topic of defence exports and

capability, defence industry

0:07:030:07:07

supports the military in this

country and the innovation and are

0:07:070:07:12

indeed that comes with that, from

space, which helped to generate our

0:07:120:07:19

GPS, huge civilian crossover which

would not exist -- R&D.

The idea

0:07:190:07:28

that an army existed defend a nation

is an art model. It is international

0:07:280:07:34

peacekeeping, so called humanitarian

and peacekeeping, in terms of the

0:07:340:07:44

arms trade...

They cannot do it with

chocolate is. There is a fundamental

0:07:440:07:48

contradiction.

On the one hand

saying we need to go to Iraq and

0:07:480:07:54

liberate them, and then they will

sell arms to regime is going

0:07:540:07:57

precisely against the democratic

movement of the Arab Spring.

We end

0:07:570:08:02

up with Isis.

There is a fundamental

conflict. The fundamental question,

0:08:020:08:07

you are right, the question about

the Army is an existential question,

0:08:070:08:11

it is a fundamental aim which we

should all try to achieve because

0:08:110:08:15

rather than saying, let us

monopolise violence, let us put

0:08:150:08:19

violence itself constantly on trial,

but the arms trade is the starting

0:08:190:08:23

point, what does it mean to

demilitarise the world?

James

0:08:230:08:29

McLaren.

It is to establish the

aspect of the world order to

0:08:290:08:39

establish and maintain armies and

Armed Forces, it will happen, and

0:08:450:08:47

while you have that, you will have

an arms trade.

The challenge is to

0:08:470:08:50

make sure it is properly regulated,

controlled unchallenged. Is it,

0:08:500:08:52

James?

If you're going to ask about

this country, my view is, yes,

0:08:520:08:55

but... The reason I say that, in

2002, the then Labour government

0:08:550:09:00

introduced the export controls that,

the first time legislation around

0:09:000:09:04

arms sales had been reintroduced

since 1931, a stepping stone. Since

0:09:040:09:08

then, we have got much better in

this country with a cross

0:09:080:09:13

participation of government

departments to make sure our exports

0:09:130:09:16

are undertaken legitimately and

appropriately.

Still arming Saudi

0:09:160:09:21

Arabia, Egypt...

16,000 export

licences go unchallenged every year.

0:09:210:09:30

No one is challenging us about

selling operational patrol boats.

0:09:300:09:38

The. We will come back to what is

admittedly a very debatable area of

0:09:380:09:44

arms exports, to Saudi Arabia, but

at the strategic level, arms sales

0:09:440:09:49

will take place.

It about the

regulations.

Andrew Smith. UK

0:09:490:09:54

fighter jets are right now dropping

bombs over Yemen. If the UK

0:09:540:10:03

Government, it has been totally

complicit in it. This week we have

0:10:030:10:07

seen how low the Government is

prepared to sink to sell weapons to

0:10:070:10:11

a dictatorship.

If you did not have

those bombs, you would have Russian

0:10:110:10:16

analogue unguided cluster munitions

doing it. You would not have

0:10:160:10:23

oversight in the Saudi chain of

command of what actually is going

0:10:230:10:26

on.

This is where there is a rank

hypocrisy at the heart of the

0:10:260:10:30

foreign policy based on talking

about imports of human rights and

0:10:300:10:34

democracy while also arming and

supporting brutal regime is. Even

0:10:340:10:38

mentioning Russia, for example, the

UK was exporting weapons to Russia

0:10:380:10:44

until 2014, and we are exporting to

China as we speak, all around the

0:10:440:10:48

world, to regime is we would all

agree have inflicted terrible brutal

0:10:480:10:51

assaults on human rights...

You

represent a lot of people working in

0:10:510:10:59

the arms industry as well, are they

conflicted when they realise where

0:10:590:11:02

the end product, the end

destination, if you like, of their

0:11:020:11:09

labours are going?

They care about

the end destination, but the choices

0:11:090:11:12

in terms of the use of the arms for

politicians the regime 's that

0:11:120:11:17

actually have them. We as a union

take the view that military

0:11:170:11:22

deployment is the responsibility of

politicians and the government, but

0:11:220:11:26

once the Armed Forces are deployed

on civilians and support, they are

0:11:260:11:30

entitled to the best resources to

support them. There has been an

0:11:300:11:34

interesting iteration of the debate

already, the arms trade, but we are

0:11:340:11:39

rapidly talking about manufacture of

arms in any form, at all. I think

0:11:390:11:44

whilst people can have deep concerns

about the use of arms

0:11:440:11:48

internationally exported, the idea

that people do not want us to

0:11:480:11:52

manufacture arms to at least defend

national interests, but as a whole

0:11:520:11:55

other debate. Critically, we are

talking about hundreds of thousands

0:11:550:11:59

of jobs here and I have no qualms

about pointing that out. These are

0:11:590:12:04

jobs that are vital to

communities...

High quality.

One of

0:12:040:12:09

the things that I think Brad touches

on, not a single product for defence

0:12:090:12:17

workers, it needs to be calm and

evidence -based, the debate, because

0:12:170:12:22

history tells us defence

diversification is not particularly

0:12:220:12:25

successful. We talk about it but the

case studies do not show much in the

0:12:250:12:30

way of success. Defence

diversification would be happening

0:12:300:12:32

at a time when more than one part of

our economy is looking at the

0:12:320:12:36

question of transition, a lot of

members in energy, often an adjacent

0:12:360:12:40

sector to defence, changes from

large power stations to renewable...

0:12:400:12:47

A whole chain of industry is

involved and there is a simple limit

0:12:470:12:51

to the extent to which we can

diversify quickly.

What would these

0:12:510:13:00

people do, Ryvka Barnard?

It is a

really important question and what

0:13:000:13:03

we need is decision-makers to be

putting attention to that question

0:13:030:13:07

very specifically.

What is the

answer?

Everyone should have access

0:13:070:13:11

to good jobs providing good

livelihoods and it is a question of

0:13:110:13:15

political will, we need to be

forward-looking and visionary.

Where

0:13:150:13:18

would you put that expertise?

We

need to look at what is the

0:13:180:13:23

investment in industry that could

create and sustain thousands and

0:13:230:13:26

thousands of jobs?

What might it be?

Not leading to the destruction and

0:13:260:13:31

death that the arms trade is.

Renewable energy is one. It is a

0:13:310:13:37

question of political will, not

necessarily a question of

0:13:370:13:39

feasibility and we need more studies

and careful attention to this.

0:13:390:13:45

Renewables is the source of jobs

which is quoted by every group

0:13:450:13:49

interested in diversification. We

will have to create a lot of

0:13:490:13:53

renewables jobs to soak up the

displaced jobs.

It is a very urgent

0:13:530:13:56

issue in our world.

We hear about

the industrial military complex,

0:13:560:14:03

real relationships between

politicians and arms manufacturers,

0:14:030:14:06

when you were ministers for defence

procurement, I'm sure you had a lot

0:14:060:14:11

of meetings with arms manufacturers?

We have a very significant industry

0:14:110:14:15

in this country, as Mike says,

employing many people.

People are

0:14:150:14:22

worried about those relationships.

Many are providing and doing

0:14:220:14:27

multiple things. They did at the

moment for GKN, a major motor

0:14:270:14:35

component manufacturer, and also in

aerospace and defence. Much of the

0:14:350:14:39

key issue is innovation that comes

out of investing primarily initially

0:14:390:14:45

for military purposes and carrying

over which would not happen if we

0:14:450:14:48

did not have a defence purpose.

Hands up, a word on the

0:14:480:14:53

relationships and what people worry

about, a symbiotic relationship

0:14:530:14:57

between the politicians and the arms

industry, is that a genuine concern?

0:14:570:15:02

The arms industry is a very small

part of the economy, export jobs

0:15:020:15:07

account for 0.2% of jobs in the

country, a very loud voice and

0:15:070:15:12

power. It does employ extremely

skilled people and we want the

0:15:120:15:16

skills put into more positive areas

of engineering to have a more

0:15:160:15:20

positive impact, not an industry

which leads to war and conflict.

0:15:200:15:28

Such us, renewables?

Renewables

would be one area, we need to look

0:15:280:15:31

at other areas, what can the

Government do to grow the areas? The

0:15:310:15:36

arms trade as a huge amount of

political support and logistical

0:15:360:15:39

support from Whitehall and the

emphasis needs to be put elsewhere.

0:15:390:15:43

Is there a genuine concern between

the relationship between politicians

0:15:430:15:48

and the arms industry or is Philip

Dunne right, are they necessary?

0:15:480:15:54

There has to be a real concern. The

Royal family has been seeing to be

0:15:540:16:04

involved in arms promotion.

We have

become embedded and people listen to

0:16:040:16:12

it.

With the war in Yemen, where is

the diplomatic way to start that?

We

0:16:120:16:21

can talk about the war in Yemen if

you like.

Let's talk about the

0:16:210:16:30

influence we can wield in those

situations, bringing Saudi Arabia on

0:16:300:16:34

that progressive past. Some people

argue that... I will come to you in

0:16:340:16:40

a minute. Who is proud of our arms

industry in the audience? That's

0:16:400:16:45

come to you if you are. He was

ashamed of our arms industry?

You

0:16:450:16:50

are proud of it. At the end of the

day, it is fair. 142,000 people are

0:16:500:16:56

employed in it. It is beneficial to

the country in general.

A lot of

0:16:560:17:01

jobs. Anyone else want to say

anything?

Morning. Nobody here would

0:17:010:17:09

want, given the choice, nobody here

would want to arm any nation. It

0:17:090:17:14

would be fantastic if we didn't have

a need for arms. As we do, like the

0:17:140:17:19

gentleman in front of me mentioned,

we have to live in the world as it

0:17:190:17:24

is and be pragmatic about things.

There are certain areas that take us

0:17:240:17:33

to Amman where they are repressing

freedom of association and that is

0:17:330:17:38

not a good idea.

We should

scrutinise what we sell. To buy the

0:17:380:17:42

argument that if we were not selling

arms to these people than the would?

0:17:420:17:48

We have to live in the real world

and look after our own interests.

0:17:480:17:55

Our own strategic interests. It is

kind of a soft power, isn't it?

The

0:17:550:18:00

term, security, and the phrase

strategic interests get used to

0:18:000:18:04

cover up what really is politicians

and arms dealers getting together

0:18:040:18:08

and making a profit actually. Where

is the strategic interest for war

0:18:080:18:13

crimes in Yemen for the killing of

civilians, thousands of civilians,

0:18:130:18:17

many of whom are children? How does

that meet any strategic interest of

0:18:170:18:21

the UK?

One of the operational tasks

of the British navy which has been

0:18:210:18:29

in place for the last 15 years or

so, has been to keep through our

0:18:290:18:34

minesweeping vessels the channels

between the Gulf and outside the

0:18:340:18:37

golf open from harassment from

Iranians attempts to block those

0:18:370:18:45

channels. That provides the vast

majority of our gas resource, which

0:18:450:18:50

comes out of the Gulf and oil into

this country and other countries

0:18:500:18:57

around the world. That activity is

being provided by the British

0:18:570:19:01

military in conjunction with our

allies and in particular your

0:19:010:19:06

countrymen in the US. If we weren't

doing that, there would be a serious

0:19:060:19:10

risk of disruption of supplies to

the energy of this country. How many

0:19:100:19:17

lives? No lives have been lost

through that.

What do you mean, what

0:19:170:19:21

is the cost?

There is a cost of war

and a cost of conflict.

It is not

0:19:210:19:28

conflict, it is preventing conflict.

People are being killed in Yemen or

0:19:280:19:33

other places.

0:19:330:19:40

other places.

We are missing how the

real world works. That is how the

0:19:400:19:44

real world works. The war in Yemen

is a legitimate war. It is not being

0:19:440:19:50

prosecuted as it should be but you

are not helping the people of Yemen

0:19:500:19:54

who are suffering so much if you

remove what are highly capable

0:19:540:19:58

munitions with people who are able

to use them and advise on them with

0:19:580:20:03

the unguided, horrible weapons we

are seeing used in Syria if you want

0:20:030:20:07

to replace British munitions with

Russian barrel bombs or Syrian

0:20:070:20:12

barrel bombs that will not help the

Yemen people.

There is something the

0:20:120:20:17

arms trade does in terms of the

Logic applied to this industry and

0:20:170:20:21

nothing else. Our refill of Columbia

started to say, we are proud of our

0:20:210:20:27

cocaine industry? We know it kills

people. We can regulate it better

0:20:270:20:31

but another nation will produce

cocaine so we might as well produce

0:20:310:20:35

it. If we apply the logic that, why

do we apply this logic. In that

0:20:350:20:45

kills people? This is the logic we

need to be happening.

What about the

0:20:450:20:51

cocaine analogy?

The Constitution of

Armed Forces bears no relationship

0:20:510:20:56

whatsoever to the cocaine industry.

That is another rabbit hole

0:20:560:20:59

compensation.

People in Yemen are

injuring one of the worst

0:20:590:21:05

humanitarian crises in the world. In

2017 50,000 children died of

0:21:050:21:10

preventable causes. We have seen 1

million people being affected with

0:21:100:21:14

cholera in Yemen following a

breakdown of health infrastructure

0:21:140:21:18

up and down the country. This does

not suggest the Saudi intervention

0:21:180:21:21

is doing any that things were ever

told it would. It suggests Saudi

0:21:210:21:25

forces are not being moderated by UK

influence. What about Iran? They are

0:21:250:21:31

playing a negative role in the

region full is we do not support

0:21:310:21:35

selling weapons to Iran. We do not

support selling arms to Iran, nor

0:21:350:21:41

selling more arms into a region

which Reddy has quite enough arms

0:21:410:21:44

and quite enough conflict.

Is the

international response to Yemen

0:21:440:21:50

good? No, it is not. Would the

removal of UK armaments to that

0:21:500:21:54

debate make any difference? No, it

would not.

It would make it worse.

0:21:540:21:59

It would make a difference?

Absolutely it would. The arms are

0:21:590:22:04

fuelling the conflict and causing

civilian deaths. It would absolutely

0:22:040:22:13

interrupted the conflict. Instead of

focusing energy on arming the

0:22:130:22:18

aggressor in that situation, we

would be able to redirect resources

0:22:180:22:22

into looking at the humanitarian

crisis.

What about getting on the

0:22:220:22:27

phone to Putin?

It is as those they

are the only two possibilities. It

0:22:270:22:34

is an over syndication of how

international politics works. It is

0:22:340:22:38

not as simple as one or the other,

as though that is the end of the

0:22:380:22:42

conversation. We need to be

accountable in this country for what

0:22:420:22:46

our government does, and the

decisions that the Government is

0:22:460:22:49

making here. The arms trade with

Saudi Arabia and other repressive

0:22:490:22:53

regimes around the world has two

end.

OK.

Yes. Hello. Good morning.

0:22:530:22:59

We should be accountable. Why can't

we make a stand and say we care more

0:22:590:23:06

about human rights than making

money?

What about jobs?

What about

0:23:060:23:09

all the jobs? I know the jobs White

human are sacrificed.

If it is about

0:23:090:23:18

jobs versus human rights committee

is not a true choice.

It is being

0:23:180:23:21

presented in that way in the context

of a debate. The UK at his two

0:23:210:23:26

international treaties and has a

strong record on transparency. The

0:23:260:23:32

current events in the Middle East

and Saudi Arabia require the most

0:23:320:23:36

careful investigation and suspension

in relation to that particular

0:23:360:23:41

aspect of the arms trade. We get

very close when we moved from the

0:23:410:23:45

arms trade to manufacture of weapons

more generally. People in this

0:23:450:23:50

country don't expect national

security be expected. To give is the

0:23:500:23:53

rule of law and the space to have

debates like this. Arms provide the

0:23:530:24:01

rule of law ultimately. They provide

circumstances in which we can have

0:24:010:24:03

these debates.

If you don't mind...

I will come to you to come to that.

0:24:030:24:11

Let me just go to the audience.

I am

not sure it should be a clear-cut

0:24:110:24:16

thing as to whether we should be

proud of our arms industry in

0:24:160:24:20

general. We can give our military

defence without having to sell 48

0:24:200:24:27

Typhoon jets to Saudi Arabia. We are

still saving some jobs and we don't

0:24:270:24:31

need to fuel the anti-human rights

countries but we can still provide

0:24:310:24:35

our country defence.

We have to be

realistic. Coming back to what this

0:24:350:24:41

gentleman said, about keeping the

avenues to bring things back into

0:24:410:24:51

the Suez Canal. I have been on two

cruises in Dubai, Muscat, by

0:24:510:24:59

Somalia, by Saudi Arabia, through

the Suez Canal. When you see on the

0:24:590:25:03

map, Saudi Arabia is a very big part

and to be able to protect us, we

0:25:030:25:13

have had frigates there. They have

to protect against Somalia. There is

0:25:130:25:17

a Japanese frigate there to keep the

Suez Canal open.

You need arms to do

0:25:170:25:22

that?

We have to trust the

politicians who know the full

0:25:220:25:27

details to be there.

The human

rights abuses of people in Yemen is

0:25:270:25:31

not contingent on us having a safe

holiday in the Suez Canal. We have

0:25:310:25:35

to relate these questions much more

broadly and reducing it to economic

0:25:350:25:41

official way of justifying violence.

You remove the ethical question. I

0:25:410:25:44

am not saying that overnight all of

these populations would become

0:25:440:25:48

unemployed but I do think the

research in investment, millions

0:25:480:25:53

goes into research and development

in the military. Why is it we have

0:25:530:25:57

this model where all the money for

research and developers goes into

0:25:570:26:02

the military diagram for power? That

is a political choice.

I'm afraid

0:26:020:26:09

that has to be counted. The conflict

in Yemen was not started by us

0:26:090:26:14

supplying arms to Saudi Arabia. It

was a civil war that had been going

0:26:140:26:17

on for four years. It was a request

to the Saudis by the legitimate

0:26:170:26:21

government of the yen -- the Yemen

for an intervention to try to bring

0:26:210:26:27

it to an end. The rebels were

starting to use Iranians missiles to

0:26:270:26:32

fire into Saudi Arabia. It was a

legitimate intervention. The

0:26:320:26:36

allegation it has led to war crimes

are serious allegations which were

0:26:360:26:39

put by people on your side of the

argument. Took the British

0:26:390:26:44

government to court and

Parliamentary committees agreed it

0:26:440:26:46

was appropriate for the courts to

make a decision as to whether or not

0:26:460:26:50

international he managed Terry and

laws have been broken. The courts

0:26:500:26:54

decided quite clearly that was not

the case. -- humanitarian laws.

The

0:26:540:27:02

regime in Yemen has a right to be

able to defend itself.

Do they not?

0:27:020:27:10

None of that has anything to do with

the UK arms sales to Saudi Arabia or

0:27:100:27:15

other places. There is a political

map we must pay attention to and

0:27:150:27:20

look at. Absolutely. That is the

argument we are making. When the

0:27:200:27:25

arms trade is at the centre of that

analysis, or at the centre of the

0:27:250:27:30

conversation, at the centre of

investment, we cannot have an open

0:27:300:27:34

and transparent conversation about

it because it is being dominated by

0:27:340:27:37

the sort of need for more arms

constantly. Our politicians are not

0:27:370:27:42

going to be making honest decisions

about this if they are being wined

0:27:420:27:46

and dined by the arms industry

constantly which is unfortunately

0:27:460:27:49

the case with many of the

politicians.

To go to court is the

0:27:490:27:55

highest level of scrutiny you can

have. The court agreed it had

0:27:550:28:00

happened but also what has happened

is the Saudis definitely have an

0:28:000:28:04

operational problem in the use of

some of the munitions they have. No

0:28:040:28:07

doubt about that. The UK Government

has offered more training and advice

0:28:070:28:12

on it and it is giving that to them.

There was a point made earlier about

0:28:120:28:16

why research and develop and is so

important. The reason is that is how

0:28:160:28:20

we have been able to generate the

next level of weapons technology

0:28:200:28:23

which we are able to discriminate.

In writing capable hands there is

0:28:230:28:28

not collateral damage you would have

had in previous conflicts we're not

0:28:280:28:32

bearing that in mind.

Just finally,

by having trade contacts with these

0:28:320:28:38

countries and seeing it and framing

it in the way of self power, this is

0:28:380:28:46

a big part of this and you will have

a say on this, can we exert an

0:28:460:28:51

influence and bring countries,

because the Prince is a progressive

0:28:510:28:56

prince, a reforming prince, can we

encourage that by having dialogues

0:28:560:28:59

that go in tandem with these sales?

Absolutely not. It is a myth

0:28:590:29:04

actually. You cannot have influence

and to stop violence for example

0:29:040:29:12

while giving alms to the perpetrator

of violence.

Theresa May is raising

0:29:120:29:18

issues with him.

Not while providing

him with weapons. Not just him, it

0:29:180:29:23

is actually a long problem with

Saudi Arabia and many other

0:29:230:29:26

repressive regimes around the world.

You don't stop violence by giving

0:29:260:29:31

weapons to the perpetrator of

violence. It has never happened and

0:29:310:29:34

it is not how it works.

We have to

leave it there. I'm so sorry. If you

0:29:340:29:41

have any views on obesity, please be

free to come in on the next debate.

0:29:410:29:46

Thank you very much indeed.

0:29:460:29:49

You can join in all this

morning's debates by logging

0:29:490:29:52

on to bbc.co.uk/thebigquestions

and following the link

0:29:520:29:53

to the online discussion.

0:29:530:29:54

Or you can tweet using #bbctbq.

0:29:540:30:02

I always look at that after the

show.

0:30:030:30:05

Tell us what you think

about our next Big Question too.

0:30:050:30:08

Is obesity a matter

of personal responsibility?

0:30:080:30:10

And if you'd like to apply

to be in the audience

0:30:100:30:12

at a future show, you can email

audiencetbq@mentorn.tv.

0:30:120:30:14

We're in Brighton next week,

then Glasgow on March 25th.

0:30:140:30:17

After the Easter break,

we'll be in York on April 8th

0:30:170:30:21

to make two editions -

the usual live programme

0:30:210:30:23

in the morning, then we're recording

a one-hour special on the future

0:30:230:30:26

of the National Health

Service in the afternoon.

0:30:260:30:34

Britain needs to go on a diet,

according to the head

0:30:360:30:39

of Public Health England,

Duncan Selbie.

0:30:390:30:41

"Children and adults routinely

eat too many calories,

0:30:410:30:44

and it's why so many are overweight

or obese," he said this week.

0:30:440:30:48

He wants a 20% reduction

in the calories contained

0:30:480:30:51

in foods like pizzas,

ready meals, processed

0:30:510:30:56

meats, and takeaways

over the next six years.

0:30:560:30:59

If food manufacturers

don't heed his advice,

0:30:590:31:02

he'll ask the Government

to legislate, just as they have

0:31:020:31:06

done with the sugar tax

on sweetened soft drinks,

0:31:060:31:09

which comes into force next month.

0:31:090:31:13

No one is forced to consume sugary

drinks or eat fatty foods.

0:31:130:31:16

It's a matter of personal

taste and choice.

0:31:160:31:18

Is obesity a matter

of personal responsibility?

0:31:180:31:21

Ashley, good morning. We need to do

something, we need to ban junk food

0:31:210:31:29

advertising, this sugar tax, a fact

tax, teach people to limit calories

0:31:290:31:35

--

0:31:350:31:40

-- fat tax. Something must be done.

I would disagree with that. A lot of

0:31:410:31:49

what is propose would make things

worse. There is a need to temper

0:31:490:31:53

some of the hyperbole with which the

issue is being communicated. It will

0:31:530:31:59

only make sense of speaking of it as

an academic if it is a

0:31:590:32:07

life-threatening disease, it is not.

Very very thin people and very, very

0:32:070:32:13

fat people. There is a slightly

decreased risk of mortality in the

0:32:130:32:18

so-called overweight category. There

is a lot of moralism and I think

0:32:180:32:21

this issue is a way of communicating

aesthetic and moral and behavioural

0:32:210:32:27

judgments, how people should think,

act and behave through a medicalised

0:32:270:32:33

vocabulary because policymakers have

lost the vocabulary to communicate

0:32:330:32:35

with the public in any other way.

Kathleen, you do not think there is

0:32:350:32:39

any need for sugary drinks?

You

would ban them? I think they should

0:32:390:32:44

be banned. I do not think there is

any feasible reason to have a two

0:32:440:32:51

litre drink that can pack 1000

calories in a 500 millilitres

0:32:510:32:57

serving, it is ridiculous.

You do

not have to drink it all at once.

0:32:570:33:03

No, but why would you choose to have

14 sugars in your cup of coffee? It

0:33:030:33:09

is the same thing. Why put it in a

drink when there is no need.

How

0:33:090:33:14

would you stop people drinking it?

This is where we get to the morally

0:33:140:33:21

ambiguous area.

We are there!

People

have the choice of what they are

0:33:210:33:29

going to put in the body,

absolutely. However, we have to

0:33:290:33:33

admit and understands that we do

live in what is... It is a state run

0:33:330:33:43

education system, everything is led

by the Government and the way we

0:33:430:33:47

live our lives and that access to

education we receive and everything

0:33:470:33:50

else is given to us by our

government. When it comes to sugary

0:33:500:33:55

drinks especially, should parents

have the right to serve their

0:33:550:34:00

children that much sugar when we

know...

Should they? When we know

0:34:000:34:06

the health ramifications of that...

Should they have that right?

0:34:060:34:14

Personally, I don't think so. I do

not think any parent in their right

0:34:140:34:18

mind should be feeding an infant

something...

What about an ice

0:34:180:34:28

cream?

Come on! Ice cream is a

treat.

A drink is a treat.

You do

0:34:280:34:34

not have a drink as a treat, you

have them daily. When we are talking

0:34:340:34:39

about the consumption of sugary

drinks, you generally find those

0:34:390:34:43

people who have the sugary drinks,

it builds an almost addiction so

0:34:430:34:47

they drink more and children, we are

seeing dental problems.

This is what

0:34:470:34:53

I am talking about, how it has

become a way of talking about a lot

0:34:530:34:59

of preoccupations, a lot of

ambivalence about parenting in

0:34:590:35:01

society right now, there is a

distrust of pounds has been able to

0:35:010:35:10

exercise has an ability -- there is

a distrust of parents being able to

0:35:100:35:15

exercise responsibility for the next

generation, this idea of a hapless

0:35:150:35:19

parent pumping sugar into their

children.

I absolutely agree with

0:35:190:35:22

you.

We enlist children into this as

a way of saying, people can make the

0:35:220:35:29

choice to live their lives as they

choose, but think of the children.

0:35:290:35:35

If we remove the children from the

equation, we know cigarettes are

0:35:350:35:40

very harmful and alcohol, cigarettes

and alcohol are taxed extremely

0:35:400:35:45

highly...

They are not banned.

They

are put out of the financial reach

0:35:450:35:50

of a lot of people. You bring in

this question, is it only the poor

0:35:500:35:56

people who will suffer from the

sugar tax? Is it only the property

0:35:560:36:04

stricken -- poverty stricken

parent...

The taxes will not do

0:36:040:36:08

anything, it is symbolic politics,

the sense we know the causes of the

0:36:080:36:13

obesity problem, we know what to

do...

Why not just get rid of the

0:36:130:36:18

sugary drink substance that we know

causes harm?

Getting a very hard

0:36:180:36:24

time, the food industry, in all

this, get rid of half of their

0:36:240:36:27

products, they are seen as some

people... Cocaine mentioned in the

0:36:270:36:32

last debate, some people look on

them as drug dealers.

I think this

0:36:320:36:36

is because the Government does not

feel it can do much about physical

0:36:360:36:42

activity, it is a rise of sedentary

lifestyles and jobs in particular

0:36:420:36:47

that has gone along with the rise of

obesity but it can do something

0:36:470:36:52

about the food industry. We see

tobacco style regulations being put

0:36:520:36:56

forward, junk food brand on

television, health warnings...

Are

0:36:560:37:01

they a good thing?

Absolutely not.

Very damaging to those...

Why? There

0:37:010:37:08

is no such thing as junk food.

No

legal definition. We have food high

0:37:080:37:14

in fat, sugar and salt and it is a

huge range of products. We would not

0:37:140:37:20

see Nigella Lawson's Christmas

adverts until after the watershed if

0:37:200:37:24

this ban came in, sugary drinks,

chocolate bars, bacon, cheese,

0:37:240:37:28

orange juice... That would be bad

for business and consumers and the

0:37:280:37:36

media, not the BBC, but the

commercial stations, the so-called

0:37:360:37:39

junk food brand...

It is a tale of

two industries, the arms industry

0:37:390:37:47

and the food industry, tremendously

important this country.

It is,

0:37:470:37:51

similar in the sense because people

are blaming...

One comes quickly,

0:37:510:37:55

the other comes slowly.

What is

going on currently and what will

0:37:550:37:59

happen over the next three, four

years, with this crazy policy of

0:37:590:38:04

reducing calories in food by 20%, we

will see products getting much less

0:38:040:38:08

tasty, and we will see them get

smaller because a lot of them, you

0:38:080:38:14

cannot reformulate them to make them

healthier, you have to make them

0:38:140:38:17

smaller. People are blaming it on

Brexit, smaller chocolate bars, it

0:38:170:38:22

is Public Health England's targets,

it is a rip-off, very bad for

0:38:220:38:27

consumers, not doing anything for

obesity.

Professor Nadim Haboubi, a

0:38:270:38:33

consultant, chairman of the Welsh

obesity society, a matter of choice?

0:38:330:38:36

It is not. Absolutely not. Obesity

the disease,, A complex disease. I

0:38:360:38:45

see thousands of patients over the

last many years, so many reasons why

0:38:450:38:53

they are wood-macro, genetics,

environmental, social, they are

0:38:530:38:56

desperate to lose weight, so many

factors that have made them obese --

0:38:560:39:04

they are obese. It is about

activity, not just food, it is about

0:39:040:39:08

sedentary lives, these people need

help. Help from wire? Health

0:39:080:39:12

professionals, the media. -- help

from where? The Government. Who had

0:39:120:39:20

the power to coordinate all of this

in order to combat the silent

0:39:200:39:23

killer, the disease, obesity? Only

the government. I think the

0:39:230:39:31

government should... I am one of

those who advocate there should be

0:39:310:39:35

tax on junk food because junk food

now is very affordable, that is why

0:39:350:39:43

I practice in the hottest obesity

spot in the UK.

What is junk food?

0:39:430:39:52

Anything high in calories, fat,

sugar and salt.

A little does you

0:39:520:39:57

good, now and again, once a week?

Wait a minute.

They can is one of

0:39:570:40:02

the great joys of life.

It is a

killer. -- acre Babb is one of the

0:40:020:40:07

great joys of life. You have to run

three miles to burn it off.

If that

0:40:070:40:16

is the deal, that is the deal!

You

want to translate food into this

0:40:160:40:23

biochemical thing, but only so much

good in your mouth as the powers

0:40:230:40:27

deem acceptable, but that is not

what food is about, it is a social

0:40:270:40:32

thing, a cultural thing, continuity

between generations, enjoyment, all

0:40:320:40:37

of this hectoring people, it turns

off a huge portion of the population

0:40:370:40:41

from the political class because it

offers nothing to people accept...

0:40:410:40:46

The future will be terrible, we will

take away your small pleasures, that

0:40:460:40:50

sort of thing, people are, like, no,

thanks.

The people having take away

0:40:500:40:56

several times a day, is that a

choice? Why are they doing that?

0:40:560:41:01

They need help.

I would like to add

in the, Professor Haboubi, I think

0:41:010:41:09

obesity.

Can I introduce you? Holly

MacGillivray, plus size model,

0:41:090:41:17

positive body campaigner.

It is one

of the only accepted prejudices

0:41:170:41:23

still out there. I do not have a

moral obligation to be smaller, to

0:41:230:41:27

go on a diet, to fit into your idea

of what I should look like and

0:41:270:41:32

which...

APPLAUSE

0:41:320:41:36

And once again, we are making

stereotypes.

Do you think I eat a

0:41:360:41:41

takeaway every day, Professor

Haboubi?

Did I say that?

You said,

0:41:410:41:47

these people, I am wood-macro, I am

not eating a takeaway every night --

0:41:470:41:53

I am obese.

I said it is complicated

by many factors, not caused only by

0:41:530:42:01

eating junk food, so many things.

Emotional things, psychological

0:42:010:42:07

things. I deal with the subject in

an individualised manner.

What do

0:42:070:42:12

you think of the body positive idea?

The bigger you are, the more

0:42:120:42:18

unhealthy you are, whether you like

it or not. If you are well and

0:42:180:42:21

healthy at the age of 20, if you are

not diabetic now, you are

0:42:210:42:27

prediabetic, maybe...

I agree, of

course, the bigger you are, the more

0:42:270:42:31

and healthy you are, I am not

ignorant of science, I totally

0:42:310:42:34

understand, if you eat too many

calories, your waistband will

0:42:340:42:38

expand. However, it is not that

simple.

Cancer is more common in

0:42:380:42:46

those who are obese.

This narrative

of we are eating too many calories,

0:42:460:42:54

it makes a nice, simple public

health message, but the science is

0:42:540:42:59

not that straightforward, it is

extraordinarily complicated. Say we

0:42:590:43:02

will reduce the calories in the

food, a huge amount of the science

0:43:020:43:06

is going the other direction, that

means we will probably put more

0:43:060:43:10

carbohydrate in the food and people

will get more hungry or reduce

0:43:100:43:13

portion sizes, Hector even more, bad

morality, making it difficult to

0:43:130:43:22

have good policy advice.

How do you

manage the problem of obesity?

0:43:220:43:30

Ashley, answer his question.

I do

not think there is a problem of

0:43:300:43:33

obesity. The number has not

increased since 2002.

The diagnosis

0:43:330:43:40

of diabetes has doubled over the

last 20 years.

There are children

0:43:400:43:45

under the age of ten...

Children

under the age of ten, you walk along

0:43:450:43:52

the streets, any high street, you

can see three, four-year-olds who

0:43:520:43:57

are clinically obese, what would you

do about it?

We are trying to say

0:43:570:44:03

there is a certain look which is fit

and healthy and actually other

0:44:030:44:08

people, would put them on trial for

the way they look, and that to me is

0:44:080:44:12

ethically compromised. Most of... A

lot of the most physically looking

0:44:120:44:18

healthy specimens which I know has

friends have had serious mental

0:44:180:44:21

health issues, the correlation

between health and the way your body

0:44:210:44:26

looks... It connects even to the

question, I do not want to defend

0:44:260:44:31

Donald Trump, but some of the body

shaping associated with Donald Trump

0:44:310:44:36

has been abhorrent -- body shaming.

People who look a certain weight,

0:44:360:44:42

calling them somehow disease. We

need to get out of the medicalise

0:44:420:44:49

language...

Sarah? I completely

agree that it is not supposed to be

0:44:490:44:54

about how people look.

It is

problematic to say we need to move

0:44:540:44:58

away from medicalise language

because the issue is not about how

0:44:580:45:01

people look, it is about health. We

know that being overweight or obese,

0:45:010:45:06

the longer it goes on, the more it

is associated with disease outcomes

0:45:060:45:11

like cancer, heart disease,

diabetes. While it is true to say

0:45:110:45:15

that in the recent past we have not

seen rates of overweight and obesity

0:45:150:45:19

going up, they do not seem to be

going down either, more than six in

0:45:190:45:24

ten UK adults are overweight or

obese, three in ten children are, we

0:45:240:45:28

do need to do something.

What do we

need to do?

0:45:280:45:35

Some people say it is about eating

takeaways and about banning junk

0:45:350:45:40

food. Somewhat boring Lake Manyara

is in the middle for the people have

0:45:400:45:46

responsibility for what at the end

of the day they put on their trays.

0:45:460:45:51

You would banning advertising on

television?

What Cancer Research UK

0:45:510:45:59

would like to see is an extension to

the current laws we have. This

0:45:590:46:05

marketing is bad for children and we

have banned it during kids TV. Kids

0:46:050:46:08

don't just watch that, they spend

times their family. It would make

0:46:080:46:16

sense to extend regulations that we

have put into place to do.

They

0:46:160:46:23

sponsor some of the great sporting

events. There are huge problems.

0:46:230:46:27

Let's go through. Would you like to

say?

0:46:270:46:34

say?

Going on from the human level,

when you look at it on the ground,

0:46:340:46:39

people are not that motivated today.

I was thinking of a solution to it.

0:46:390:46:44

If people could all come together

and encourage one another to lose

0:46:440:46:49

weight and so on, you don't know

what goes on in their day-to-day

0:46:490:46:53

lives. You might -- they might have

something happen to them which makes

0:46:530:46:59

them depressed. Once they lose well

and gain weight and so on, only

0:46:590:47:05

together with everyone involved that

we can in Courage one another and to

0:47:050:47:10

lift ourselves back up again.

--

encourage. It starts with education.

0:47:100:47:16

There is not just one solution.

Education from children, up through

0:47:160:47:20

to adult food. Obesity is on the

rise and it is preventable, I think.

0:47:200:47:26

It does not matter what you look

like, it is about health and fitness

0:47:260:47:31

and we are living more extension we

lifestyles. There is a lot of fat

0:47:310:47:39

shaming out there but we are not

talking about that. You do see

0:47:390:47:42

people on the high street with

children and their parents and they

0:47:420:47:46

do follow the example of parents. I

am a parent now and I am a good

0:47:460:47:51

example, hopefully, to my child not

to be fatty food. It is not about

0:47:510:47:57

having takeaways seven days a week.

It is about moderation. If you

0:47:570:48:01

wanted about by the weekend then

have it as long as there is a

0:48:010:48:06

calorie deficit. On the flip side

have be careful of being too

0:48:060:48:12

educational to the fact they possess

over calories and numbers you have

0:48:120:48:16

to enjoy food for food because it is

about enjoyment as well.

The

0:48:160:48:24

question is, is obesity a matter of

personal responsibility question in

0:48:240:48:27

its most basic form, it is. We live

in an obesogenic environment.

What

0:48:270:48:37

does that mean?

Without proper

choice? When you look at takeaways

0:48:370:48:44

and chicken shops, how often does a

supermarket have a buy one get one

0:48:440:48:48

free offer on apples, compared with

ready meals which are high in salts

0:48:480:48:52

and facts and that kind of thing? On

a personal level we do all have a

0:48:520:48:58

responsibility. I am an example of

that. I had gym membership I was

0:48:580:49:02

using. I went to the gym one day

nearly two years ago and stood on

0:49:020:49:06

the scales and saw that my weight in

stones and lbs, rather than in

0:49:060:49:15

kilograms which meant nothing to me

at the time, and I saw I was 17

0:49:150:49:19

stone. I said to myself that is

going to stop.

Never the other would

0:49:190:49:23

have voted because they have their

headphones on.

I saw a programme

0:49:230:49:28

advertised on my local newspaper

website for the two days later I

0:49:280:49:31

joined that. A programme called fact

that book, I now coach in Somerset.

0:49:310:49:39

We promote an all-round approach.

--

football. What was the Association

0:49:390:49:48

of willpower like?

You're lucky if

you can afford to join a gym.

So

0:49:480:49:53

many people cannot do that. Exactly.

Now I do not have gym membership

0:49:530:49:58

because I go out running and that is

free. From the willpower point of

0:49:580:50:02

view, it was, to me, it was taking

that responsibility. It was looking

0:50:020:50:11

at... I don't promote any particular

kind of diet or anything like that.

0:50:110:50:16

What I say to the guys in my league

and we have leaks all around the

0:50:160:50:22

country, they need to make

sustainable life changes.

You tell

0:50:220:50:26

that to somebody who's pleasure in

life is a cigarette. You need to

0:50:260:50:32

make a sustainable life change that

is the difficult thing, isn't it?

0:50:320:50:40

One problem that play, it is like, I

went online the other day just

0:50:400:50:48

before I wrote a piece for the

Guardian and I do it a theoretical

0:50:480:50:55

shop for a family of four and I did

it over a period of 14 evenings. My

0:50:550:51:01

mission was to feed his family of

four for 14 evenings for the

0:51:010:51:06

cheapest I possibly could. After

going through all of the major

0:51:060:51:11

supermarkets, including a rather

well-known frozen food retailer, 75

0:51:110:51:15

chicken nuggets in batter £3. One

chicken breast to pounds 25p. A

0:51:150:51:22

cabbage 60p. Eight kilo of frying

chips, 79p. When parents can all

0:51:220:51:31

went anyone, especially when you

take single middle-aged men are a

0:51:310:51:36

perfect demographic because you find

many of them are living in one room

0:51:360:51:39

in shared houses with no cooking

facilities. How can it be a personal

0:51:390:51:48

responsibility?

What to do about the

79p bag of chips?

I would make the

0:51:480:51:53

bad stuff more expensive and the

good stuff cheaper.

How much would

0:51:530:51:57

it be in your world?

Still 79p

because that is all I can afford.

If

0:51:570:52:04

I can come back, and I will come

back to you in a minute because you

0:52:040:52:09

are Health Minister for a while. We

mentioned kebabs, on a Friday night,

0:52:090:52:17

after you have seen Scotland losing

the rugby and you're on your way

0:52:170:52:20

home, at the back. The nice thing

occasionally. Would you let yourself

0:52:200:52:25

have occasional treats like fish and

chips?

Definitely. I was out for a

0:52:250:52:30

curry last night. What I have done

through sustainable life changes I

0:52:300:52:34

have made is I have been able to

reduce my calorie intake throughout

0:52:340:52:38

the week to earn the curry, as such.

Exactly. I am one of those who

0:52:380:52:44

advocates activity. If you

0:52:440:52:52

advocates activity. If you want

this, the activity symbol would say

0:52:540:52:55

you would need to burn off this

amount. You would be surprised. 350

0:52:550:53:05

calories in a sandwich or whatever.

If you put next to it you need to

0:53:050:53:09

run a mile to burn it off, they

would probably go for something

0:53:090:53:15

without mayonnaise, for example.

As

a doctor, what do you think would

0:53:150:53:19

happen people burnt off 2000

calories a day? You would burn off

0:53:190:53:23

hundreds of calories in your sleep.

Nobody burns 3000 calories in a day.

0:53:230:53:31

-- 2000. A normal sedentary

lifestyle you would burn 2000

0:53:310:53:34

calories.

The most important single

need now is actually sedentary life.

0:53:340:53:45

You don't have to go for a run. If

you tell people they need to burn up

0:53:450:53:49

every calorie they consumed by

running they would die of starvation

0:53:490:53:53

in a week. Also with the world of

work and time, there is a huge issue

0:53:530:54:01

about lifestyle and demands of work

in terms of ability to focus on

0:54:010:54:05

these choices.

If we don't address

that we will continue to have this

0:54:050:54:09

problem.

That is what people should

care about. It is an aesthetic

0:54:090:54:14

thing. We not shaming people, it is

about your health and medical eyes

0:54:140:54:20

wave making those judgments. I don't

like the you look for your fact

0:54:200:54:24

body. I am concerned about your

health. You do not care about that.

0:54:240:54:29

You have no idea what is going in

that person's body. You do not like

0:54:290:54:36

it because they are fat.

Without

that shaming badly, I fully agree

0:54:360:54:42

with you. At that particular time I

was on water retention tablets are

0:54:420:54:46

my heart was really bad. I got out

of hospital for pneumonia is getting

0:54:460:54:50

infection after infection after

infection and I ballooned. When I

0:54:500:54:53

tried to speak, sensibly, about that

this is food poverty can this is

0:54:530:55:02

what is happening this is the

situation people are living in,

0:55:020:55:05

there are people living in single

rooms with one microwave, how are

0:55:050:55:08

they going to have billions of

vegetables? What I got was, you are

0:55:080:55:14

fat, you obviously don't go without

food. And this is the narrative that

0:55:140:55:18

people are throwing back.

Philip

Dunne, does the Government need to

0:55:180:55:25

go further?

This is what I was going

to touch on. There is a lot of talk

0:55:250:55:30

today in this very interesting

debate about education and

0:55:300:55:33

responsibility. I think education,

the Government does have a role

0:55:330:55:37

buying Courage in, as Duncan Selbie

in your introduction has done last

0:55:370:55:42

week, publication of calorific

content in stuff that people buy. --

0:55:420:55:48

encouraging. It might not answer

everything but I think the activity

0:55:480:55:52

register is quite good idea to give

that information to people as well.

0:55:520:55:56

There is an educational aspect the

Government has a role to play in and

0:55:560:56:06

the other is in responsibility. We

have introduced corporate

0:56:060:56:07

responsibility to the food chain

through requesting reduction in salt

0:56:070:56:10

on a voluntary basis which has been

very successful in bringing down

0:56:100:56:13

salt content by 20%. We are doing

the same with sugar content by

0:56:130:56:17

requesting reduction was sugar

content and with introducing a levy

0:56:170:56:22

on soft drinks. Maybe more can be

done in that area. The point that

0:56:220:56:25

was made by the Lady of their about

the wedding advertising jarring

0:56:250:56:31

children's slots, some of these

price promotions encouraging people

0:56:310:56:35

to meet more than a treat and

routinely, there is potentially a

0:56:350:56:39

role for trying to do what we have

done with tobacco for you mentioned

0:56:390:56:44

the advertising contribution made by

food manufacturers. Formula 1 is to

0:56:440:56:48

be almost entirely financed by

tobacco advertisers. We banned it

0:56:480:56:52

and make no difference. Television

companies pay for most of Formula 1

0:56:520:56:56

these days.

Chris... The question

is, is obesity personal

0:56:560:57:03

responsibility? If it is, there is

no need for government action. We

0:57:030:57:07

have not got into that question. I

think it is of the US that obesity

0:57:070:57:12

is not a personal thing. -- it is

obvious that obesity is not a

0:57:120:57:18

personal thing goes that we have

someone who has lost weight and

0:57:180:57:21

someone who is overweight and happy

being so. There is no need for

0:57:210:57:26

government action. People are obese

for an obvious reason, they are not

0:57:260:57:30

doing enough exercise, and they are

eating too much food. It is

0:57:300:57:38

perfectly feasible to make a trade

off. I don't want to go to the gym

0:57:380:57:42

and I want to eat tasty food and I

don't appreciate the Government

0:57:420:57:45

taxing and reformulating soft

drinks. It will not be possible to

0:57:450:57:56

buy proper Ribena shortly. There are

already diet drinks for those who

0:57:560:57:59

want them.

We have got to leave it

there but I think Ribena is a very

0:57:590:58:04

good idea for another debate on The

Big Questions. As always with those

0:58:040:58:10

debates will continue online and on

twitter.

0:58:100:58:12

Next week, we're in Brighton,

so do join us then.

0:58:120:58:19

Enjoy your little pleasure

throughout the day. Goodbye from

0:58:190:58:24

Newport and have a really wonderful

Mothering Sunday.

0:58:240:58:26

Nicky Campbell presents topical debate from Lliswerry High School, Newport. Should Britain be proud of its arms trade? Plus is obesity a matter of personal responsibility?