Browse content similar to Loving, Gold, Toni Erdmann. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
in particular Chelsea v Arsenal in the lunchtime kick-off tomorrow. | :00:00. | :00:00. | |
Now though on BBC News, it's time for The Film Review. | :00:00. | :00:21. | |
Hello and welcome to The Film Review on BBC News. | :00:22. | :00:23. | |
To take us through this week's cinema releases is Mark Kermode. | :00:24. | :00:28. | |
Well, we are in awards season. We have Loving, and Oscar-nominated | :00:29. | :00:46. | |
drama. We have Gold starring Matthew McConnell may, and Toni Erdmann, | :00:47. | :00:53. | |
with a two and three quarters hour German comedy. I look forward to | :00:54. | :01:00. | |
hearing what you say about that. Loving is a true story about a | :01:01. | :01:07. | |
couple who helped to change America. It is about the pregnant bride of | :01:08. | :01:13. | |
Richard Loving. The couple get married in Washington, DC because | :01:14. | :01:17. | |
there is less paperwork. They come back only to be arrested, imprisoned | :01:18. | :01:21. | |
and forced to leave the state, which does not agree with their marriage. | :01:22. | :01:26. | |
You are not allowed to be married. They have to move away. They write a | :01:27. | :01:33. | |
letter to Bobby Kennedy. Despite the fact they are very private people | :01:34. | :01:37. | |
and the film is a keen to point out how much they wanted to keep | :01:38. | :01:41. | |
themselves to themselves. They find themselves in the middle of a battle | :01:42. | :01:44. | |
which is going from court to court and apparently all the way to the | :01:45. | :01:47. | |
Supreme Court. Here is a clip. You goo to the Virginia | :01:48. | :01:55. | |
State Court next, right? The lawyers told us | :01:56. | :01:57. | |
not to expect much. We may lose the small battles | :01:58. | :02:03. | |
but when the big war. What really love about this film is | :02:04. | :02:31. | |
it is basically a love story between these two people, ordinary people | :02:32. | :02:35. | |
finding themselves in extraordinary circumstances. They did not want to | :02:36. | :02:39. | |
be part of this huge nationwide case. What the director does is he | :02:40. | :02:45. | |
resists any form of grandstanding. As the story goes on, this is a | :02:46. | :02:52. | |
really important case. It will have a significant effect. It keeps us | :02:53. | :02:55. | |
focused on them and their relationship. The opportunities for | :02:56. | :03:02. | |
grandstanding, in the courtroom, banging tables, there are so many. | :03:03. | :03:06. | |
He does not do that he keeps his focus on them the central couple. He | :03:07. | :03:14. | |
keeps it small scale. As the larger machinations happen when you stay | :03:15. | :03:18. | |
focused on the central couple and their relationship. You believe in | :03:19. | :03:25. | |
them, care in them -- about them and invest in them. The story tells a | :03:26. | :03:28. | |
much wider message but does not feel the need to waive the measure. There | :03:29. | :03:36. | |
is a scene in which they hold hands. He talks about his dream for | :03:37. | :03:40. | |
building the home and think it was very well played very well made and | :03:41. | :03:44. | |
admirably understated. That is a rarity nowadays. Let's move on to | :03:45. | :03:57. | |
Gold. Not understated. It has been compared to Waltz Of Wall Street. | :03:58. | :04:06. | |
You have basically done the review. Matthew plays a central character | :04:07. | :04:13. | |
who runs a mining company. They strike gold. The next thing you know | :04:14. | :04:19. | |
champagne corks are popping. This can only end one way. There are | :04:20. | :04:22. | |
particularly to referred to Wolf of particularly to referred to Wolf of | :04:23. | :04:27. | |
Wall Street. It does not seem to Wall Street. It does not seem to | :04:28. | :04:32. | |
put on a lot of weight and lost a put on a lot of weight and lost a | :04:33. | :04:37. | |
lot of hair. He looks bedraggled. That is not enough for the film. You | :04:38. | :04:42. | |
need to be involved in the character and not thinking I have seen this | :04:43. | :04:47. | |
done before and better elsewhere. I did spend a lot of it thinking, this | :04:48. | :04:53. | |
is a showcase for that performance. That is not enough to build a film | :04:54. | :04:58. | |
on. You keep expecting it to kick in and engage your sympathies, it never | :04:59. | :05:04. | |
does. It has all the potential but, in the end it, it is just a bit... | :05:05. | :05:13. | |
And I confess, a little bit boring. He was in Dallas Buyers Club. | :05:14. | :05:26. | |
Originally the script was pitched as Treasure Of The Sierra Madre. In its | :05:27. | :05:37. | |
dreams. Let's move on to Toni Erdmann and the German comedy. | :05:38. | :05:45. | |
Convince us. The star is absolutely brilliant. A career woman with a | :05:46. | :05:50. | |
soul crushing job of working for a consultancy firm, an oil company for | :05:51. | :05:54. | |
that she is on business in Bucharest. She is very distant from | :05:55. | :05:58. | |
her father. He turns up on her doorstep to give her a present. She | :05:59. | :06:03. | |
humours him and sympathises with him about the death of the dog. He does | :06:04. | :06:09. | |
not leave. He puts on a wig and false teeth and turns up as Toni | :06:10. | :06:14. | |
Erdmann at business meetings, insisting to her colleagues that he | :06:15. | :06:19. | |
is a life coach, a businessman, an ambassador. Whatever he is he is an | :06:20. | :06:23. | |
embarrassment to her. Here is the clip. | :06:24. | :07:08. | |
You can see from that it is a very painful form of comedy. You think | :07:09. | :07:19. | |
about a vintage episode of The Office or Abigail ??Nospace 'S | :07:20. | :07:25. | |
Party. It is a warning about globalisation and a warning about | :07:26. | :07:32. | |
60s hippy idealism and 21st-century cynicism. It is an entrenched comedy | :07:33. | :07:36. | |
about an estrangement between father about an estrangement between father | :07:37. | :07:42. | |
and daughter. Doing so in a way that is inappropriate and really awkward. | :07:43. | :07:47. | |
At times you laugh, at times you want to cry. At times he wants to | :07:48. | :07:53. | |
bury your face in your jumper. One scene involves a rendition of the | :07:54. | :08:00. | |
song, The Greatest Love Of All. It was written and directed by someone | :08:01. | :08:07. | |
who does the job of getting exactly the right moment. She is superbly | :08:08. | :08:12. | |
aided by these great performances. You sit there marvelling at the | :08:13. | :08:18. | |
changes of tone, the way in which it is melancholic and poignant for the | :08:19. | :08:22. | |
bid is awkward and painful but also funny and cruel and yet tender and | :08:23. | :08:28. | |
loving. Nothing you would expect from when you hear the description | :08:29. | :08:32. | |
of it. It is nearly three-hour comedy about a bloke with a wig and | :08:33. | :08:37. | |
false teeth annoying his daughter. It is a really fine piece of work. | :08:38. | :08:41. | |
Not for everybody but I just loved it. Sold. Thank you very much. Let's | :08:42. | :08:55. | |
go to best out and Trainspotting. There was talk about how | :08:56. | :08:58. | |
Trainspotting had become an institution and they had a lot to | :08:59. | :09:01. | |
live up to with the sequel. I think they have done it brilliantly put it | :09:02. | :09:04. | |
catches up with the characters 20 years later. As a middle-aged | :09:05. | :09:09. | |
malaise to it. It is very well directed. A very good script by John | :09:10. | :09:14. | |
Hodge. The lovely thing about the film is coming it seems to be | :09:15. | :09:20. | |
designed for people who grew up with Trainspotting. I don't know what it | :09:21. | :09:26. | |
would be like had he not seem Trainspotting first time around. Is | :09:27. | :09:31. | |
it one for the kids? What do I know about teenagers. I am 78. How do you | :09:32. | :09:36. | |
not seen the first one it would not make any sense. Why would you not | :09:37. | :09:43. | |
want to have not seen the first one? Test DVD. De Palma. What is | :09:44. | :09:54. | |
interesting is he is the sole interview. He is accused of being a | :09:55. | :09:59. | |
misogynist, ripping off Hitchcock. He is a terrific speaker. He is very | :10:00. | :10:04. | |
irascible. People say I rip of Hitchcock but I am the only drifter | :10:05. | :10:09. | |
who properly ripped off Hitchcock. It is a really interesting piece of | :10:10. | :10:15. | |
work, made with great authority. No one knows Brian De Palma's work | :10:16. | :10:20. | |
better than him. Whatever you think about his films, it is a really | :10:21. | :10:24. | |
interesting time in his company with someone who, for better or worse, is | :10:25. | :10:30. | |
very singular and has cut their own path regardless of what anyone else | :10:31. | :10:36. | |
has said. He is not a household name to many people. I think he is not a | :10:37. | :10:46. | |
name that is recognisable. People like Stephen Spielberg and Stanley | :10:47. | :10:54. | |
Kubrick. He has an extraordinary career. He has made massive movies | :10:55. | :10:56. | |
and they have gone to DVD. A quick reminder before we go that | :10:57. | :11:00. | |
you'll find more film news and reviews from across the BBC | :11:01. | :11:09. | |
online at bbc.co.uk/film. And you can catch up | :11:10. | :11:10. | |
with our previous programmes Evening. Not nice at them at the | :11:11. | :11:31. | |
moment with the wind and the rain. The combination making things quite | :11:32. | :11:32. |