Browse content similar to Episode 18. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Hello, and welcome to Debatable, where today one player must answer | 0:00:12 | 0:00:15 | |
a series of tricky questions to try and walk away with a jackpot | 0:00:15 | 0:00:18 | |
of over £3,000. But, as always, they are not on their own. | 0:00:18 | 0:00:22 | |
They will have a panel of well-known faces debating their way | 0:00:22 | 0:00:25 | |
to the answers. Will they be all talk and no action? | 0:00:25 | 0:00:28 | |
As always, that's debatable, so let's meet them. | 0:00:28 | 0:00:32 | |
Chin-wagging their way to the answers today we have retired MP | 0:00:32 | 0:00:35 | |
and writer Ann Widdecombe, we have broadcaster Rick Edwards, | 0:00:35 | 0:00:38 | |
and TV presenter Rav Wilding. | 0:00:38 | 0:00:40 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:00:40 | 0:00:42 | |
Rick, you're in the centre chair, you are taking hold of this panel. | 0:00:45 | 0:00:48 | |
-I certainly am. -It's a good panel, I think. | 0:00:48 | 0:00:51 | |
-It's a great panel. -It is a good panel. | 0:00:51 | 0:00:52 | |
-I'm thrilled. -So, you've done the show before. | 0:00:52 | 0:00:55 | |
-I have. -And, I mean, you were the full package. | 0:00:55 | 0:00:58 | |
You had the brains, you had the looks, you had the charisma, | 0:00:58 | 0:01:00 | |
I mean, we're not putting any pressure on you here. | 0:01:00 | 0:01:04 | |
I love the way he said, "You HAD the looks". | 0:01:04 | 0:01:06 | |
-As if they've now gone. -I know, I know. | 0:01:06 | 0:01:08 | |
Reminding me of a better time. | 0:01:08 | 0:01:09 | |
We just want to know, Rick, is it still there? | 0:01:09 | 0:01:13 | |
I wasn't entirely sure it was the first time. | 0:01:13 | 0:01:15 | |
-Oh, it was. -I'm thrilled to be asked back, clearly. | 0:01:15 | 0:01:17 | |
It very much was, and welcome back, Ann. | 0:01:17 | 0:01:19 | |
Thank you, thank you. | 0:01:19 | 0:01:21 | |
Now, in a Strictly way, what are you going to be bringing to the dance? | 0:01:21 | 0:01:24 | |
Well, I shan't be bringing any knowledge of pop or sport. | 0:01:24 | 0:01:28 | |
If such questions were to come up, | 0:01:28 | 0:01:30 | |
you go with the answer I do not give. | 0:01:30 | 0:01:32 | |
-Yes. -Noted. | 0:01:32 | 0:01:33 | |
Noted. Noted, Rav? | 0:01:33 | 0:01:35 | |
-So, Rav, of course, a former policeman. -Mm-hm. | 0:01:35 | 0:01:37 | |
You're going to be here to oversee things, keep things right. | 0:01:37 | 0:01:40 | |
Well, let's try. | 0:01:40 | 0:01:41 | |
-Let's try. -I think I'm going to have my work cut out, though. | 0:01:41 | 0:01:44 | |
But, yeah, law and order is probably going to be one of the strengths, | 0:01:44 | 0:01:49 | |
-if any. -That is our fully formed panel. | 0:01:49 | 0:01:53 | |
Let's meet today's contestant - it is Dave from Weston-super-Mare. | 0:01:53 | 0:01:57 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:01:57 | 0:02:00 | |
-How you doing? -Very good. | 0:02:00 | 0:02:01 | |
-Welcome to the show. -Thank you. | 0:02:01 | 0:02:03 | |
-Tell us a little bit about yourself. -Right, well, my name is Dave, | 0:02:03 | 0:02:06 | |
I'm a retired bank manager from Weston-super-Mare, | 0:02:06 | 0:02:09 | |
I've got two grown-up daughters and, having retired, | 0:02:09 | 0:02:13 | |
I'm now trying to do as much travelling as I can possibly do. | 0:02:13 | 0:02:16 | |
So what do you do in your spare time? | 0:02:16 | 0:02:18 | |
Right, I enjoy football. | 0:02:18 | 0:02:21 | |
I was a football referee. | 0:02:21 | 0:02:23 | |
Please don't hold that against me, guys! | 0:02:24 | 0:02:26 | |
And now I'm too old to run around the football field, | 0:02:26 | 0:02:29 | |
I sit in the stand and assess other referees and coach them so that | 0:02:29 | 0:02:33 | |
hopefully they can progress their careers through. | 0:02:33 | 0:02:35 | |
So, our panel here, if any of our panel step out of line, | 0:02:35 | 0:02:39 | |
what's it going to be? Is it going to just be a straight red? | 0:02:39 | 0:02:42 | |
Is it going to be a talking to? | 0:02:42 | 0:02:43 | |
Or are you going to do that thing where they wave them away? | 0:02:43 | 0:02:46 | |
Wave them away, no, I think it will just be... | 0:02:46 | 0:02:48 | |
just be a gentle talking to to start with, | 0:02:48 | 0:02:50 | |
and if they step out of line then we may have to use the stepped approach | 0:02:50 | 0:02:54 | |
-with the captain. -OK, you are going to have to keep a | 0:02:54 | 0:02:56 | |
referee's eye on them because you can only choose one of them to play | 0:02:56 | 0:02:59 | |
-the Final Debate at the end of the show. -Yes, right. | 0:02:59 | 0:03:02 | |
-Ready to play? -Excellent, yes. -OK, here we go, let's play Round One. | 0:03:02 | 0:03:05 | |
This round is multiple choice, Dave. | 0:03:08 | 0:03:10 | |
Each question contains four possible answers, | 0:03:10 | 0:03:13 | |
four questions in this round, each correct answer is worth £200. | 0:03:13 | 0:03:17 | |
A possible £800 up for grabs. | 0:03:17 | 0:03:20 | |
So the best of luck to you, best of luck to the panel, | 0:03:20 | 0:03:22 | |
here's your first question. | 0:03:22 | 0:03:24 | |
Right. Well, I don't think that it would be a brown bear | 0:03:43 | 0:03:49 | |
or a wolf because they are a little bit too vicious to be let out | 0:03:49 | 0:03:53 | |
into Scotland, so... | 0:03:53 | 0:03:55 | |
I mean, you've clearly not had a night out in Glasgow. | 0:03:55 | 0:03:58 | |
No, I haven't actually. Without knowing the answer, | 0:03:58 | 0:04:01 | |
my leaning would be towards the Irish elk, but... | 0:04:01 | 0:04:05 | |
OK, you're leaning towards the Irish elk in Scotland. | 0:04:05 | 0:04:08 | |
Panel, let's see if you can shed some light on this. | 0:04:08 | 0:04:11 | |
Your debate starts now. | 0:04:11 | 0:04:12 | |
Well, I rather share the view that it won't be brown bears. | 0:04:12 | 0:04:16 | |
I mean, would you like to meet a brown bear when you were walking in | 0:04:16 | 0:04:19 | |
-the Scottish Highlands? -I'd absolutely love to, Ann, | 0:04:19 | 0:04:21 | |
-but I don't... -From a distance! -Yeah. -That would be incredible. | 0:04:21 | 0:04:25 | |
I feel like bears is... | 0:04:25 | 0:04:27 | |
Just feels a bit too much of a push, doesn't it? | 0:04:27 | 0:04:31 | |
-No, not bears. -Ann's convinced it isn't bears so we're going to | 0:04:31 | 0:04:34 | |
-leave bears alone. -What about wolves? | 0:04:34 | 0:04:35 | |
-Wolves. -Same? -The thing about wolves is, there | 0:04:35 | 0:04:39 | |
have been conversations about the possibility of bringing wolves back | 0:04:39 | 0:04:42 | |
to the British Isles, I know that, but I don't think it's happened. | 0:04:42 | 0:04:46 | |
What's the normal habitat for a beaver, does anyone know? | 0:04:46 | 0:04:49 | |
-River. -River. -Building dams. | 0:04:49 | 0:04:51 | |
So, Scotland, it would suit all of that? | 0:04:51 | 0:04:53 | |
-It would. Yeah, yeah, yeah. -Have they ever been extinct in Scotland? | 0:04:53 | 0:04:56 | |
-Woods, rivers? -I think... | 0:04:56 | 0:04:58 | |
-Hmm. -This is a reintroduction. | 0:04:58 | 0:05:00 | |
-That is a pertinent question. -I don't think they've been extinct. | 0:05:00 | 0:05:03 | |
So you think beavers are there but they've always been there? | 0:05:03 | 0:05:06 | |
Well, that's my gut instinct. I don't know that. | 0:05:06 | 0:05:08 | |
I think I might just go with Irish elk. | 0:05:08 | 0:05:11 | |
Yeah, but I sort of hate to go for Irish elk and it be wrong and then | 0:05:11 | 0:05:15 | |
Patrick to say, "It is an IRISH elk, we're talking about Scotland". | 0:05:15 | 0:05:19 | |
-And for us to go... -Which is a very good point. | 0:05:19 | 0:05:22 | |
-You know what I mean? -I wouldn't possibly say that! | 0:05:22 | 0:05:25 | |
I think you would be delighted if we said Irish elk and it was wrong. | 0:05:25 | 0:05:28 | |
And you say Irish elk. | 0:05:28 | 0:05:30 | |
I would go beavers. | 0:05:30 | 0:05:31 | |
-Beavers. -Beavers. | 0:05:31 | 0:05:32 | |
Butthead? | 0:05:34 | 0:05:35 | |
Beg your pardon? Beavers. | 0:05:36 | 0:05:38 | |
-Beavers? -Beavers. | 0:05:38 | 0:05:41 | |
We are going to go with beavers. | 0:05:41 | 0:05:45 | |
OK, I'm assuming that Butthead was an elk reference? | 0:05:45 | 0:05:49 | |
It was. It was very clever. | 0:05:49 | 0:05:52 | |
Didn't like it, didn't like it at all. | 0:05:52 | 0:05:54 | |
I'm going to stick with my thought and go Irish elk on this one because | 0:05:54 | 0:05:58 | |
there's a little bit of uncertainty in the panel on it, so... | 0:05:58 | 0:06:02 | |
OK. | 0:06:02 | 0:06:03 | |
For £200, the correct answer is... | 0:06:04 | 0:06:07 | |
..beavers. | 0:06:13 | 0:06:15 | |
-Sorry, guys! -Oh! | 0:06:15 | 0:06:16 | |
It's all right, Dave, it's not personal. | 0:06:16 | 0:06:18 | |
-Sorry, sorry, sorry. -Beavers. Native Scottish beavers | 0:06:18 | 0:06:20 | |
were hunted to extinction in the 16th century but Eurasian beavers | 0:06:20 | 0:06:24 | |
from Norway were released in Argyll in 2009, and they will now be given | 0:06:24 | 0:06:29 | |
protected status. | 0:06:29 | 0:06:30 | |
The Irish elk, AKA the giant deer, have been extinct since the ice age. | 0:06:30 | 0:06:35 | |
Dave, nothing for that. Still three questions in this round, though. | 0:06:37 | 0:06:40 | |
Plenty of chances to get some cash on the board. | 0:06:40 | 0:06:42 | |
Here's your next question. | 0:06:42 | 0:06:44 | |
Absolutely no idea whatsoever. I'm very much open to persuasion | 0:07:00 | 0:07:05 | |
-on this one. -OK. I'm sure our panel will bring their extensive | 0:07:05 | 0:07:08 | |
food knowledge to this. Panel, your debate starts now. | 0:07:08 | 0:07:11 | |
-Yeah. -No idea. | 0:07:11 | 0:07:13 | |
OK, does anyone know what cornichon is? | 0:07:13 | 0:07:16 | |
Yeah, cornichon is like a little gherkin. | 0:07:16 | 0:07:18 | |
-OK. -So like a tiny, little pickled cucumber. -OK. | 0:07:18 | 0:07:24 | |
On that basis, I feel like cornichon has already got another name | 0:07:24 | 0:07:27 | |
-in gherkin. -In gherkin! -It can't have that many names, | 0:07:27 | 0:07:29 | |
-it can't be greedy. -Yeah, garbanzo, what are we talking about? | 0:07:29 | 0:07:32 | |
-Is that Italian, do you think? -It sounds Italian. | 0:07:32 | 0:07:34 | |
Because the only alternative name on that board I know is cauliflower, | 0:07:34 | 0:07:39 | |
which I believe is chou-fleur, is that right, in French? | 0:07:39 | 0:07:41 | |
Ooh! I like it! | 0:07:41 | 0:07:43 | |
But then, if we're talking Italian, that doesn't really help at all. | 0:07:43 | 0:07:46 | |
No, it feels like you are just bragging about your French. | 0:07:46 | 0:07:48 | |
-Yes, yes. -Courgette is zucchini. | 0:07:48 | 0:07:51 | |
-Oh, very good. -Oh, well done. | 0:07:51 | 0:07:53 | |
Which leaves us with chickpea but that garbanzo just doesn't sound | 0:07:53 | 0:07:56 | |
-like... -It doesn't sound right. -It doesn't sound right, does it? | 0:07:56 | 0:07:59 | |
-My gut instinct is no. -No, I'm with you, I'm with you. | 0:07:59 | 0:08:02 | |
And it is a gut-based question. | 0:08:02 | 0:08:04 | |
Ho, ho, ho(!) | 0:08:04 | 0:08:06 | |
My gut would go chickpea, and I've got no idea why. | 0:08:06 | 0:08:08 | |
OK. Well, do you know what? | 0:08:08 | 0:08:11 | |
I can't offer anything else other than that. | 0:08:11 | 0:08:13 | |
I don't know. I'm happy to go with chickpea but I don't know, Dave, | 0:08:13 | 0:08:18 | |
and none of us know, actually. | 0:08:18 | 0:08:20 | |
So we're going to go with my ill-informed gut | 0:08:20 | 0:08:25 | |
and we're going to go, weirdly, with chickpea. | 0:08:25 | 0:08:28 | |
So the key phrase in that debate, Dave, | 0:08:28 | 0:08:30 | |
comes from Ann, when she says, "None of us know". | 0:08:30 | 0:08:33 | |
"None of us know". Last time I went on my own and got nowhere, | 0:08:33 | 0:08:36 | |
so let's go chickpea with the panel. | 0:08:36 | 0:08:39 | |
OK, on the basis that when you went alone it didn't work out, | 0:08:39 | 0:08:42 | |
you're going for chickpea, you're going with the panel. | 0:08:42 | 0:08:45 | |
For £200, the correct answer is... | 0:08:45 | 0:08:48 | |
-It is chickpea! -Oh, thanks, guys! | 0:08:55 | 0:08:58 | |
Well done. Oh, well done, sir, brilliant. | 0:08:59 | 0:09:01 | |
-Good knowledge, panel(!) -Never in doubt(!) | 0:09:01 | 0:09:03 | |
Absolutely. Never in doubt. | 0:09:03 | 0:09:04 | |
-Never in doubt, never in doubt. -It was a bit of a "gimme", I thought. | 0:09:04 | 0:09:07 | |
Especially in North America, chickpeas are known as | 0:09:07 | 0:09:10 | |
garbanzo or the garbanzo bean. | 0:09:10 | 0:09:12 | |
-The term garbanzo comes from Spanish. -Spanish, yeah. | 0:09:12 | 0:09:15 | |
Well played, Dave, though, it means you are up and running. | 0:09:15 | 0:09:18 | |
£200 in the prize pot. | 0:09:18 | 0:09:19 | |
-APPLAUSE -Thank you. | 0:09:19 | 0:09:23 | |
Here comes your next one. | 0:09:23 | 0:09:24 | |
I'm not a great horse racing fan. | 0:09:44 | 0:09:47 | |
I know Party Politics won the Grand National. | 0:09:47 | 0:09:51 | |
That's not a lot of help. | 0:09:51 | 0:09:53 | |
OK, well, hold that thought. | 0:09:53 | 0:09:55 | |
So, Party Politics, Ann, I'm sure we can get to the bottom of this. | 0:09:55 | 0:09:59 | |
Your debate starts now. | 0:09:59 | 0:10:01 | |
No, I do wish I'd known he was running | 0:10:01 | 0:10:03 | |
because I would have backed him. | 0:10:03 | 0:10:05 | |
Three of those years are general election years, but 1990 was also | 0:10:05 | 0:10:10 | |
very famous for the fall of Thatcher. | 0:10:10 | 0:10:12 | |
So if one's talking about memorably, I'm trying to link it to a | 0:10:12 | 0:10:16 | |
party but, well, you know, any of them will do. | 0:10:16 | 0:10:19 | |
-I... I... -'87 seems a long time ago for something... | 0:10:19 | 0:10:22 | |
I remember hearing Party Politics from the commentator | 0:10:22 | 0:10:26 | |
-shouting the name. -Do you? -OK. -Right. | 0:10:26 | 0:10:28 | |
But whether it's a clip I've seen or whatever, | 0:10:28 | 0:10:30 | |
but '87 does seem a long time ago. | 0:10:30 | 0:10:31 | |
Yeah, so I think 1997 is too recent. | 0:10:31 | 0:10:35 | |
I mean, this is so kind of vague but I sort of agree that '87 is a bit | 0:10:35 | 0:10:39 | |
too early, and I think that '97 is a bit too recent, | 0:10:39 | 0:10:43 | |
so I'd be going between 1990 and 1992. | 0:10:43 | 0:10:46 | |
Do we know when, within the year, | 0:10:46 | 0:10:48 | |
the Grand National is run and when the election would have been? | 0:10:48 | 0:10:50 | |
-It is always run March, isn't it? -And what about the election? | 0:10:50 | 0:10:53 | |
-I know the election, I think you will find, was May/June. -Hmm. | 0:10:53 | 0:10:56 | |
-'90 would be... -'90 was the fall of Thatcher. | 0:10:56 | 0:10:59 | |
The most memorable sort of political year because of the fall of | 0:10:59 | 0:11:01 | |
-Thatcher, would you say? -But that didn't happen until November, | 0:11:01 | 0:11:04 | |
and your interesting question is the Grand National would have been | 0:11:04 | 0:11:07 | |
in March, and nobody knew it was going to happen in November, | 0:11:07 | 0:11:09 | |
the fall of Thatcher, nobody knew it. | 0:11:09 | 0:11:11 | |
Why was it memorable? Did he do something else in the race | 0:11:11 | 0:11:14 | |
that was memorable? | 0:11:14 | 0:11:16 | |
Ran faster than the other horses. | 0:11:16 | 0:11:18 | |
-Thank you(!) -Yeah. | 0:11:19 | 0:11:20 | |
Is that memorable? For the horse, yeah. | 0:11:20 | 0:11:24 | |
With absolute confidence and conviction, | 0:11:24 | 0:11:27 | |
we're going to go with 1990... | 0:11:27 | 0:11:30 | |
two. | 0:11:30 | 0:11:31 | |
You little tease there, Rick, I see what you did there! | 0:11:32 | 0:11:35 | |
So, they've plumped for '92. | 0:11:36 | 0:11:39 | |
Right, well, I can remember refereeing a football match in the | 0:11:39 | 0:11:42 | |
pouring rain on Grand National day and I'm pretty sure that that was | 0:11:42 | 0:11:48 | |
when Party Politics won, | 0:11:48 | 0:11:51 | |
but when that was, I've no idea, but it would rule out 1987. | 0:11:51 | 0:11:55 | |
So, on that basis, 1992. | 0:11:56 | 0:12:00 | |
With the panel. | 0:12:00 | 0:12:02 | |
Going for 1992 for the year that Party Politics won the National. | 0:12:03 | 0:12:07 | |
Correct answer is... | 0:12:08 | 0:12:10 | |
It was! 1992. | 0:12:16 | 0:12:18 | |
Thank you, Rav. Thank you. | 0:12:18 | 0:12:20 | |
What are you thanking these people for, Dave? | 0:12:23 | 0:12:25 | |
Cos we got it right, Patrick! | 0:12:25 | 0:12:28 | |
They've got three out of three - it's terrific. | 0:12:28 | 0:12:30 | |
Ridden by Carl Llewellyn, the great Carl Llewellyn, | 0:12:31 | 0:12:35 | |
Party Politics beat Romany King by 2.5 lengths in April 1992, | 0:12:35 | 0:12:41 | |
just days before John Major's general election success | 0:12:41 | 0:12:45 | |
in the 1992 general election. | 0:12:45 | 0:12:47 | |
-Well played, Dave. It means your prize pot is up to £400. -Lucky... | 0:12:47 | 0:12:51 | |
Thank you. APPLAUSE | 0:12:51 | 0:12:54 | |
One more question to go on this round - here it comes. | 0:12:54 | 0:12:57 | |
I've got a feeling that, because Vasco Da Gama was the first person | 0:13:15 | 0:13:19 | |
to circumnavigate the world, that he might predate Sir Walter Raleigh. | 0:13:19 | 0:13:23 | |
My inkling is towards Marco Polo | 0:13:25 | 0:13:28 | |
but, again, I'm far from 100% certain. | 0:13:28 | 0:13:33 | |
Don't worry - our panel will talk this through. | 0:13:33 | 0:13:35 | |
They'll know nothing about this and they'll choose the right answer. | 0:13:35 | 0:13:37 | |
Panel, your debate starts now. | 0:13:37 | 0:13:39 | |
What have we got, then? Anyone... Anyone want to start us off? | 0:13:40 | 0:13:44 | |
So, Christopher Columbus - was he the USA? | 0:13:44 | 0:13:47 | |
Is that what he discovered? | 0:13:47 | 0:13:49 | |
-He discovered America. -Yes. Yes. | 0:13:49 | 0:13:51 | |
So, do we have a rough time when that would have happened? | 0:13:51 | 0:13:54 | |
-1492? -What? -As early as that? | 0:13:54 | 0:13:56 | |
-It wasn't that early, surely? -1492? -What about Marco Polo? | 0:13:56 | 0:14:00 | |
He's Venetian. | 0:14:00 | 0:14:02 | |
OK. | 0:14:02 | 0:14:03 | |
And I think he's pretty early. | 0:14:04 | 0:14:07 | |
Do we know what he discovered? | 0:14:07 | 0:14:08 | |
-I think he's sort of roaming around in the Far East, isn't he? -OK. | 0:14:08 | 0:14:12 | |
-Definitely before Raleigh's time. -Do we know what he discovered or did? | 0:14:12 | 0:14:17 | |
-Sir Walter Raleigh? -Was he bringing back potatoes? | 0:14:17 | 0:14:19 | |
He was bringing back potatoes and tobacco | 0:14:19 | 0:14:21 | |
and things of that nature, yeah. | 0:14:21 | 0:14:23 | |
And God bless him for it! | 0:14:23 | 0:14:24 | |
-Yes, I agree. -Thank you, Walter. | 0:14:24 | 0:14:26 | |
"Vasso" Da Gama? | 0:14:26 | 0:14:28 | |
He's the one I'm much less certain about. | 0:14:28 | 0:14:30 | |
Vasco Da Gama is... | 0:14:30 | 0:14:32 | |
Well, Dave said that he was the first person | 0:14:32 | 0:14:35 | |
-to circumnavigate the globe. -I don't think he did. | 0:14:35 | 0:14:38 | |
-I didn't know that, but it sounds... -I don't think he did. -Sounds good. | 0:14:38 | 0:14:41 | |
And I think that would have been the same sort of time as Columbus. | 0:14:41 | 0:14:45 | |
-I'm going to go with Marco Polo, I think. -As the first? | 0:14:45 | 0:14:48 | |
This is probably the most confident we've been - so beware, Dave. | 0:14:48 | 0:14:52 | |
We would go for Marco Polo. | 0:14:52 | 0:14:55 | |
Confidence from the panel. | 0:14:58 | 0:15:00 | |
Indeed. | 0:15:00 | 0:15:01 | |
I'm not so sure Vasco Da Gama was the first person to circumnavigate | 0:15:01 | 0:15:05 | |
-the globe now... -Dave! -It might have been Ferdinand Magellan. | 0:15:05 | 0:15:07 | |
But Vasco Da Gama was about that sort of time. | 0:15:07 | 0:15:10 | |
So, yeah, Marco Polo. | 0:15:10 | 0:15:13 | |
I think we're all agreed. | 0:15:13 | 0:15:14 | |
-Yeah. -You've gone for Marco Polo. | 0:15:14 | 0:15:16 | |
For £200, was Marco Polo born first? | 0:15:17 | 0:15:21 | |
-He was! -Well done. | 0:15:30 | 0:15:32 | |
Very nice work, Dave. | 0:15:34 | 0:15:35 | |
Marco Polo was born in Venice around the year 1254. | 0:15:35 | 0:15:40 | |
Christopher Columbus was born in Genoa in 1451. | 0:15:40 | 0:15:44 | |
In fourteen hundred and ninety two, Columbus sailed the ocean blue. | 0:15:44 | 0:15:47 | |
-Oh! -Well done. -Ah! -That's impressive! | 0:15:47 | 0:15:50 | |
-That's impressive. -Well done. | 0:15:50 | 0:15:52 | |
Vasco Da Gama was born in 1469 in Portugal | 0:15:52 | 0:15:56 | |
and played centre of midfield for Benfica. | 0:15:56 | 0:15:59 | |
Sir Walter Raleigh was born in the 1550s. | 0:16:00 | 0:16:04 | |
So, er, very well played, panel. Very well done. | 0:16:04 | 0:16:07 | |
-Well done. -Well worked out, Dave. | 0:16:07 | 0:16:08 | |
It means at the end of Round One, your prize pot is up to £600. | 0:16:08 | 0:16:12 | |
-Brilliant. -Thanks very much, guys. | 0:16:12 | 0:16:14 | |
So, Dave, how do you think the panel's faring so far? | 0:16:15 | 0:16:18 | |
Yeah, I think they're doing well. | 0:16:18 | 0:16:19 | |
They've got a good amount of intuition in there as well. | 0:16:19 | 0:16:22 | |
That's a very, very polite way of saying | 0:16:22 | 0:16:25 | |
"not much knowledge at all but quite a bit of luck". | 0:16:25 | 0:16:29 | |
OK, let's play Round Two. | 0:16:29 | 0:16:30 | |
OK, Dave, Round Two is our picture round. | 0:16:33 | 0:16:36 | |
We need you to place three pictures in the correct order. | 0:16:36 | 0:16:38 | |
Three questions in this round, £300 for each correct answer. | 0:16:38 | 0:16:41 | |
A possible £900 up for grabs. | 0:16:41 | 0:16:44 | |
Here comes your first picture question. | 0:16:44 | 0:16:46 | |
I've never, ever seen a Star Wars film. | 0:17:02 | 0:17:05 | |
I know nothing about it at all | 0:17:05 | 0:17:06 | |
but I believe Yoda is a character from Star Wars. | 0:17:06 | 0:17:10 | |
What you need is someone who may have been a teenager | 0:17:10 | 0:17:12 | |
around this time, in his bedroom, watching these films... | 0:17:12 | 0:17:16 | |
Not looking at anybody in particular, Rick. | 0:17:16 | 0:17:19 | |
Do you think I'm 45, Patrick?! | 0:17:19 | 0:17:20 | |
Let's see if our panel can sort this out for you. | 0:17:24 | 0:17:26 | |
Panel, your debate starts now. | 0:17:26 | 0:17:28 | |
Ann, have you any ideas on this one? | 0:17:28 | 0:17:30 | |
Well, I've seen all three. | 0:17:30 | 0:17:32 | |
-OK. -Did you see them in chronological order? | 0:17:32 | 0:17:34 | |
-No, I didn't. -Oh, that would've been really helpful. | 0:17:34 | 0:17:37 | |
I remember Star Wars being very big at the end of the '70s | 0:17:37 | 0:17:42 | |
and the reason I remember that was I fought the '79 election and I was | 0:17:42 | 0:17:46 | |
taken by a friend to see The Empire Strikes Back afterwards. | 0:17:46 | 0:17:49 | |
ET I remember coming out. | 0:17:49 | 0:17:52 | |
I was a little kid and that was in 1982. | 0:17:52 | 0:17:54 | |
-Oh, just bang on? -Well done. -Yeah, definitely. -Well done. -Definitely. | 0:17:54 | 0:17:57 | |
-OK, so that's interesting. -And Gremlins was... -Gremlins, | 0:17:57 | 0:18:00 | |
-I watched at the cinema. It was later. -A couple of years later. | 0:18:00 | 0:18:03 | |
Well, it was also... Stephen Spielberg directed both | 0:18:03 | 0:18:06 | |
and this was his next big one and that was in '84. | 0:18:06 | 0:18:09 | |
-No, I think that Robert Zemeckis directed Gremlins. -Oh, did he? -Yeah. | 0:18:09 | 0:18:12 | |
-Not that that's relevant. -But I do think the date is '84. | 0:18:12 | 0:18:15 | |
In which case, our real question is, | 0:18:15 | 0:18:18 | |
did this chap come in any of the prequels to | 0:18:18 | 0:18:22 | |
Return Of The Jedi? I can't see him in Star Wars at all. | 0:18:22 | 0:18:25 | |
I don't think he's in Star Wars, and I'm pretty... | 0:18:25 | 0:18:27 | |
-He's not in Empire Strikes Back, is he? -Empire Strikes Back, no. | 0:18:27 | 0:18:29 | |
I don't think he is, and if that was in '83, | 0:18:29 | 0:18:32 | |
which I've got a feeling Return Of The Jedi was, | 0:18:32 | 0:18:34 | |
-it would go right bang in the middle. -One, two, three. | 0:18:34 | 0:18:37 | |
So we think that, don't we? | 0:18:37 | 0:18:39 | |
The only thing is that I don't know when Return Of The Jedi came out. | 0:18:39 | 0:18:42 | |
Was there a four-year gap between Empire Strikes Back | 0:18:42 | 0:18:45 | |
-and Return Of The Jedi? -It's pretty long, isn't it? | 0:18:45 | 0:18:47 | |
It is quite long. | 0:18:47 | 0:18:49 | |
I was still living at home | 0:18:49 | 0:18:52 | |
-when the Return Of The Jedi came out... -Oh! | 0:18:52 | 0:18:56 | |
..because I went to see it '81-ish. | 0:18:56 | 0:18:58 | |
-Oh! -OK. | 0:18:58 | 0:19:00 | |
I mean, it would make sense to have... | 0:19:00 | 0:19:02 | |
-It would be a long gap. -..two-year, two-year, gaps. -So do you want to | 0:19:02 | 0:19:05 | |
-swap them round? -So maybe we... Shall we swap? -Yeah, let's swap. -OK. | 0:19:05 | 0:19:08 | |
That covers us just in case he does pop up in one of the earlier ones. | 0:19:08 | 0:19:11 | |
-Yeah. Agreed. -Shall we do that? -OK. -Yeah, let's do that. | 0:19:11 | 0:19:14 | |
-OK. -Now, I've got the earliest, right? | 0:19:14 | 0:19:16 | |
Yes. So Yoda, ET, Gremlins | 0:19:16 | 0:19:22 | |
is the order that we'd like to go for. | 0:19:22 | 0:19:24 | |
So, Dave, this is a first. | 0:19:26 | 0:19:27 | |
The panel bringing genuine knowledge to this question. | 0:19:27 | 0:19:30 | |
-Faulty memories, probably. -What do you make of all this? | 0:19:30 | 0:19:33 | |
Well, first of all, my wife will be shouting at the TV screen, | 0:19:33 | 0:19:37 | |
saying the answer to this cos she loves all three of those films. | 0:19:37 | 0:19:41 | |
Let's go with that order of Yoda, ET and Gremlins. | 0:19:41 | 0:19:45 | |
OK, you're going with the panel. | 0:19:47 | 0:19:49 | |
You believe Yoda was the one that appeared in a feature film first, | 0:19:49 | 0:19:52 | |
then ET and then Gremlins. | 0:19:52 | 0:19:55 | |
For £300, is that the correct order? | 0:19:55 | 0:19:58 | |
-It is! -Oh! -Yes! | 0:20:06 | 0:20:09 | |
-Well done, panel. -Excellent. -Yeah, we worked that out - | 0:20:09 | 0:20:12 | |
-we didn't even guess. -Very pleased with that. | 0:20:12 | 0:20:14 | |
-Very good last-minute swap. -Yeah. -Very good last-minute swap there. | 0:20:14 | 0:20:17 | |
-Excellent. -Yoda first appeared | 0:20:17 | 0:20:19 | |
-in the Star Wars film The Empire Strikes Back... -Ooh! -..in 1980. | 0:20:19 | 0:20:24 | |
So you were right to cover your bets by swapping that back. | 0:20:24 | 0:20:27 | |
ET - 1982, Rav. Very well remembered. | 0:20:27 | 0:20:32 | |
And then Gremlins from 1984. | 0:20:32 | 0:20:35 | |
-Good childhood knowledge there. -Spot-on. | 0:20:35 | 0:20:37 | |
-That's fantastic. -You never thought then... -Crop up all those years later! | 0:20:37 | 0:20:41 | |
..that it would ever win Dave £300. | 0:20:41 | 0:20:43 | |
-But it has! -Brilliant. | 0:20:43 | 0:20:45 | |
Very well done, Dave. | 0:20:45 | 0:20:47 | |
It means you're up to £900. | 0:20:47 | 0:20:50 | |
Thank you. Thank you, panel. | 0:20:50 | 0:20:51 | |
Here comes your next picture question. | 0:20:52 | 0:20:54 | |
Right, OK. Emeli Sande probably won round about 2012 - | 0:21:11 | 0:21:17 | |
she did the big Olympics show then. | 0:21:17 | 0:21:20 | |
Adele - did she win when she had 19 or 21? | 0:21:20 | 0:21:24 | |
And Ellie Goulding, little bit later, I would think. | 0:21:24 | 0:21:28 | |
That's my initial thoughts. | 0:21:28 | 0:21:31 | |
OK, panel, let's see if we can sort this out. Your debate starts now. | 0:21:31 | 0:21:35 | |
THEY CHUCKLE | 0:21:35 | 0:21:36 | |
-I've only ever heard of one of them... -Go on. -..and that's Adele. | 0:21:36 | 0:21:39 | |
-OK. -I haven't a clue who these people are so, Dave, | 0:21:39 | 0:21:43 | |
-whatever I say, do the opposite. -Rick, I'm sorry, this is... | 0:21:43 | 0:21:45 | |
-You're going to have to... -Yeah, it's all down to you. -Come on. | 0:21:45 | 0:21:48 | |
-I think I've met them all, actually. -Do you know about the Brits? | 0:21:48 | 0:21:51 | |
Cos we've got here the British female solo artist, | 0:21:51 | 0:21:53 | |
-as opposed to best album or something like that. -Yeah. | 0:21:53 | 0:21:57 | |
I suspect that our knowledge of the winners of Brit Awards is not | 0:21:57 | 0:22:00 | |
-detailed enough. -We're not going to be good. | 0:22:00 | 0:22:02 | |
We're going to be like, "Oh, was that best album?" | 0:22:02 | 0:22:05 | |
So, the one thing that I definitely agreed with was... | 0:22:05 | 0:22:08 | |
Emeli Sande had a huge year in 2012 and she was everywhere... | 0:22:08 | 0:22:13 | |
-Yeah. OK. -..to the point of, "Oh, you're here AGAIN, are you?" | 0:22:13 | 0:22:16 | |
19 had come out before that... | 0:22:16 | 0:22:18 | |
-Yeah. -..I think. But did she win? | 0:22:18 | 0:22:20 | |
-She must have won an award, surely. -I think she will have done. | 0:22:20 | 0:22:23 | |
-Yeah. -And that would have been about 2-10, 2-11, something like that, | 0:22:23 | 0:22:25 | |
-I think, for 19. -Yeah, so I would probably put Adele... | 0:22:25 | 0:22:28 | |
-First. -..before Emeli Sande. -That's going to be before Ellie Goulding. | 0:22:28 | 0:22:31 | |
-It's got to be before. -Ellie Goulding. | 0:22:31 | 0:22:33 | |
Ellie Goulding's been around for a while but it kind of really | 0:22:33 | 0:22:36 | |
kicked off for her in the last few years, didn't it? | 0:22:36 | 0:22:38 | |
-Yeah. -Ann's just head in hands here. | 0:22:38 | 0:22:40 | |
I remember the Beatles, if that's any use. | 0:22:40 | 0:22:42 | |
Oh, the Beatles were definitely... Have you got a Beatles card? | 0:22:42 | 0:22:45 | |
They were definitely the earliest. | 0:22:45 | 0:22:46 | |
So which one's...? | 0:22:46 | 0:22:48 | |
-So it's... -This is newest. | 0:22:48 | 0:22:50 | |
Adele. Yeah. | 0:22:50 | 0:22:52 | |
-This is the first? -This is the order we go for - | 0:22:52 | 0:22:55 | |
Adele first, Emeli Sande, | 0:22:55 | 0:22:58 | |
Ellie Goulding. That's our order. | 0:22:58 | 0:23:01 | |
That be their order, Dave. | 0:23:02 | 0:23:03 | |
Been listening to what the panel are saying. | 0:23:04 | 0:23:07 | |
Like the arguments that they've put forward, so I'm going to stick with | 0:23:07 | 0:23:11 | |
my original thought and what the panel have said, as well, | 0:23:11 | 0:23:13 | |
of Adele, Emeli Sande and Ellie Goulding. | 0:23:13 | 0:23:16 | |
Good pop knowledge from yourself, Dave, I have to say. | 0:23:17 | 0:23:19 | |
For £300, is that the correct order? | 0:23:19 | 0:23:23 | |
It IS the correct order! | 0:23:31 | 0:23:32 | |
-Well done. Well done. -So, well done. | 0:23:32 | 0:23:35 | |
Well played, Dave. Adele first won in 2012 and then again in 2016. | 0:23:35 | 0:23:41 | |
Emeli Sande first won in 2013 - you were right, guys - | 0:23:41 | 0:23:45 | |
and Ellie Goulding not till 2014. | 0:23:45 | 0:23:48 | |
Well played. Well done, Dave. | 0:23:49 | 0:23:51 | |
It means you're now up to £1,200. | 0:23:51 | 0:23:53 | |
Wow! Thank you. | 0:23:53 | 0:23:55 | |
Here comes the final picture question. | 0:23:58 | 0:24:00 | |
From the heaviest to the lightest. | 0:24:17 | 0:24:19 | |
No idea again. | 0:24:19 | 0:24:21 | |
I'll go the way it's up on the screen as an initial thought. | 0:24:22 | 0:24:25 | |
OK, panel, Dave going for the order | 0:24:25 | 0:24:28 | |
in which it sits - liver, spleen, | 0:24:28 | 0:24:29 | |
and then a pair of lungs. | 0:24:29 | 0:24:31 | |
What do you make of this? Your debate starts now. | 0:24:31 | 0:24:33 | |
I tend to agree. | 0:24:33 | 0:24:35 | |
I think the liver is the heaviest. | 0:24:35 | 0:24:37 | |
Imagining yourself holding liver that you buy at the butcher's - | 0:24:37 | 0:24:41 | |
it's actually quite heavy. | 0:24:41 | 0:24:43 | |
I've never bought human liver, is the only thing. | 0:24:43 | 0:24:45 | |
No, nor have I, but you understand entirely what I'm saying. | 0:24:45 | 0:24:49 | |
It's lovely with some fava beans and a nice Chianti. | 0:24:49 | 0:24:51 | |
The liver's solid, but the lungs - | 0:24:53 | 0:24:55 | |
they are deceptively large | 0:24:55 | 0:24:57 | |
when they're stretched out, because lungs can | 0:24:57 | 0:24:59 | |
actually cover a tennis court. | 0:24:59 | 0:25:01 | |
How do you know that? | 0:25:01 | 0:25:02 | |
When I was watching ET and Gremlins... | 0:25:03 | 0:25:05 | |
-Yeah. -..years ago... | 0:25:05 | 0:25:07 | |
I dissected some lungs. | 0:25:07 | 0:25:08 | |
I was reading some fact books at the time. | 0:25:08 | 0:25:10 | |
I still say lungs are the lightest but I am happy enough to... | 0:25:12 | 0:25:17 | |
To be overruled. | 0:25:17 | 0:25:18 | |
-Yeah, I... -Have you ever said that in your life, Ann? | 0:25:18 | 0:25:21 | |
Very occasionally! | 0:25:21 | 0:25:22 | |
I think the spleen is... | 0:25:25 | 0:25:27 | |
small. I mean, it is going to be an issue. We just kind of... | 0:25:27 | 0:25:30 | |
I guess that's the thing, isn't it? You just close your eyes | 0:25:30 | 0:25:33 | |
and imagine cradling a spleen. | 0:25:33 | 0:25:34 | |
It's not that heavy. | 0:25:35 | 0:25:37 | |
-It's not that heavy. Now do it... -Cradle a pair of lungs. -Lungs. | 0:25:38 | 0:25:40 | |
Similar weight - that's not helping. | 0:25:43 | 0:25:45 | |
-Let's do a little swap here. -OK. Are we happy with that? -Yeah, OK, | 0:25:46 | 0:25:49 | |
so the order we'll go for is liver heaviest, then the lungs, | 0:25:49 | 0:25:53 | |
then the spleen. That is our order. | 0:25:53 | 0:25:56 | |
OK, Dave, it looked like there was some science being added to this | 0:25:58 | 0:26:02 | |
until Rick started to weigh an imaginary spleen. | 0:26:02 | 0:26:05 | |
These guys have done so well so far. | 0:26:07 | 0:26:09 | |
By the law of averages, I think we may be due a fall on this one. | 0:26:09 | 0:26:13 | |
So I'm going to put the spleen back in the middle | 0:26:13 | 0:26:15 | |
and the lungs at the end. | 0:26:15 | 0:26:16 | |
-I think you're right. -Oh, OK! | 0:26:16 | 0:26:19 | |
You're going against the panel. | 0:26:19 | 0:26:21 | |
I'm going against them. | 0:26:21 | 0:26:22 | |
OK, your original thought - | 0:26:22 | 0:26:24 | |
liver, then the spleen, then the pair of lungs, | 0:26:24 | 0:26:26 | |
from the heaviest to the lightest. | 0:26:26 | 0:26:28 | |
For £300, is that the correct order? | 0:26:28 | 0:26:31 | |
Oh! | 0:26:41 | 0:26:42 | |
It's the wrong order, Dave. | 0:26:42 | 0:26:45 | |
Let's have a look at the correct order. | 0:26:45 | 0:26:47 | |
I bet they're right. I bet they're right. | 0:26:47 | 0:26:49 | |
-Oh! -The panel were right. -Guys! | 0:26:49 | 0:26:52 | |
Should have gone with the panel there. | 0:26:52 | 0:26:54 | |
The liver weighs roughly 1,560 grams. | 0:26:54 | 0:26:57 | |
-The lungs together... -Yeah, that's right. | 0:26:57 | 0:27:00 | |
..weigh approximately 1,300 grams. | 0:27:00 | 0:27:03 | |
-Yeah. -The spleen - 175 grams. | 0:27:03 | 0:27:07 | |
-Tiny. Absolutely tiny. -Much, much lighter. | 0:27:07 | 0:27:09 | |
-Dave, nothing for that question. -Not that time. -You're still doing well, though. | 0:27:09 | 0:27:13 | |
At the end of Round Two, you're up to £1,200. | 0:27:13 | 0:27:15 | |
Lovely. Thank you. Thanks, guys. Sorry about that. | 0:27:15 | 0:27:20 | |
So, how's the panel faring? | 0:27:20 | 0:27:22 | |
Still proving useful? | 0:27:22 | 0:27:23 | |
100% record, still, they've got. | 0:27:23 | 0:27:25 | |
I need to listen to other people, don't I? | 0:27:25 | 0:27:27 | |
Well done. You're up to £1,200. | 0:27:29 | 0:27:31 | |
£1,500 still up for grabs. | 0:27:31 | 0:27:32 | |
Let's play Round Three. | 0:27:32 | 0:27:34 | |
Dave, in Round Three you'll face questions that contain | 0:27:36 | 0:27:39 | |
three statements about a person, a place or a thing. | 0:27:39 | 0:27:41 | |
Only one of them is true. | 0:27:41 | 0:27:43 | |
We need you to find that true statement. | 0:27:43 | 0:27:45 | |
Three questions in this round, £500 for each correct answer. | 0:27:45 | 0:27:48 | |
A possible 1,500 quid that you can add to the prize pot. | 0:27:48 | 0:27:52 | |
Here comes your first one. | 0:27:52 | 0:27:54 | |
I think that I've read somewhere | 0:28:15 | 0:28:18 | |
that a sumo wrestler making a baby cry is considered lucky. | 0:28:18 | 0:28:23 | |
OK, panel, Dave thinks he may have read this. | 0:28:23 | 0:28:26 | |
Let's see if you can keep your lucky run going. | 0:28:26 | 0:28:29 | |
Your debate starts now. | 0:28:29 | 0:28:30 | |
Anybody been to Japan? | 0:28:30 | 0:28:32 | |
I've just got back from Japan on my honeymoon. | 0:28:32 | 0:28:35 | |
Did you slurp in a restaurant? | 0:28:35 | 0:28:37 | |
Just a bit, Ann! | 0:28:37 | 0:28:39 | |
They couldn't stop me! So I actually think that slurping in restaurants | 0:28:39 | 0:28:43 | |
is, on the contrary, encouraged. | 0:28:43 | 0:28:46 | |
-I believe so. -And it's not impolite at all. | 0:28:46 | 0:28:49 | |
And you do it with ramen, cos it's so hot | 0:28:49 | 0:28:51 | |
-and you need to get some air in... -OK, I'd go with that. | 0:28:51 | 0:28:53 | |
..to stop you burning your mouth. | 0:28:53 | 0:28:54 | |
And you noticed people doing it? No-one was arrested? | 0:28:54 | 0:28:57 | |
Oh, loads of it. No-one got arrested that I saw. | 0:28:57 | 0:28:59 | |
OK. Did you see any babies crying next to a sumo wrestler? | 0:28:59 | 0:29:02 | |
-I -made a baby cry and I felt like I had quite a good day afterwards. | 0:29:02 | 0:29:06 | |
I've not heard that but it's the kind of thing that sounds plausible. | 0:29:09 | 0:29:13 | |
-Yeah. -In kind of.... -Yeah. -In that culture. | 0:29:13 | 0:29:16 | |
And we've got the karaoke now. | 0:29:16 | 0:29:18 | |
Where it says "hear me sing", that doesn't jump out. | 0:29:18 | 0:29:21 | |
I don't think that's quite right. | 0:29:21 | 0:29:23 | |
-Or is it? -Roots and stems? -I don't speak any Japanese. | 0:29:23 | 0:29:27 | |
-Anything? -I can't remember what it means but I don't think it's | 0:29:27 | 0:29:30 | |
"hear me sing" - it's something quite... | 0:29:30 | 0:29:33 | |
That's what I'm thinking. | 0:29:33 | 0:29:34 | |
It's sort of quite weirdly poetic. | 0:29:35 | 0:29:38 | |
I'm assuming you've all sung karaoke? | 0:29:38 | 0:29:40 | |
-Don't be daft! -Yeah. | 0:29:40 | 0:29:42 | |
You must've done a little karaoke! | 0:29:42 | 0:29:43 | |
I'm tone deaf! | 0:29:43 | 0:29:44 | |
That's not a problem. | 0:29:44 | 0:29:46 | |
-It would be if you had me trying it. -It's more fun. -Yeah. | 0:29:46 | 0:29:49 | |
-Oh. Well, we know what we're doing afterwards, Ann! -We are not! | 0:29:49 | 0:29:52 | |
-I think it's the first. -Yes. | 0:29:53 | 0:29:55 | |
Our answer would be that a sumo wrestler making a baby cry is lucky. | 0:29:55 | 0:29:59 | |
So, on the basis that the panel have a 100% record, | 0:30:01 | 0:30:04 | |
based purely on luck, there must be children all the way from the studio | 0:30:04 | 0:30:08 | |
to the house in tears today. | 0:30:08 | 0:30:11 | |
I'm in agreement with the panel. I'm sure it's A, the sumo wrestler. | 0:30:11 | 0:30:16 | |
OK, it was your first thought - you thought you read that somewhere. | 0:30:16 | 0:30:19 | |
In Japan, a sumo wrestler making a baby cry is considered lucky. | 0:30:19 | 0:30:23 | |
For £500, is that true? | 0:30:23 | 0:30:26 | |
-It is! -Well done, guys. | 0:30:36 | 0:30:38 | |
It is indeed. It is | 0:30:39 | 0:30:41 | |
part of an annual festival that has been held for over 400 years. | 0:30:41 | 0:30:45 | |
Sumo wrestlers make loud noises and faces at babies | 0:30:45 | 0:30:48 | |
to get those babies to start crying. | 0:30:48 | 0:30:50 | |
Karaoke is "empty orchestra". | 0:30:53 | 0:30:55 | |
-Oh! -Ah! | 0:30:55 | 0:30:56 | |
It is actually polite to slurp noodles in restaurants - | 0:30:56 | 0:31:00 | |
it shows that you have enjoyed the meal. | 0:31:00 | 0:31:02 | |
Very well done. It means you're up to £1,700. | 0:31:02 | 0:31:05 | |
Brilliant. Thank you. | 0:31:05 | 0:31:06 | |
Another £500 up for grabs for this. Here it comes. | 0:31:09 | 0:31:13 | |
Walking on the moon was late '60s, early '70s. | 0:31:39 | 0:31:44 | |
Not sure of the split on that one. | 0:31:44 | 0:31:46 | |
Can't think why they'd pay thousands of dollars for volunteers | 0:31:46 | 0:31:49 | |
to lie in bed for weeks, so that's probably a good reason | 0:31:49 | 0:31:51 | |
for the Americans to decide to do it, | 0:31:51 | 0:31:54 | |
and I've no idea what NASA'S logo looks like. | 0:31:54 | 0:31:57 | |
So no help to you guys at all on that one, I'm afraid. | 0:31:57 | 0:32:00 | |
I mean, don't worry. | 0:32:00 | 0:32:01 | |
They've all made babies cry on the way to the studio - | 0:32:01 | 0:32:04 | |
let's see if they can keep their lucky streak going. | 0:32:04 | 0:32:06 | |
Panel, your debate starts now. | 0:32:06 | 0:32:07 | |
-Moon landing... -Well, the moon walk was | 0:32:07 | 0:32:10 | |
-right at the end of the '60s - '69. -The moon landing...? | 0:32:10 | 0:32:12 | |
-Yes. -..was '69. | 0:32:12 | 0:32:14 | |
And that was the first walk. | 0:32:14 | 0:32:15 | |
-Correct. -That was only two people. | 0:32:15 | 0:32:17 | |
-At that time. -Yeah. -But you're not going to have another one | 0:32:17 | 0:32:19 | |
within a year, which would be the end of the '60s? | 0:32:19 | 0:32:21 | |
You're certainly not going to have lots within a year, | 0:32:21 | 0:32:24 | |
because this is more than at any other time. | 0:32:24 | 0:32:26 | |
Yes, any other decade, so the '70s surely would have more than trying | 0:32:26 | 0:32:31 | |
-to get more people walking in 1969. -I think I read somewhere - | 0:32:31 | 0:32:33 | |
I can't remember - something like 16 men have actually walked | 0:32:33 | 0:32:36 | |
-on the moon. Well, that didn't all happen in '69. -The middle one... | 0:32:36 | 0:32:39 | |
-..I think is plausible, because... -I do. | 0:32:40 | 0:32:42 | |
..they'd be looking to study the effects of being... | 0:32:42 | 0:32:45 | |
-In one position for a long time, yeah. -..stationary and not moving, | 0:32:45 | 0:32:48 | |
-what the body does. -That could make sense. -That makes sense. | 0:32:48 | 0:32:50 | |
-I think that makes a lot of sense. -Which brings us on to | 0:32:50 | 0:32:53 | |
-what I presume is Latin. -It is Latin. -Anyone going to have a... | 0:32:53 | 0:32:56 | |
I'm going to have a guess and then Ann's going to tell me whether I'm | 0:32:56 | 0:32:58 | |
-right. -Go on, go on. -I think that probably means | 0:32:58 | 0:33:00 | |
-"to infinity and beyond". -Yes. -Which is from Toy Story. | 0:33:00 | 0:33:04 | |
-Well done. -So I don't think... -If you get that, that'll be amazing. | 0:33:04 | 0:33:07 | |
I think it's lying in bed. | 0:33:07 | 0:33:08 | |
OK, that would be brilliant, yeah. | 0:33:08 | 0:33:10 | |
I really do. I mean, it's the effects of immobility. | 0:33:10 | 0:33:13 | |
When you go into space, you're immobile for a very long time. | 0:33:13 | 0:33:16 | |
And they'll obviously want to test on volunteers - | 0:33:16 | 0:33:18 | |
that'd be perfect. I think the middle one. | 0:33:18 | 0:33:20 | |
Especially if you're sending people on long journeys, | 0:33:20 | 0:33:22 | |
they're going to be in stasis. You need to study that stuff. | 0:33:22 | 0:33:25 | |
This is the most confident I've been. | 0:33:25 | 0:33:28 | |
I like the sound of that. | 0:33:28 | 0:33:29 | |
Make of that what you will, Dave. | 0:33:29 | 0:33:31 | |
I think I've been sufficiently appealed to by the middle one. | 0:33:31 | 0:33:34 | |
-We will go... -Yeah. -..with the middle answer. | 0:33:34 | 0:33:36 | |
We think that NASA pay thousands of dollars | 0:33:36 | 0:33:39 | |
to people to lie in bed and study them. | 0:33:39 | 0:33:41 | |
-What do you make of that, Dave? -I'm going to go with the panel | 0:33:43 | 0:33:46 | |
and they're going to pay volunteers to lie in bed, | 0:33:46 | 0:33:49 | |
-cos it's a great job. -It would be a great job, I have to say. | 0:33:49 | 0:33:53 | |
You're going for B, you're agreeing with the panel. | 0:33:53 | 0:33:55 | |
For £500, the correct statement is... | 0:33:55 | 0:33:59 | |
-It's B! -Yes. Well done. | 0:34:11 | 0:34:13 | |
It is B. Very well done. | 0:34:13 | 0:34:16 | |
They are called bed-rest studies. | 0:34:18 | 0:34:21 | |
The purpose of the study is exactly what you said, | 0:34:21 | 0:34:24 | |
to research the microgravity on the human body. | 0:34:24 | 0:34:27 | |
There were two manned moon landings in the 1960s, | 0:34:27 | 0:34:31 | |
with four astronauts walking on the moon. But in the 1970s, | 0:34:31 | 0:34:35 | |
from 1970 to 1972, there were four moon landings, | 0:34:35 | 0:34:39 | |
with eight people walking on the moon, 12 in total. | 0:34:39 | 0:34:42 | |
"Ad infinitum et ultra" is "to infinity and beyond", | 0:34:42 | 0:34:47 | |
and it is the catchphrase of Buzz Lightyear in the Toy Story films. | 0:34:47 | 0:34:52 | |
Very well done, Rick. | 0:34:52 | 0:34:53 | |
I believe it is a 100% record from the panel. | 0:34:53 | 0:34:57 | |
Another £500 for you. | 0:34:57 | 0:34:58 | |
-Fantastic. -You are up to £2,200. | 0:34:58 | 0:35:01 | |
Thanks very much, guys. | 0:35:01 | 0:35:03 | |
Brilliant. | 0:35:03 | 0:35:05 | |
OK, one more question to go in this round. | 0:35:05 | 0:35:08 | |
Another £500 up for grabs. | 0:35:08 | 0:35:10 | |
Here we go. | 0:35:10 | 0:35:11 | |
A 100% record from our panel so far. They'll sort this out no problems. | 0:35:31 | 0:35:34 | |
Panel, your debate starts now. | 0:35:34 | 0:35:35 | |
Well, I think you can rule out publishing more novels | 0:35:35 | 0:35:38 | |
than Mary Shelley because he was a poet. | 0:35:38 | 0:35:40 | |
-Yeah. -Now, you know, unless he published, too, | 0:35:40 | 0:35:43 | |
and I don't think he did - he was a poet. He died very young. | 0:35:43 | 0:35:48 | |
-Right. -And he was writing at the same time as Wordsworth, Coleridge, | 0:35:48 | 0:35:52 | |
the Romance Poets, as they were called. | 0:35:52 | 0:35:54 | |
I've got a feeling he was the youngest of them. | 0:35:54 | 0:35:57 | |
It's a feeling. | 0:35:57 | 0:35:58 | |
-OK. -But it's quite a strong one. -OK. | 0:35:58 | 0:36:01 | |
-And then Napoleon... -What his height was, I've no idea. | 0:36:01 | 0:36:04 | |
Well, Napoleon, I believe, was 5'4". | 0:36:04 | 0:36:06 | |
-But was Keats short? -Well, that's very, very short - | 0:36:06 | 0:36:09 | |
-to be shorter than 5'4". Do you think? -Back in the day, though, | 0:36:09 | 0:36:12 | |
it was more in vogue to be short. | 0:36:12 | 0:36:14 | |
Well, not a question of in vogue. It was just the way we were developing! | 0:36:14 | 0:36:17 | |
I was joking, Ann! It's OK. | 0:36:17 | 0:36:20 | |
-It's OK. -You would've had a terrible time! | 0:36:20 | 0:36:22 | |
If I could direct height to vogue, I would be rather more than I am. | 0:36:22 | 0:36:27 | |
So we're kind of erring towards shorter than Napoleon, aren't we? | 0:36:28 | 0:36:33 | |
-I think. Just on the basis... -I know nothing to rule it out. | 0:36:33 | 0:36:36 | |
-Yeah. -I know nothing to rule that out. | 0:36:36 | 0:36:38 | |
I would go with him being shorter than Napoleon. | 0:36:38 | 0:36:41 | |
By a process of elimination, I'd arrive at that. | 0:36:41 | 0:36:44 | |
-Yeah. -OK, so our answer is "shorter than Napoleon Bonaparte". | 0:36:44 | 0:36:48 | |
What do you make of that, Dave? | 0:36:48 | 0:36:52 | |
Process of elimination and hoping that the 100% record continues, | 0:36:52 | 0:36:56 | |
I'll go with the panel and go for C, shorter than Napoleon Bonaparte. | 0:36:56 | 0:37:00 | |
You're going with the panel. | 0:37:01 | 0:37:03 | |
Was John Keats shorter than Napoleon Bonaparte, for £500? | 0:37:03 | 0:37:08 | |
-He was! -Fantastic! | 0:37:18 | 0:37:20 | |
-What a result! -Well done, Ann. | 0:37:21 | 0:37:23 | |
-I think that was mainly you. -That was just elimination. | 0:37:23 | 0:37:25 | |
I mean, well done, panel. | 0:37:25 | 0:37:27 | |
What can we say? | 0:37:27 | 0:37:28 | |
-Dream team. -Dream team. You either know it or you don't, really. | 0:37:28 | 0:37:31 | |
-That's the thing. -I don't think a panel has ever gone through | 0:37:31 | 0:37:34 | |
one of these shows with a 100% record, so hats off there. | 0:37:34 | 0:37:38 | |
Keats is reported to have been just over five feet tall. | 0:37:39 | 0:37:43 | |
Napoleon's height was historically given as 5'2" | 0:37:43 | 0:37:46 | |
but modern historians estimate that his height may have been | 0:37:46 | 0:37:50 | |
much greater, possibly 5'6". | 0:37:50 | 0:37:52 | |
Huge man. Dave, very well played. | 0:37:52 | 0:37:54 | |
At the end of Round Three, your prize pot is up to £2,700. | 0:37:54 | 0:37:58 | |
-Brilliant. -Well done. -Thanks so much. Thank you. Thank you. | 0:37:58 | 0:38:01 | |
So, only one question between you and that money. | 0:38:03 | 0:38:06 | |
If you manage to answer our Final Debate question correctly, | 0:38:06 | 0:38:09 | |
any plans for the cash? | 0:38:09 | 0:38:10 | |
Yeah, I think we'd like to do another trip, | 0:38:10 | 0:38:12 | |
possibly up to the fjords and see the northern lights, as well, on a cruise. | 0:38:12 | 0:38:17 | |
Dave, there is only one question between you and that £2,700. | 0:38:17 | 0:38:21 | |
It is, of course, the Final Debate question | 0:38:21 | 0:38:24 | |
but you are not on your own. | 0:38:24 | 0:38:25 | |
You will choose one of the 100% club here to help you in the debate. | 0:38:25 | 0:38:31 | |
So, based on their magnificent performance today, | 0:38:31 | 0:38:36 | |
who will be joining you in The Final Debate? | 0:38:36 | 0:38:38 | |
Will you play party politics with Ann? | 0:38:38 | 0:38:40 | |
Will you go to infinity and beyond with Rick? | 0:38:40 | 0:38:42 | |
Or will it be our own petit chou-fleur? Will it be Rav? | 0:38:42 | 0:38:46 | |
Well, they've all done so tremendously well, | 0:38:47 | 0:38:49 | |
it's really difficult. But I'm going to go with Rick. | 0:38:49 | 0:38:52 | |
OK, Rick, please join us as we play The Final Debate. | 0:38:52 | 0:38:55 | |
OK, Rick, Dave has chosen you. | 0:39:01 | 0:39:03 | |
I mean, he could have chosen anyone from the 100% club... | 0:39:03 | 0:39:05 | |
-Uh-huh. -..but he has put his faith in you. | 0:39:05 | 0:39:08 | |
Yeah. I mean, I hope your faith hasn't been misplaced, Dave. | 0:39:08 | 0:39:11 | |
-I'm sure it hasn't. -We just need to ride this lucky wave, | 0:39:11 | 0:39:14 | |
get you that money, get you to the fjords. | 0:39:14 | 0:39:17 | |
Dave, it is the Final Debate question so we're going to give you | 0:39:17 | 0:39:19 | |
two choices. Have a look at this. | 0:39:19 | 0:39:21 | |
Tell me what you fancy. | 0:39:21 | 0:39:23 | |
-Hmm. -Depends which sport it is, doesn't it? | 0:39:28 | 0:39:30 | |
It does. Which sport is it, Patrick? | 0:39:30 | 0:39:32 | |
Well, funny you should mention... | 0:39:32 | 0:39:34 | |
-If it's football, hurrah. -If it's football, we're in business. | 0:39:34 | 0:39:37 | |
I mean, obviously, obviously, up to you but I would probably go sport. | 0:39:39 | 0:39:43 | |
-What's your TV like? -Yeah. | 0:39:43 | 0:39:45 | |
Not bad. | 0:39:45 | 0:39:46 | |
But I don't know. If it's Downton Abbey, then we've had it. | 0:39:48 | 0:39:51 | |
-Shall we go sport? -Let's go sport. | 0:39:51 | 0:39:53 | |
We'll go sport, please. | 0:39:53 | 0:39:54 | |
-You're going for sport. -Yeah. | 0:39:54 | 0:39:57 | |
45 seconds on the clock, £2,700 up for grabs, six possible answers. | 0:39:57 | 0:40:02 | |
You know we need three correct answers. | 0:40:02 | 0:40:04 | |
Yeah. | 0:40:04 | 0:40:05 | |
Here we go on sport. | 0:40:05 | 0:40:07 | |
Here's your Final Debate question. | 0:40:07 | 0:40:08 | |
Your time starts now. | 0:40:31 | 0:40:32 | |
Bears, Dolphins, Seahawks. | 0:40:32 | 0:40:35 | |
-Oh, you're straight in with that? -That's my thoughts, yeah. | 0:40:35 | 0:40:38 | |
-I reckon... I reckon they've done that. -Dave, I love it. | 0:40:38 | 0:40:40 | |
I was going to say Dolphins, | 0:40:40 | 0:40:42 | |
pretty sure, because in Ace Ventura there's a guy who's won it and... | 0:40:42 | 0:40:47 | |
-Bears... -William Perry, the Refrigerator. | 0:40:47 | 0:40:50 | |
The Re... The Refrigerator. | 0:40:50 | 0:40:52 | |
Don't know what you're talking about, but fine. | 0:40:52 | 0:40:54 | |
-Yeah. He was... -He was the massive... | 0:40:54 | 0:40:56 | |
The massive fella, yeah. | 0:40:56 | 0:40:58 | |
-20 seconds. -And you think Seahawks? | 0:40:58 | 0:41:00 | |
I think the Seahawks, yeah. | 0:41:00 | 0:41:02 | |
I mean, I've... I'm not an American football fan | 0:41:02 | 0:41:05 | |
but I'd definitely go with Bears and Dolphins and I think... | 0:41:05 | 0:41:10 | |
-I think... -If you're... -It's the one that jumps out at me | 0:41:10 | 0:41:12 | |
-in front of the others. -If the hawk is jumping, | 0:41:12 | 0:41:15 | |
-pick the hawk - that's my motto. -Panthers are quite new. Right. | 0:41:15 | 0:41:18 | |
OK, Dave, three answers. | 0:41:18 | 0:41:19 | |
Chicago Bears. | 0:41:19 | 0:41:21 | |
Miami Dolphins. | 0:41:21 | 0:41:22 | |
Seattle Seahawks. | 0:41:22 | 0:41:23 | |
Here we go. | 0:41:26 | 0:41:27 | |
For £2,700, the first team you gave me was the Chicago Bears. | 0:41:27 | 0:41:32 | |
Have the Chicago Bears won the Super Bowl? | 0:41:32 | 0:41:35 | |
They have. | 0:41:43 | 0:41:45 | |
CHEERING AND APPLAUSE | 0:41:45 | 0:41:47 | |
Well played. Chicago Bears won the Super Bowl in '86 | 0:41:47 | 0:41:50 | |
and William Perry, the Refrigerator, played on that team. | 0:41:50 | 0:41:54 | |
Next, to keep you in the game, for £2,700, | 0:41:54 | 0:41:59 | |
have the Miami Dolphins won the Super Bowl? | 0:41:59 | 0:42:01 | |
They have! | 0:42:14 | 0:42:16 | |
-Well done. -They won in '72 and '73, | 0:42:18 | 0:42:22 | |
which brings us to the Seattle Seahawks. | 0:42:22 | 0:42:25 | |
Now, this was the one you were least sure of. | 0:42:25 | 0:42:27 | |
-Yeah, that's right. -Any other names up there? | 0:42:27 | 0:42:30 | |
Er...I would think the other possible one is the Eagles, but... | 0:42:30 | 0:42:34 | |
You think maybe the Eagles but you've gone for the Seahawks. | 0:42:34 | 0:42:37 | |
For £2,700... | 0:42:39 | 0:42:41 | |
..have the Seattle Seahawks won the Super Bowl? | 0:42:42 | 0:42:46 | |
Yes! | 0:43:07 | 0:43:08 | |
APPLAUSE DROWNS SPEECH | 0:43:10 | 0:43:12 | |
Come here, you! Come on! | 0:43:12 | 0:43:14 | |
-Well done, mate. -Well played. -Thank you. | 0:43:14 | 0:43:17 | |
The Seahawks first won the Super Bowl in 2014. | 0:43:17 | 0:43:21 | |
Very well played. Very well played, panel. Well done, Dave. | 0:43:21 | 0:43:24 | |
-You leave today with £2,700. -Thank you. | 0:43:24 | 0:43:27 | |
Thank you. | 0:43:29 | 0:43:31 | |
That is it for Debatable. | 0:43:33 | 0:43:34 | |
Just enough time for me to thank our fantastic panel - | 0:43:34 | 0:43:37 | |
to Rick Edwards, to Ann Widdecombe and to Rav Wilding. | 0:43:37 | 0:43:40 | |
CHEERING AND APPLAUSE | 0:43:40 | 0:43:42 | |
I do hope you've enjoyed watching. We will see you next time for more heated debates. | 0:43:42 | 0:43:45 | |
For now, it's goodbye from me. | 0:43:45 | 0:43:47 |