Back to Earth 2 Stargazing Live


Back to Earth 2

Similar Content

Browse content similar to Back to Earth 2. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

Welcome Back To Earth, a chance to explore some issues, shows some

:00:27.:00:30.

photographs and give a sense of what it is like working on the show.

:00:30.:00:35.

We thought we would make this little film. I am here by the

:00:35.:00:38.

Lovell telescope at Jodrell Bank and at the start of each day before

:00:38.:00:42.

every show, I like to come out here and make sure everything is working

:00:42.:00:50.

like it should be. Yeah, all good. Come with me, as I take you on an

:00:50.:00:56.

exclusive behind-the-scenes tour of Stargazing Live. It is from here

:00:56.:01:00.

that the movements of that amazing dish behind they are precisely

:01:00.:01:04.

monitored. My favourite bit is all these buttons, there's loads of

:01:04.:01:07.

buttons and you want to go like that and press them all, but you

:01:07.:01:11.

are not allowed to do that. You would get done if you were to do

:01:11.:01:18.

that, so I am not doing it. This is a room that is full of tellies, and

:01:18.:01:26.

pretty soon, I'm going to be on all of them. Having that. One of the

:01:26.:01:30.

wonders of lunchtime is when I do some shopping and get some things

:01:30.:01:35.

to recreate the diversity of our solar system. Like Mercury would be

:01:36.:01:41.

a tick tack, just by the sun. You have got Venus and are worth. And

:01:41.:01:46.

next to them, Mars, a Maltese have. Jupiter is this watermelon. You

:01:47.:01:51.

have the asteroid belt, which we are going to recreate with a bag of

:01:51.:01:57.

rivals like that. Some hundreds of thousands, that is the galaxy. And

:01:57.:02:03.

that is why I love lunchtime. Astronomy allows us to contemplate

:02:04.:02:09.

profound and very big things. The depth of the universe will see its

:02:09.:02:12.

gradual dissipation and ultimate demise, but the number of years

:02:12.:02:20.

until this happens is a huge number. So huge, I need help to express it,

:02:20.:02:28.

because it is 10,000 billion, billion. Billion. Billion. Billion.

:02:28.:02:35.

Billion years. That is like loads. Cheers.

:02:35.:02:45.
:02:45.:02:46.

I said, the only imperfection in his impression is that his hair is

:02:46.:02:51.

not cry enough. He needs to get a Cryer wig. You look like you, and

:02:52.:02:58.

you look like the bass guitar as from a Beatles tribute band. It is

:02:58.:03:06.

not a good look for you. Thank you for joining us. We have our experts,

:03:06.:03:11.

Tim O'Brien is with us, Dr Lucy Green, Dr Andrew Pontzen, we met

:03:11.:03:16.

briefly and did not get rid of you and we said goodbye, apologies.

:03:16.:03:21.

Thank you for coming back, it is very kind. We always give somebody

:03:21.:03:27.

a gift, you deserve it more than anybody. This is meteorite wine. It

:03:27.:03:31.

is Chilean, feel free to pop the cork. During the ageing process,

:03:32.:03:41.

they place a meatier into the cask. As Patrick Moore says, have a drink.

:03:41.:03:49.

How has it been out in the cold? Talk amongst yourselves! They claim

:03:50.:03:56.

it is like tasting the birth of the universe. Are you going to give it

:03:56.:04:04.

a taste? I certainly am. Who is coldest? I am not entirely

:04:05.:04:09.

convinced. You are an added astronomer. As it helped to have a

:04:09.:04:14.

few experts around -- Abid astronomer? It is always a great

:04:15.:04:18.

thing to get a great group of astronomers together and everybody

:04:18.:04:26.

helps each other out. There is quite a nice communal field.

:04:26.:04:34.

seems like a happy group of people. I haven't got wind, somehow. Am I

:04:34.:04:38.

supposed to drink from the bottle? How lousy does this look? It seems

:04:38.:04:43.

like a good time to go to a question from a 12-year-old. Great

:04:43.:04:49.

question, 12-year-old! Sorry. It is from Alex Worthington. The question

:04:49.:04:58.

is, could a black hole one day appear near Earth and suck us in?

:04:58.:05:03.

No, it won't suck us in. Yes, they could appear. There is a theory

:05:03.:05:08.

that there are things called primordial black holes, very small,

:05:08.:05:13.

atomic black holes. It could have been around -- they could have been

:05:13.:05:16.

around since the Big Bang. They could be small black holes around

:05:16.:05:20.

now, floating through this room, and we would not know it. How long

:05:20.:05:22.

would it take for them to develop into something bigger and more

:05:23.:05:28.

dangerous? They won't. Just because it collapses and it is a black hole,

:05:28.:05:33.

if the sun became a black hole... It would be about three kilometres.

:05:34.:05:38.

You could squash it down and you would not notice, the earth would

:05:38.:05:42.

continue to orbit around it. It is a misnomer that they give up

:05:42.:05:46.

everything that is around them. the sun turned into a black hole,

:05:46.:05:50.

it would get dark in eight minutes, we would get very cold and all die,

:05:50.:05:57.

but we would not get sucked into it! So look on the bright side!

:05:57.:06:01.

Tiny black holes also evaporate very quickly, it is faster for the

:06:01.:06:04.

small black holes and the big black holes. By quickly, what do you

:06:04.:06:13.

mean? You're putting me on the spot. Talking about fractions of a second.

:06:13.:06:18.

People are talking about CERN creating black holes. They were mad

:06:18.:06:23.

people! They are already watching ITV, or Big Brother. He drives them

:06:23.:06:28.

a way! It is not mad that it could create black holes, but they would

:06:28.:06:34.

evaporate very quickly. The sun is not going to become a black hole?

:06:34.:06:38.

It is not massive enough, you need to be several times the mass of the

:06:38.:06:42.

Sun to be able to end the days of the start collapsing down, with

:06:42.:06:48.

gravity unable to stop the collapse. It would die in a much calmer, more

:06:48.:06:58.
:06:58.:07:00.

sedate way. Heather asks, are black holes like wormholes in Star Trek?

:07:00.:07:04.

There is Solutions of Einstein's equations which have that property.

:07:04.:07:09.

I think they have to spin. I think we don't know, is probably the

:07:09.:07:16.

answer. There has been no evidence for them. We are not certain that

:07:16.:07:21.

they really do exist? You hear them a lot in science fiction. They

:07:21.:07:27.

might do. I don't think it is clear. If you have something that is

:07:27.:07:30.

formed in the real universe from a star collapsing. Under those

:07:30.:07:34.

circumstances, it seems unlikely you would end up with a 1 hole. It

:07:34.:07:40.

is more like mathematical solutions which have these wormholes. Can we

:07:40.:07:47.

get to Skype? I think we can get to Henry, he is six, with his mum.

:07:47.:07:57.
:07:57.:08:00.

Hello. What question have you got? What would happen if the sun went

:08:00.:08:07.

to a black hole, and how do black holes what? Thank you. Nice work.

:08:07.:08:09.

It is a brilliant question. We already spoke about what would

:08:09.:08:13.

happen, nothing would happen, except it would go dark and we

:08:13.:08:17.

would eventually get very cold. But the Earth and the solar system

:08:17.:08:21.

would remain the same. But how do black holes work is a fascinating

:08:21.:08:26.

question. The answer is that we don't know. Do you have anything to

:08:26.:08:32.

add? I think the thing about explaining why we would not get

:08:32.:08:36.

sucked into a black hole is, if you could get a giant pair of hands and

:08:36.:08:40.

crush the Sandown, it would turn into a black hole but it's a mass

:08:40.:08:46.

would not change -- the sound down. Its mass determines how we orbit

:08:46.:08:51.

around it. We would not notice if the sun turned into a black hole, I

:08:51.:08:57.

guess. There was a science-fiction idea that you could use the pull of

:08:57.:09:01.

a black hole and Emmett waste into it, and that would turn the well

:09:01.:09:10.

that it was on. Is there any way of harnessing something like that?

:09:10.:09:15.

is not obvious. Technologically, it seems pretty unlikely. But we see

:09:15.:09:18.

in the universe, black holes are an amazingly efficient way of its

:09:18.:09:23.

generating energy, more efficient than stars. If you chuck some mass

:09:23.:09:32.

into a black hole, something like 10% of E=MC squared comes back.

:09:32.:09:39.

That is from the radiation that we see. Matt asks, what is the largest

:09:39.:09:45.

black hole that we know of anywhere. There are several billions of times

:09:45.:09:50.

the mass of the Sun. The Super massive black holes that we talk

:09:50.:09:58.

about. There are ones which are like the sun collapsing, are the

:09:58.:10:06.

Super massive black colts much greater than the... Many times

:10:06.:10:11.

greater, you have to happen to have much more material coming in, which

:10:11.:10:21.
:10:21.:10:22.

is why you see them at the centre of galaxies. Do they begin as a

:10:22.:10:26.

super massive black holes? We have an idea of how they originate but

:10:26.:10:31.

they tend to be relatively small solar mass type black holes, it is

:10:31.:10:35.

pretty hard to see how you get from there to super massive black holes.

:10:35.:10:41.

Once you have the super massive million solar mass because, you can

:10:41.:10:46.

merge those and carry on making bigger ones. But it is hard.

:10:46.:10:51.

heard Event Horizon used. What is that? What is the difference

:10:51.:10:56.

between that and singularity. singularity is the mathematical

:10:56.:11:01.

description of what a black hole is. That is what the equations tell you

:11:01.:11:07.

you get. Considering how close you have to get to be sucked in, coming

:11:07.:11:12.

back to this idea that black holes are cosmic Hoovers, if the sun

:11:12.:11:16.

turned into a black hole, you would not get sucked in. But you would,

:11:16.:11:20.

if you got to the event horizon. That is the distance at which there

:11:20.:11:24.

is the point of no return. As you get closer to an object, the

:11:24.:11:29.

gravitational pull increases. When you get to the event horizon...

:11:29.:11:38.

have to interrupt. We are getting loads of photographs. We are going

:11:38.:11:42.

over to marker. This is a representation not to

:11:42.:11:50.

scale, I hasten to add, of the observable universe you have been

:11:50.:11:57.

sending in fantastic pictures. We have some quite incredible ones. I

:11:57.:12:07.
:12:07.:12:13.

start with a picture by Robert He took this using a five-inch

:12:13.:12:23.
:12:23.:12:34.

It is a really superb image. The second image was taken at the role

:12:34.:12:40.

right stones, which we used in our light permission film -- pollution

:12:40.:12:47.

from. The camera is pointed at the sky and allows the stars to trail

:12:47.:12:56.

across the camera. This is my favourite picture, of the sun with

:12:56.:13:04.

a jet aircraft passing just in front. It was taken with a solar

:13:04.:13:08.

telescope, which means you can get a very good clear image of the Sun,

:13:08.:13:18.
:13:18.:13:24.

Apparently we are getting nothing but the mouse questioning your

:13:24.:13:29.

hardline stance to UFOs. There is something on the Fermi Paradox

:13:29.:13:36.

which his 4th ball and powerful. -- -- which is a thoughtful. The

:13:36.:13:42.

question is, why are they not here? The reason is, the galaxy is sold,

:13:42.:13:48.

there are so many star systems, that is it is difficult to

:13:48.:13:52.

understand why there is not a civilisation somewhere that is more

:13:52.:13:58.

advanced, such as it should have colonise the galaxy. There is

:13:58.:14:02.

nothing in the law of physics that says, give us a million years and

:14:02.:14:06.

we should have been able to explore the galaxy. The question is, why

:14:06.:14:15.

don't we see these alien probes? It is difficult to explain why. My

:14:15.:14:20.

stance... I would not be surprised at all if a UFO landed over there.

:14:20.:14:26.

However... On people having fun and enjoying themselves... I think they

:14:26.:14:30.

are going to appear or they are not. If they want to come and be seen,

:14:30.:14:39.

If they want to hide, they will not mess it up a bit. They were not

:14:39.:14:43.

abduct 150,000 American farmers, failed to wipe the memory and then

:14:43.:14:49.

they write a book and become famous. They would not mess up in that way.

:14:49.:14:59.
:14:59.:15:01.

I think that aliens might be gently watching us in the same way that

:15:01.:15:04.

David Attenborough observes penguins. I like the assumption

:15:05.:15:12.

that the penguins do not observe David Attenborough. I don't think

:15:12.:15:16.

the penguins stick sticks into David Attenborough. Moving on to

:15:16.:15:21.

celestial matters. You can drink as I am asking. Do you think there

:15:21.:15:26.

will be a time when we can see black holes? Yes, I think this is a

:15:26.:15:30.

really interesting question. I think there may well be. There are

:15:30.:15:33.

lots of simulations done at the moment to give us an understanding

:15:33.:15:37.

of what we need to look for in order to be able to see these

:15:37.:15:42.

invisible object. You can see a mission from hot material that

:15:42.:15:48.

forms the disco around them. But if you seek no hot material, what are

:15:48.:15:54.

you looking for? A black shadow against the starry background. The

:15:54.:15:57.

simulations have shown us the distortions in the distribution of

:15:57.:16:00.

stars because of the effect of the black hole. Even if the black hole

:16:00.:16:05.

is spinning, the black shadow would change its shape and get distorted.

:16:05.:16:11.

Theoretically we understand some of what we should be looking for,

:16:11.:16:16.

should we get telescopes that are good enough. There is a meeting

:16:16.:16:23.

tomorrow in the States that is to discuss the event horizon telescope.

:16:23.:16:28.

They are looking at a network of 50 telescopes spread across the whole

:16:28.:16:31.

planet, working together, the King at the black hole at the centre of

:16:31.:16:39.

the Milky Way that we discussed earlier. -- looking at. We will be

:16:39.:16:45.

looking at light wavelengths of about 1 mm. They hope to see the

:16:45.:16:54.

shadow and directly see the black hole. We think that black holes

:16:54.:16:58.

Bennett something, and if that is true then they can evaporate away.

:16:58.:17:08.
:17:08.:17:09.

There is a stream of particles. Could we be sense -- sensitive

:17:09.:17:15.

enough to see that? I think the ones that live for very long time

:17:15.:17:19.

scales are very cold. When they get smaller, they emit radiation and

:17:20.:17:23.

they lose mass, they get smaller, and that process accelerated and

:17:23.:17:31.

they get hotter and hotter. I am not sure. It is unlikely that we

:17:31.:17:34.

could detect radiation from anything Astrophysical but

:17:34.:17:36.

something that is really interesting is gravitational wave

:17:36.:17:43.

detection. One way of detecting black holes is that when they are

:17:43.:17:46.

emerging they emit gravitational waves and there are projects to try

:17:46.:17:54.

it and detect them. Yes, we are looking for those ripples that

:17:54.:17:59.

would spread through the university. There would be two masses around it

:17:59.:18:02.

which could collide into one big black hole and that could happen in

:18:02.:18:05.

the next 10 years. Could there be the faintest possibility that if

:18:05.:18:10.

you pass through a black hole, wormhole, is somehow the men

:18:10.:18:17.

yourself into another dimension, another time? -- used somehow e-

:18:17.:18:25.

mailed yourself. If you look at a messy, collapsing star, complicated

:18:25.:18:28.

astrophysics means that these nice, mathematical properties go away and

:18:28.:18:32.

I honestly don't think we know what an astrophysical black hole is

:18:32.:18:36.

really like. On the subject of science fiction and science fact,

:18:36.:18:42.

that is the perfect point to go to Patrick Moore with that question.

:18:42.:18:47.

Science fact or science-fiction? Look at this remarkable picture. It

:18:47.:18:56.

is aerogel. Has aerogel ever been used in space? Science fact or

:18:56.:19:01.

science-fiction? OK, the question he was asking was about aerogel.

:19:01.:19:06.

Are you familiar with that? I am not going to say anything. I am

:19:06.:19:10.

familiar with it. It has been used in space missions, as he said. It

:19:10.:19:15.

can be used as a particle detector to detect radiation, where

:19:15.:19:19.

particles can pass through the aerogel faster than light. What

:19:19.:19:29.
:19:29.:19:33.

exactly is it? Highly dangerous? Lovely. I have heard it described

:19:33.:19:39.

as liquid smoke. It breaks open very easily. Very expensive. Is it

:19:39.:19:49.

important? That is really cool. That is the other half. Would you

:19:49.:19:56.

like to look? Has it been used in space? You have sort of answered

:19:56.:20:01.

that question. Have I done it again? You have. It is science fact.

:20:01.:20:09.

Is that right? Yes, this time you are right. Aerogel has been used in

:20:09.:20:15.

space to cap to cosmic dust. It is so incredibly low density that it

:20:15.:20:20.

picks it up. There is nothing else quite like it.

:20:20.:20:30.
:20:30.:20:30.

Aero gel is an incredibly low density foam and its shares for one

:20:30.:20:34.

trait with my hand. It is hydrophobic so that because water

:20:34.:20:44.
:20:44.:20:46.

and your hand should not get wet. - - repels water. That is bizarre. It

:20:47.:20:56.

is absolutely dry. Do It again! This is amazing. It is completely

:20:56.:21:04.

impossible to wash off or remove. My hand goes into water. You cannot

:21:04.:21:08.

feel any water. You can feel the temperature but not the winners.

:21:08.:21:18.
:21:18.:21:19.

And it comes out completely dry. That is how James Bond does it!

:21:19.:21:23.

had does feel very weird. I have a feeling this stuff will be on me

:21:23.:21:28.

forever in some shape or form. I must make a mental note not to go

:21:28.:21:34.

to the toilet immediately after the show. If large matters are drawn to

:21:34.:21:37.

one another, does that mean that black holes will eventually swallow

:21:37.:21:41.

everything up? I suppose theoretically if things got close

:21:41.:21:44.

enough to a black hole, then they could. But they don't keep on

:21:44.:21:49.

expanding. Over time do they get larger or smaller? Event Horizon

:21:49.:21:55.

will get larger if you have more material going into it. In the very

:21:55.:21:59.

long term, but the evolution of the universe will be overtaken by dark

:21:59.:22:03.

energy, or at least we think so. We don't really understand it. That

:22:03.:22:08.

will push all of the Delic is in the universe further apart. If for

:22:08.:22:16.

of the material can fall into the black holes, then they will be

:22:16.:22:21.

further and further apart and there will be lots of time to radiate

:22:21.:22:26.

radiation and evaporate. If they stop eating, they evaporate?

:22:26.:22:29.

Presumably the scales between different galaxies are sufficient

:22:29.:22:33.

that they will not heat up? Andrew is right. Things are not close

:22:33.:22:40.

enough in the universe to come together but the erratic laid... --

:22:40.:22:44.

theoretically... You have heard the boundaries of physics expressed

:22:44.:22:48.

beautifully. We have no idea what dark energy is, it is fair to say.

:22:48.:22:52.

It looks like 70% of the universe is taken up making the universe

:22:52.:22:57.

expand more quickly, accelerating its expansion. It is an absolute

:22:57.:23:01.

mystery. Black holes are a mystery. We are talking about this radiation

:23:01.:23:05.

as though it is the fat. It is well established theoretically but we do

:23:05.:23:12.

not know if black holes will evaporate. Do we know how we can

:23:12.:23:16.

interact with black holes? I will pass dark energy on to the

:23:16.:23:19.

cosmologists, but dark matter is potentially in the realm of

:23:19.:23:23.

particle physics. The Large Hadron Collider might make super separate

:23:23.:23:28.

particles, a whole new set, like a mirror world if you like, but

:23:28.:23:31.

heavier than these particles. The light is one of those is predicted

:23:31.:23:35.

to be stable and it is a candidate for dark matter. It could be that

:23:35.:23:39.

the universe is full of super symmetric particles. We may

:23:39.:23:44.

discover those in the coming years. Dark energy? It only behaves like

:23:44.:23:48.

anti-gravity. It was a complete shock when it was discovered in

:23:48.:23:52.

1998. We have been looking at the universe expanding and what we were

:23:52.:23:55.

expecting was these galaxies being pulled back together by their

:23:55.:23:59.

gravity. Then the expansion would be slowing down. We found that

:23:59.:24:03.

expansion was speeding up. We did not know what that was causing that

:24:03.:24:11.

and already we did not know what dark matter was, so we coined the

:24:11.:24:18.

expression dark energy. Can black holes hold the dark matter?

:24:18.:24:21.

There have been experiments to check for this with macro lenses.

:24:21.:24:26.

If the galaxy was full of little holes, we would be able to see that

:24:26.:24:30.

by staring at stars and seeing the twinkles. In a similar way to

:24:30.:24:35.

seeing what the planet hunters were doing. There would be a difference

:24:35.:24:39.

signal when you get a planet. They would twinkle because the black

:24:39.:24:44.

hole would pass in front of the star and Paul the light around it.

:24:44.:24:48.

That would actually make the star brighter for the moment. How are

:24:48.:24:53.

you doing, Jon? Dark matter and dark energy sound very sinister.

:24:53.:25:03.

is like a James Bond villain. Happy matter? Happy energy? As we saw,

:25:03.:25:06.

far from being dangerous, dark matter is probably the reason that

:25:06.:25:10.

we are here. Without the simulations that we have at the

:25:10.:25:15.

moment, there would not be any energy. Given that there are so

:25:15.:25:20.

many stars in the universe, is somebody watching, stargazing, and

:25:20.:25:26.

looking at us? If the universe is infinite, then yes. We can only see

:25:26.:25:30.

a little bit of the universe, which we call the observable universe. If

:25:30.:25:34.

you imagine as here, then there is a sphere around us from which

:25:34.:25:37.

lights have had time to reach us from the Big Bang. That is the edge

:25:38.:25:41.

of the observable universe. Beyond that we know there is more universe

:25:41.:25:46.

but we do not know if it goes on forever or not. If it did, there

:25:46.:25:53.

would be more Brian Coxs. There are already two and if they stand too

:25:53.:25:58.

close then they evaporate! We want you to go out and see what is in

:25:58.:26:03.

the sky above you and to help you, we have made this.

:26:03.:26:06.

Look South straight after the show tonight and hunt for the three

:26:06.:26:12.

stars in a row that make-up Orion's belt. A little closer to the

:26:13.:26:16.

horizon, you may be able to make out some brighter objects close

:26:16.:26:21.

together pointing down. These make- up Orion's sword. If the sky is

:26:21.:26:25.

dark and clear enough, in the middle of the sort you can see what

:26:25.:26:30.

looks like a fuzzy star. This is actually the Orion nebula, an area

:26:30.:26:36.

where new stars are forming. Still in the constellation of Orion, you

:26:37.:26:41.

can see a star at the other end of its life cycle. In the top left

:26:41.:26:48.

corner, the red super-giant. If you can get a good few of this star,

:26:48.:26:53.

you can see that it does look slightly red coloured. It is in the

:26:53.:26:59.

process of dying and one day it will explode and go supernova. If

:26:59.:27:05.

you look back up beyond Orion, there is more to find. At the very

:27:05.:27:09.

top of the constellation of Taurus, there is a tiny, closely packed

:27:09.:27:13.

group of stars. It is a star cluster of known as the seven

:27:13.:27:19.

sisters. The reason they are so close is that they all formed from

:27:19.:27:23.

the same gas cloud. On a much larger scale, looked to the West

:27:23.:27:29.

and you will be looking towards our nearest galaxy, Andromeda. It is

:27:29.:27:33.

above the tops dark in the Square of Pegasus. To the naked eye, it

:27:33.:27:40.

will look like a hazy smudge. It is actually bigger than our galaxy. If

:27:40.:27:47.

you are lucky enough to live in a very dark area, before the moon

:27:47.:27:52.

rises at 3am, try spotting our galaxy, the Milky Way. It is a

:27:52.:27:57.

dense fog of stars moving North West to South East, and passing

:27:57.:28:07.
:28:07.:28:10.

through Casio and serious, the brightest star in this sky.

:28:10.:28:14.

Mark has also recorded audio guides which you can download from the

:28:14.:28:18.

website. There is so much information. How are we doing on

:28:18.:28:22.

the planet hunting? We have had half a million analyses done, which

:28:22.:28:27.

is unbelievable. We will keep doing it and I think we will find planets.

:28:27.:28:31.

Half-a-million? Let's make it 1 million by the end of the show.

:28:31.:28:36.

Have you enjoyed it? At salute you wonderful. Thank you to the

:28:36.:28:41.

Liverpool and Macclesfield astronomy club. -- absolutely

:28:41.:28:51.
:28:51.:28:52.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS