Browse content similar to Back to Earth 2. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Welcome Back To Earth, a chance to explore some issues, shows some | :00:27. | :00:30. | |
photographs and give a sense of what it is like working on the show. | :00:30. | :00:35. | |
We thought we would make this little film. I am here by the | :00:35. | :00:38. | |
Lovell telescope at Jodrell Bank and at the start of each day before | :00:38. | :00:42. | |
every show, I like to come out here and make sure everything is working | :00:42. | :00:50. | |
like it should be. Yeah, all good. Come with me, as I take you on an | :00:50. | :00:56. | |
exclusive behind-the-scenes tour of Stargazing Live. It is from here | :00:56. | :01:00. | |
that the movements of that amazing dish behind they are precisely | :01:00. | :01:04. | |
monitored. My favourite bit is all these buttons, there's loads of | :01:04. | :01:07. | |
buttons and you want to go like that and press them all, but you | :01:07. | :01:11. | |
are not allowed to do that. You would get done if you were to do | :01:11. | :01:18. | |
that, so I am not doing it. This is a room that is full of tellies, and | :01:18. | :01:26. | |
pretty soon, I'm going to be on all of them. Having that. One of the | :01:26. | :01:30. | |
wonders of lunchtime is when I do some shopping and get some things | :01:30. | :01:35. | |
to recreate the diversity of our solar system. Like Mercury would be | :01:36. | :01:41. | |
a tick tack, just by the sun. You have got Venus and are worth. And | :01:41. | :01:46. | |
next to them, Mars, a Maltese have. Jupiter is this watermelon. You | :01:47. | :01:51. | |
have the asteroid belt, which we are going to recreate with a bag of | :01:51. | :01:57. | |
rivals like that. Some hundreds of thousands, that is the galaxy. And | :01:57. | :02:03. | |
that is why I love lunchtime. Astronomy allows us to contemplate | :02:04. | :02:09. | |
profound and very big things. The depth of the universe will see its | :02:09. | :02:12. | |
gradual dissipation and ultimate demise, but the number of years | :02:12. | :02:20. | |
until this happens is a huge number. So huge, I need help to express it, | :02:20. | :02:28. | |
because it is 10,000 billion, billion. Billion. Billion. Billion. | :02:28. | :02:35. | |
Billion years. That is like loads. Cheers. | :02:35. | :02:45. | |
:02:45. | :02:46. | ||
I said, the only imperfection in his impression is that his hair is | :02:46. | :02:51. | |
not cry enough. He needs to get a Cryer wig. You look like you, and | :02:52. | :02:58. | |
you look like the bass guitar as from a Beatles tribute band. It is | :02:58. | :03:06. | |
not a good look for you. Thank you for joining us. We have our experts, | :03:06. | :03:11. | |
Tim O'Brien is with us, Dr Lucy Green, Dr Andrew Pontzen, we met | :03:11. | :03:16. | |
briefly and did not get rid of you and we said goodbye, apologies. | :03:16. | :03:21. | |
Thank you for coming back, it is very kind. We always give somebody | :03:21. | :03:27. | |
a gift, you deserve it more than anybody. This is meteorite wine. It | :03:27. | :03:31. | |
is Chilean, feel free to pop the cork. During the ageing process, | :03:32. | :03:41. | |
they place a meatier into the cask. As Patrick Moore says, have a drink. | :03:41. | :03:49. | |
How has it been out in the cold? Talk amongst yourselves! They claim | :03:50. | :03:56. | |
it is like tasting the birth of the universe. Are you going to give it | :03:56. | :04:04. | |
a taste? I certainly am. Who is coldest? I am not entirely | :04:05. | :04:09. | |
convinced. You are an added astronomer. As it helped to have a | :04:09. | :04:14. | |
few experts around -- Abid astronomer? It is always a great | :04:15. | :04:18. | |
thing to get a great group of astronomers together and everybody | :04:18. | :04:26. | |
helps each other out. There is quite a nice communal field. | :04:26. | :04:34. | |
seems like a happy group of people. I haven't got wind, somehow. Am I | :04:34. | :04:38. | |
supposed to drink from the bottle? How lousy does this look? It seems | :04:38. | :04:43. | |
like a good time to go to a question from a 12-year-old. Great | :04:43. | :04:49. | |
question, 12-year-old! Sorry. It is from Alex Worthington. The question | :04:49. | :04:58. | |
is, could a black hole one day appear near Earth and suck us in? | :04:58. | :05:03. | |
No, it won't suck us in. Yes, they could appear. There is a theory | :05:03. | :05:08. | |
that there are things called primordial black holes, very small, | :05:08. | :05:13. | |
atomic black holes. It could have been around -- they could have been | :05:13. | :05:16. | |
around since the Big Bang. They could be small black holes around | :05:16. | :05:20. | |
now, floating through this room, and we would not know it. How long | :05:20. | :05:22. | |
would it take for them to develop into something bigger and more | :05:23. | :05:28. | |
dangerous? They won't. Just because it collapses and it is a black hole, | :05:28. | :05:33. | |
if the sun became a black hole... It would be about three kilometres. | :05:34. | :05:38. | |
You could squash it down and you would not notice, the earth would | :05:38. | :05:42. | |
continue to orbit around it. It is a misnomer that they give up | :05:42. | :05:46. | |
everything that is around them. the sun turned into a black hole, | :05:46. | :05:50. | |
it would get dark in eight minutes, we would get very cold and all die, | :05:50. | :05:57. | |
but we would not get sucked into it! So look on the bright side! | :05:57. | :06:01. | |
Tiny black holes also evaporate very quickly, it is faster for the | :06:01. | :06:04. | |
small black holes and the big black holes. By quickly, what do you | :06:04. | :06:13. | |
mean? You're putting me on the spot. Talking about fractions of a second. | :06:13. | :06:18. | |
People are talking about CERN creating black holes. They were mad | :06:18. | :06:23. | |
people! They are already watching ITV, or Big Brother. He drives them | :06:23. | :06:28. | |
a way! It is not mad that it could create black holes, but they would | :06:28. | :06:34. | |
evaporate very quickly. The sun is not going to become a black hole? | :06:34. | :06:38. | |
It is not massive enough, you need to be several times the mass of the | :06:38. | :06:42. | |
Sun to be able to end the days of the start collapsing down, with | :06:42. | :06:48. | |
gravity unable to stop the collapse. It would die in a much calmer, more | :06:48. | :06:58. | |
:06:58. | :07:00. | ||
sedate way. Heather asks, are black holes like wormholes in Star Trek? | :07:00. | :07:04. | |
There is Solutions of Einstein's equations which have that property. | :07:04. | :07:09. | |
I think they have to spin. I think we don't know, is probably the | :07:09. | :07:16. | |
answer. There has been no evidence for them. We are not certain that | :07:16. | :07:21. | |
they really do exist? You hear them a lot in science fiction. They | :07:21. | :07:27. | |
might do. I don't think it is clear. If you have something that is | :07:27. | :07:30. | |
formed in the real universe from a star collapsing. Under those | :07:30. | :07:34. | |
circumstances, it seems unlikely you would end up with a 1 hole. It | :07:34. | :07:40. | |
is more like mathematical solutions which have these wormholes. Can we | :07:40. | :07:47. | |
get to Skype? I think we can get to Henry, he is six, with his mum. | :07:47. | :07:57. | |
:07:57. | :08:00. | ||
Hello. What question have you got? What would happen if the sun went | :08:00. | :08:07. | |
to a black hole, and how do black holes what? Thank you. Nice work. | :08:07. | :08:09. | |
It is a brilliant question. We already spoke about what would | :08:09. | :08:13. | |
happen, nothing would happen, except it would go dark and we | :08:13. | :08:17. | |
would eventually get very cold. But the Earth and the solar system | :08:17. | :08:21. | |
would remain the same. But how do black holes work is a fascinating | :08:21. | :08:26. | |
question. The answer is that we don't know. Do you have anything to | :08:26. | :08:32. | |
add? I think the thing about explaining why we would not get | :08:32. | :08:36. | |
sucked into a black hole is, if you could get a giant pair of hands and | :08:36. | :08:40. | |
crush the Sandown, it would turn into a black hole but it's a mass | :08:40. | :08:46. | |
would not change -- the sound down. Its mass determines how we orbit | :08:46. | :08:51. | |
around it. We would not notice if the sun turned into a black hole, I | :08:51. | :08:57. | |
guess. There was a science-fiction idea that you could use the pull of | :08:57. | :09:01. | |
a black hole and Emmett waste into it, and that would turn the well | :09:01. | :09:10. | |
that it was on. Is there any way of harnessing something like that? | :09:10. | :09:15. | |
is not obvious. Technologically, it seems pretty unlikely. But we see | :09:15. | :09:18. | |
in the universe, black holes are an amazingly efficient way of its | :09:18. | :09:23. | |
generating energy, more efficient than stars. If you chuck some mass | :09:23. | :09:32. | |
into a black hole, something like 10% of E=MC squared comes back. | :09:32. | :09:39. | |
That is from the radiation that we see. Matt asks, what is the largest | :09:39. | :09:45. | |
black hole that we know of anywhere. There are several billions of times | :09:45. | :09:50. | |
the mass of the Sun. The Super massive black holes that we talk | :09:50. | :09:58. | |
about. There are ones which are like the sun collapsing, are the | :09:58. | :10:06. | |
Super massive black colts much greater than the... Many times | :10:06. | :10:11. | |
greater, you have to happen to have much more material coming in, which | :10:11. | :10:21. | |
:10:21. | :10:22. | ||
is why you see them at the centre of galaxies. Do they begin as a | :10:22. | :10:26. | |
super massive black holes? We have an idea of how they originate but | :10:26. | :10:31. | |
they tend to be relatively small solar mass type black holes, it is | :10:31. | :10:35. | |
pretty hard to see how you get from there to super massive black holes. | :10:35. | :10:41. | |
Once you have the super massive million solar mass because, you can | :10:41. | :10:46. | |
merge those and carry on making bigger ones. But it is hard. | :10:46. | :10:51. | |
heard Event Horizon used. What is that? What is the difference | :10:51. | :10:56. | |
between that and singularity. singularity is the mathematical | :10:56. | :11:01. | |
description of what a black hole is. That is what the equations tell you | :11:01. | :11:07. | |
you get. Considering how close you have to get to be sucked in, coming | :11:07. | :11:12. | |
back to this idea that black holes are cosmic Hoovers, if the sun | :11:12. | :11:16. | |
turned into a black hole, you would not get sucked in. But you would, | :11:16. | :11:20. | |
if you got to the event horizon. That is the distance at which there | :11:20. | :11:24. | |
is the point of no return. As you get closer to an object, the | :11:24. | :11:29. | |
gravitational pull increases. When you get to the event horizon... | :11:29. | :11:38. | |
have to interrupt. We are getting loads of photographs. We are going | :11:38. | :11:42. | |
over to marker. This is a representation not to | :11:42. | :11:50. | |
scale, I hasten to add, of the observable universe you have been | :11:50. | :11:57. | |
sending in fantastic pictures. We have some quite incredible ones. I | :11:57. | :12:07. | |
:12:07. | :12:13. | ||
start with a picture by Robert He took this using a five-inch | :12:13. | :12:23. | |
:12:23. | :12:34. | ||
It is a really superb image. The second image was taken at the role | :12:34. | :12:40. | |
right stones, which we used in our light permission film -- pollution | :12:40. | :12:47. | |
from. The camera is pointed at the sky and allows the stars to trail | :12:47. | :12:56. | |
across the camera. This is my favourite picture, of the sun with | :12:56. | :13:04. | |
a jet aircraft passing just in front. It was taken with a solar | :13:04. | :13:08. | |
telescope, which means you can get a very good clear image of the Sun, | :13:08. | :13:18. | |
:13:18. | :13:24. | ||
Apparently we are getting nothing but the mouse questioning your | :13:24. | :13:29. | |
hardline stance to UFOs. There is something on the Fermi Paradox | :13:29. | :13:36. | |
which his 4th ball and powerful. -- -- which is a thoughtful. The | :13:36. | :13:42. | |
question is, why are they not here? The reason is, the galaxy is sold, | :13:42. | :13:48. | |
there are so many star systems, that is it is difficult to | :13:48. | :13:52. | |
understand why there is not a civilisation somewhere that is more | :13:52. | :13:58. | |
advanced, such as it should have colonise the galaxy. There is | :13:58. | :14:02. | |
nothing in the law of physics that says, give us a million years and | :14:02. | :14:06. | |
we should have been able to explore the galaxy. The question is, why | :14:06. | :14:15. | |
don't we see these alien probes? It is difficult to explain why. My | :14:15. | :14:20. | |
stance... I would not be surprised at all if a UFO landed over there. | :14:20. | :14:26. | |
However... On people having fun and enjoying themselves... I think they | :14:26. | :14:30. | |
are going to appear or they are not. If they want to come and be seen, | :14:30. | :14:39. | |
If they want to hide, they will not mess it up a bit. They were not | :14:39. | :14:43. | |
abduct 150,000 American farmers, failed to wipe the memory and then | :14:43. | :14:49. | |
they write a book and become famous. They would not mess up in that way. | :14:49. | :14:59. | |
:14:59. | :15:01. | ||
I think that aliens might be gently watching us in the same way that | :15:01. | :15:04. | |
David Attenborough observes penguins. I like the assumption | :15:05. | :15:12. | |
that the penguins do not observe David Attenborough. I don't think | :15:12. | :15:16. | |
the penguins stick sticks into David Attenborough. Moving on to | :15:16. | :15:21. | |
celestial matters. You can drink as I am asking. Do you think there | :15:21. | :15:26. | |
will be a time when we can see black holes? Yes, I think this is a | :15:26. | :15:30. | |
really interesting question. I think there may well be. There are | :15:30. | :15:33. | |
lots of simulations done at the moment to give us an understanding | :15:33. | :15:37. | |
of what we need to look for in order to be able to see these | :15:37. | :15:42. | |
invisible object. You can see a mission from hot material that | :15:42. | :15:48. | |
forms the disco around them. But if you seek no hot material, what are | :15:48. | :15:54. | |
you looking for? A black shadow against the starry background. The | :15:54. | :15:57. | |
simulations have shown us the distortions in the distribution of | :15:57. | :16:00. | |
stars because of the effect of the black hole. Even if the black hole | :16:00. | :16:05. | |
is spinning, the black shadow would change its shape and get distorted. | :16:05. | :16:11. | |
Theoretically we understand some of what we should be looking for, | :16:11. | :16:16. | |
should we get telescopes that are good enough. There is a meeting | :16:16. | :16:23. | |
tomorrow in the States that is to discuss the event horizon telescope. | :16:23. | :16:28. | |
They are looking at a network of 50 telescopes spread across the whole | :16:28. | :16:31. | |
planet, working together, the King at the black hole at the centre of | :16:31. | :16:39. | |
the Milky Way that we discussed earlier. -- looking at. We will be | :16:39. | :16:45. | |
looking at light wavelengths of about 1 mm. They hope to see the | :16:45. | :16:54. | |
shadow and directly see the black hole. We think that black holes | :16:54. | :16:58. | |
Bennett something, and if that is true then they can evaporate away. | :16:58. | :17:08. | |
:17:08. | :17:09. | ||
There is a stream of particles. Could we be sense -- sensitive | :17:09. | :17:15. | |
enough to see that? I think the ones that live for very long time | :17:15. | :17:19. | |
scales are very cold. When they get smaller, they emit radiation and | :17:20. | :17:23. | |
they lose mass, they get smaller, and that process accelerated and | :17:23. | :17:31. | |
they get hotter and hotter. I am not sure. It is unlikely that we | :17:31. | :17:34. | |
could detect radiation from anything Astrophysical but | :17:34. | :17:36. | |
something that is really interesting is gravitational wave | :17:36. | :17:43. | |
detection. One way of detecting black holes is that when they are | :17:43. | :17:46. | |
emerging they emit gravitational waves and there are projects to try | :17:46. | :17:54. | |
it and detect them. Yes, we are looking for those ripples that | :17:54. | :17:59. | |
would spread through the university. There would be two masses around it | :17:59. | :18:02. | |
which could collide into one big black hole and that could happen in | :18:02. | :18:05. | |
the next 10 years. Could there be the faintest possibility that if | :18:05. | :18:10. | |
you pass through a black hole, wormhole, is somehow the men | :18:10. | :18:17. | |
yourself into another dimension, another time? -- used somehow e- | :18:17. | :18:25. | |
mailed yourself. If you look at a messy, collapsing star, complicated | :18:25. | :18:28. | |
astrophysics means that these nice, mathematical properties go away and | :18:28. | :18:32. | |
I honestly don't think we know what an astrophysical black hole is | :18:32. | :18:36. | |
really like. On the subject of science fiction and science fact, | :18:36. | :18:42. | |
that is the perfect point to go to Patrick Moore with that question. | :18:42. | :18:47. | |
Science fact or science-fiction? Look at this remarkable picture. It | :18:47. | :18:56. | |
is aerogel. Has aerogel ever been used in space? Science fact or | :18:56. | :19:01. | |
science-fiction? OK, the question he was asking was about aerogel. | :19:01. | :19:06. | |
Are you familiar with that? I am not going to say anything. I am | :19:06. | :19:10. | |
familiar with it. It has been used in space missions, as he said. It | :19:10. | :19:15. | |
can be used as a particle detector to detect radiation, where | :19:15. | :19:19. | |
particles can pass through the aerogel faster than light. What | :19:19. | :19:29. | |
:19:29. | :19:33. | ||
exactly is it? Highly dangerous? Lovely. I have heard it described | :19:33. | :19:39. | |
as liquid smoke. It breaks open very easily. Very expensive. Is it | :19:39. | :19:49. | |
important? That is really cool. That is the other half. Would you | :19:49. | :19:56. | |
like to look? Has it been used in space? You have sort of answered | :19:56. | :20:01. | |
that question. Have I done it again? You have. It is science fact. | :20:01. | :20:09. | |
Is that right? Yes, this time you are right. Aerogel has been used in | :20:09. | :20:15. | |
space to cap to cosmic dust. It is so incredibly low density that it | :20:15. | :20:20. | |
picks it up. There is nothing else quite like it. | :20:20. | :20:30. | |
:20:30. | :20:30. | ||
Aero gel is an incredibly low density foam and its shares for one | :20:30. | :20:34. | |
trait with my hand. It is hydrophobic so that because water | :20:34. | :20:44. | |
:20:44. | :20:46. | ||
and your hand should not get wet. - - repels water. That is bizarre. It | :20:47. | :20:56. | |
is absolutely dry. Do It again! This is amazing. It is completely | :20:56. | :21:04. | |
impossible to wash off or remove. My hand goes into water. You cannot | :21:04. | :21:08. | |
feel any water. You can feel the temperature but not the winners. | :21:08. | :21:18. | |
:21:18. | :21:19. | ||
And it comes out completely dry. That is how James Bond does it! | :21:19. | :21:23. | |
had does feel very weird. I have a feeling this stuff will be on me | :21:23. | :21:28. | |
forever in some shape or form. I must make a mental note not to go | :21:28. | :21:34. | |
to the toilet immediately after the show. If large matters are drawn to | :21:34. | :21:37. | |
one another, does that mean that black holes will eventually swallow | :21:37. | :21:41. | |
everything up? I suppose theoretically if things got close | :21:41. | :21:44. | |
enough to a black hole, then they could. But they don't keep on | :21:44. | :21:49. | |
expanding. Over time do they get larger or smaller? Event Horizon | :21:49. | :21:55. | |
will get larger if you have more material going into it. In the very | :21:55. | :21:59. | |
long term, but the evolution of the universe will be overtaken by dark | :21:59. | :22:03. | |
energy, or at least we think so. We don't really understand it. That | :22:03. | :22:08. | |
will push all of the Delic is in the universe further apart. If for | :22:08. | :22:16. | |
of the material can fall into the black holes, then they will be | :22:16. | :22:21. | |
further and further apart and there will be lots of time to radiate | :22:21. | :22:26. | |
radiation and evaporate. If they stop eating, they evaporate? | :22:26. | :22:29. | |
Presumably the scales between different galaxies are sufficient | :22:29. | :22:33. | |
that they will not heat up? Andrew is right. Things are not close | :22:33. | :22:40. | |
enough in the universe to come together but the erratic laid... -- | :22:40. | :22:44. | |
theoretically... You have heard the boundaries of physics expressed | :22:44. | :22:48. | |
beautifully. We have no idea what dark energy is, it is fair to say. | :22:48. | :22:52. | |
It looks like 70% of the universe is taken up making the universe | :22:52. | :22:57. | |
expand more quickly, accelerating its expansion. It is an absolute | :22:57. | :23:01. | |
mystery. Black holes are a mystery. We are talking about this radiation | :23:01. | :23:05. | |
as though it is the fat. It is well established theoretically but we do | :23:05. | :23:12. | |
not know if black holes will evaporate. Do we know how we can | :23:12. | :23:16. | |
interact with black holes? I will pass dark energy on to the | :23:16. | :23:19. | |
cosmologists, but dark matter is potentially in the realm of | :23:19. | :23:23. | |
particle physics. The Large Hadron Collider might make super separate | :23:23. | :23:28. | |
particles, a whole new set, like a mirror world if you like, but | :23:28. | :23:31. | |
heavier than these particles. The light is one of those is predicted | :23:31. | :23:35. | |
to be stable and it is a candidate for dark matter. It could be that | :23:35. | :23:39. | |
the universe is full of super symmetric particles. We may | :23:39. | :23:44. | |
discover those in the coming years. Dark energy? It only behaves like | :23:44. | :23:48. | |
anti-gravity. It was a complete shock when it was discovered in | :23:48. | :23:52. | |
1998. We have been looking at the universe expanding and what we were | :23:52. | :23:55. | |
expecting was these galaxies being pulled back together by their | :23:55. | :23:59. | |
gravity. Then the expansion would be slowing down. We found that | :23:59. | :24:03. | |
expansion was speeding up. We did not know what that was causing that | :24:03. | :24:11. | |
and already we did not know what dark matter was, so we coined the | :24:11. | :24:18. | |
expression dark energy. Can black holes hold the dark matter? | :24:18. | :24:21. | |
There have been experiments to check for this with macro lenses. | :24:21. | :24:26. | |
If the galaxy was full of little holes, we would be able to see that | :24:26. | :24:30. | |
by staring at stars and seeing the twinkles. In a similar way to | :24:30. | :24:35. | |
seeing what the planet hunters were doing. There would be a difference | :24:35. | :24:39. | |
signal when you get a planet. They would twinkle because the black | :24:39. | :24:44. | |
hole would pass in front of the star and Paul the light around it. | :24:44. | :24:48. | |
That would actually make the star brighter for the moment. How are | :24:48. | :24:53. | |
you doing, Jon? Dark matter and dark energy sound very sinister. | :24:53. | :25:03. | |
is like a James Bond villain. Happy matter? Happy energy? As we saw, | :25:03. | :25:06. | |
far from being dangerous, dark matter is probably the reason that | :25:06. | :25:10. | |
we are here. Without the simulations that we have at the | :25:10. | :25:15. | |
moment, there would not be any energy. Given that there are so | :25:15. | :25:20. | |
many stars in the universe, is somebody watching, stargazing, and | :25:20. | :25:26. | |
looking at us? If the universe is infinite, then yes. We can only see | :25:26. | :25:30. | |
a little bit of the universe, which we call the observable universe. If | :25:30. | :25:34. | |
you imagine as here, then there is a sphere around us from which | :25:34. | :25:37. | |
lights have had time to reach us from the Big Bang. That is the edge | :25:38. | :25:41. | |
of the observable universe. Beyond that we know there is more universe | :25:41. | :25:46. | |
but we do not know if it goes on forever or not. If it did, there | :25:46. | :25:53. | |
would be more Brian Coxs. There are already two and if they stand too | :25:53. | :25:58. | |
close then they evaporate! We want you to go out and see what is in | :25:58. | :26:03. | |
the sky above you and to help you, we have made this. | :26:03. | :26:06. | |
Look South straight after the show tonight and hunt for the three | :26:06. | :26:12. | |
stars in a row that make-up Orion's belt. A little closer to the | :26:13. | :26:16. | |
horizon, you may be able to make out some brighter objects close | :26:16. | :26:21. | |
together pointing down. These make- up Orion's sword. If the sky is | :26:21. | :26:25. | |
dark and clear enough, in the middle of the sort you can see what | :26:25. | :26:30. | |
looks like a fuzzy star. This is actually the Orion nebula, an area | :26:30. | :26:36. | |
where new stars are forming. Still in the constellation of Orion, you | :26:37. | :26:41. | |
can see a star at the other end of its life cycle. In the top left | :26:41. | :26:48. | |
corner, the red super-giant. If you can get a good few of this star, | :26:48. | :26:53. | |
you can see that it does look slightly red coloured. It is in the | :26:53. | :26:59. | |
process of dying and one day it will explode and go supernova. If | :26:59. | :27:05. | |
you look back up beyond Orion, there is more to find. At the very | :27:05. | :27:09. | |
top of the constellation of Taurus, there is a tiny, closely packed | :27:09. | :27:13. | |
group of stars. It is a star cluster of known as the seven | :27:13. | :27:19. | |
sisters. The reason they are so close is that they all formed from | :27:19. | :27:23. | |
the same gas cloud. On a much larger scale, looked to the West | :27:23. | :27:29. | |
and you will be looking towards our nearest galaxy, Andromeda. It is | :27:29. | :27:33. | |
above the tops dark in the Square of Pegasus. To the naked eye, it | :27:33. | :27:40. | |
will look like a hazy smudge. It is actually bigger than our galaxy. If | :27:40. | :27:47. | |
you are lucky enough to live in a very dark area, before the moon | :27:47. | :27:52. | |
rises at 3am, try spotting our galaxy, the Milky Way. It is a | :27:52. | :27:57. | |
dense fog of stars moving North West to South East, and passing | :27:57. | :28:07. | |
:28:07. | :28:10. | ||
through Casio and serious, the brightest star in this sky. | :28:10. | :28:14. | |
Mark has also recorded audio guides which you can download from the | :28:14. | :28:18. | |
website. There is so much information. How are we doing on | :28:18. | :28:22. | |
the planet hunting? We have had half a million analyses done, which | :28:22. | :28:27. | |
is unbelievable. We will keep doing it and I think we will find planets. | :28:27. | :28:31. | |
Half-a-million? Let's make it 1 million by the end of the show. | :28:31. | :28:36. | |
Have you enjoyed it? At salute you wonderful. Thank you to the | :28:36. | :28:41. | |
Liverpool and Macclesfield astronomy club. -- absolutely | :28:41. | :28:51. | |
:28:51. | :28:52. |